ticketfile | textual representation of a thermal printer receipt | 3D Printing library
kandi X-RAY | ticketfile Summary
kandi X-RAY | ticketfile Summary
A Ticketfile is a textual representation of a thermal printer receipt. It allows you to write simple readable text for your receipts rather than having to deal for example with ESC/POS specification directly.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- NewCommand creates a new command
- Convert converts a ticketfile command to a ticketfile .
- parse parses a single command line .
- Main entry point
- NewConverter returns a new Converter .
- NewEngine returns a new Engine .
ticketfile Key Features
ticketfile Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ticketfile
QUESTION
I created a new connection 'ticketFile'
with PowerQuery. It appeared in a new sheet in my excel file. As I didn't want this data to be shown in a sheet (but still wanted it to exist), I just deleted the sheet.
And now I get an error each time I do a refresh All :
We couldn't get the data from 'ticketFile' in the workbook 'C:\[...]\Biweekly Reports.xlsx'.
I found out in the existing connections
Now I'm trying to delete the ticketFile table without having any access to it. How should I do this ?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Apr-20 at 10:55After some research I found out that in some manipulation I created a new Connection named WorksheetConnection_Biweekly Reports.xlsx!csv
.
(Note: I found the connections at Data -> Queries & Connections
it seems it is not always the case depending on the version of Excel you are using.)
When looking at its proprieties I did find the same Locations that in the main ThisWorkbookDataModel
and the ticketFile
table I wanted to delete did not appear in it. So at first I didn't think the problem was there.
But spoilers:
It was
Deleting the WorksheetConnection_Biweekly Reports.xlsx!csv
solved my issue without inferfering with any of my PivotTables.
QUESTION
Unfortunately I haven't found a good answer for this problem yet. The answers and questions I have seen so far in here are about big tables with a lot of records.
I'm trying to query a table called Tickets with the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-14 at 13:35I see several possible improvements.
For some reason you chose to deviate from the entity framework code fist conventions. One of them is the use of a List
instead of an ICollection
, another it that you omit to mention the foreign keys.
Use ICollection istead of List
Are you sure that Ticket.TicketFiles[4]
has a defined meaning? And what would Ticket.TicketFiles.Insert(4, new TicketFile())
mean?
Better stick to an interface that prohibits usage of functions that have no defined meaning. Use ICollection
. This way you'll have only functions that have a proper meaning in the context of a database. Besides it gives entity framework the freedom to chose the most efficient collection type to execute its queries.
Let your classes represent the tables
Let your classes just be POCOs. Don't add any functionality that is not in your tables.
In entity framework the columns of a table are represented by non-virtual properties. The virtual properties represent the relations between the tables (one-to-many, many-to-many, ...)
Let entity framework decide what's the most efficient to initialize the data in your sequences. Don't use a constructor where you create a List, which will be immediately thrown away by entity framework to replace it with its own ICollection
. Don't automatically initialize property Deleted
, if entity framework immediately replaces it with its own value.
You will probably have only one procedure where you will add a Ticket to the database. Use this function to properly initialize the field of any "newly added Ticket"
Don't forget the foreign keys
You defined several relations between your tables (one-to-many, or many-to-many?) but you forgot to define the foreign keys. Because of your use of virtual
entity framework can understand that it needs foreign keys and will add them, but in your query you need to write e.Status != null && e.Status.Id == statusId
, while obviously you could just use the foreign key e.StatusId == statusId
. For this you don't have to join with the Statuses table
Another reason to specify the foreign keys: they are real columns in your tables. If you define that these classes represent your tables, they should be in these classes!
Only select the properties you actually plan to use
One of the slower parts of a database query is the transport of the selected data from the database management system to your local process. Hence it is wise to select only the data you actually plan to use.
Example. There seems to be a one-to-many between a User
and a Ticket
: every User has zero or more Tickets
, every Ticket
belongs to exactly one User
. Suppose User
4 has 20 Tickets
. Every Ticket
will have a UserId
with a value 4. If you fetch these 20 Tickets
without a proper Select
you will fetch all properties of the same User
4 once per Ticket
, and you will transport the data of this same User
20 times (with all his properties, and maybe all his relations). What a waste of processing power!
Always use Select to query your data and Select only the properties you actually plan to use. Only use Include if you plan to updated the Included data.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ticketfile
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page