things | Collection of microcontroller projects

so I'm struggling with these things:

I have method that returns istream input and takes istream input as a parameter, sends values to vector and stores them in it. Now, when I've entered 1 value, I'm trying to make a check if vector already contains that value, here is my code to understand it better:

I have a project(A) is a normal winform and another project(B) is a vsto addsin for word project screenshot my VSTO adds-in references parts of project B when i make an installation and try to install it the installation gives me an error. error message things i have tried is made a installation for project A and installed it first then tried to install Project B but it gives the same error.

I am trying to have a number of columns with exact widths, and their heights split evenly between some number of elements. For some reason, despite my indicating an exact 200px width on each column, they are instead getting a computed width of 162px somehow. Chrome dev tools is showing some weird arrow thing indicating that it it was shrunk from it's intended size for some reason. I've even tried removing all of the content from the div's as possible so as to rule out some weird interaction with the size of children.

The html for the relevant area is this:

I have two select form with submit button, I need to get the result of selected value for example

first select form having colours as an option and second contains another things.

and i have some items as div....red flower , red fish.

if i select red from first form its shows red value div and in second form if i select flower it should display red flower only but it's shows everything under the value red. And these all thing must work only when i submit the search button. I have attached jsfiddle below. Code:

I'm implementing Testing Library with Puppeteer and I was trying to use an environment variable, DEBUG_PRINT_LIMIT, to limit the length of the HTML printed to console in case of failure.

But for some reasons, the variable environment is just ignored by the library...

My project:

package.json

I am currently trying to build OpenPose. First, I will try to describe the environment and then the error emerging from it. Caffe, being built from source, resides in its entirety in [/Users...]/openpose/3rdparty instead of the usual location (I redact some parts of the filepaths in this post for privacy). All of its include files can be found in [/Users...]/openpose/3rdparty/caffe/include/caffe. After entering this command:

In the app file I have a function called refreshList, when I update things in a database on the site I call it so that the state is updated and all the components are refreshed.

But I noticed something very strange when I called the function

Update: Added a simpler demonstration jsfiddle, https://jsfiddle.net/47sfj3Lv/3/.

reproducing the problem in much less code I'm trying to move away from jQuery.

Some of my code, for populating some tables, has code like this

I read this answer, which clarified a lot of things, but I'm still confused about how I should go about designing my primary key.

First off I want to clarify the idea of WCUs. I get that WCU is the write capacity of max 1kb per second. Does it mean that if writing a piece of data takes 0.25 seconds, I would need 4 of those to be billed 1 WCU? Or each time I write something it consumes 1 WCU, but I could also write X times within 1 second and still be billed 1 WCU?

Usage

I want to create a table that stores the form data for a set of gyms (95% will be waivers, the rest will be incidents reports). Most of the time, each forms will be accessed directly via its unique ID. I also want to query the forms by date, form, userId, etc..

We can assume an average of 50k forms per gym

Options

• First option is straight forward: having the formId be the partition key. What I don't like about this option is that scan operations will always filter out 90% of the data (i.e. the forms from other gyms), which isn't good for RCUs.

• Second option is that I would make the gymId the partition key, and add a sort key for the date, formId, userId. To implement this option I would need to know more about the implications of having 50k records on one partition key.

• Third option is to have one table per gyms and have the formId as partition key. This seems to be like the best option for now, but I don't really like the idea of having a a large number of tables doing the same thing in my account.

Is there another option? Which one of the three is better?

Edit: I'm assuming another option would be SimpleDB?