zoidberg | app service discovery for mesos and marathon

by bobrik Go Version: 0.6.1 License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(2)Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | zoidberg Summary

zoidberg is a Go library. zoidberg has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Zoidberg provides per app service discovery for Mesos with pluggable discovery mechanisms. It allows you to shift traffic from version to version in small percentages to ensure smooth deployments. It also allows usual service discovery where it's up to framework how to schedule tasks to avoid downtime.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

zoidberg has a low active ecosystem.

It has 60 star(s) with 6 fork(s). There are 12 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 2 open issues and 0 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of zoidberg is 0.6.1

Quality

zoidberg has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

zoidberg has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

zoidberg code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

zoidberg does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

zoidberg releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed zoidberg and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into zoidberg implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

main is the main entry point for testing
updateBalancers iterates over the discovery and updates the balancer .
Extract apps from labels .
NewExplorer creates a new explorer .
Register a new FinderMaker .
ramTaskToServer is used to create a server from a marathon task
initZK sets up a zookeeper connection to the given zk .
NewMarathonFinder creates a MarathonFinder
BalancerFromString creates a balancer from string
extractLegacyApp extracts the legacy app from the labels

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

zoidberg Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for zoidberg.

zoidberg Examples and Code Snippets

Zoidberg,Running,Zoidberg API

Lines of Code : 27

License : No License

Copy

{
  "1": {
    "weight": 2
  }
}

{
  "balancers": [
    {
      "host": "192.168.0.7",
      "port": 31631
    }
  ],
  "apps": {
    "myapp": {
      "name": "myapp",
      "servers": [
        {
          "host": "192.168.0.7",
          "port": 3

Zoidberg,Running

Lines of Code : 10

License : No License

Copy

docker run --rm -it --net host \
    -e HOST=0.0.0.0 \
    -e PORT=12345 \
    -e ZK=127.0.0.1:2181/zoidberg \
    -e APPLICATION_FINDER=marathon \
    -e APPLICATION_FINDER_MARATHON_URL=http://172.16.91.128:8080 \
    -e APPLICATION_FINDER_MARATHON_

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on zoidberg

How to isolate Jetty HttpClient for multiple users?

SwiftUI - Interesting problem with binding array in list when deleting

QUESTION

How to isolate Jetty HttpClient for multiple users?

Asked 2020-Sep-03 at 16:15

I am using Eclipse Jetty HttpClient to send POST requests to a server, for load testing.

TL;DR: Is there a way to use a single HttpClient instance with multiple user credential sets to a single destination URL?

For this purpose, I need to log in to the server-under-test as separate users. Even though HttpClient is thread safe, it does not appear to support this with a single instance, due to its shared authentication store.

The solution seems easy, just use one HttpClient per user, or per thread.

This works okay, except that HttpClient creates a number of threads (5 to 10 it seems) for each instance, and so my load test needs a very large heap or else it will start throwing OutOfMemory exceptions when trying to create new threads.

For example, in this very basic test, the first set of credentials is used for all subsequent POSTs:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-03 at 16:15

What you need can be done by "preempting" the authentication headers for every request, as explained in the documentation.

This is how you would do it:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63726938

QUESTION

SwiftUI - Interesting problem with binding array in list when deleting

Asked 2020-Jan-23 at 12:00

This is a very similar problem to one I had before (which no one could answer). I'm trying to create a dynamic list in which I can edit elements. As far as I can gather, the recommended way to do this is to have an EditView, with bindings, that's activated by a NavigationLink in the LIst.
So, I've done that. It appears to work at first, until I realised that each NavigationLink would only work once (is this a bug?). I can't think what I could have done wrong to cause that.
Then I thought perhaps I can switch to in-place editing by having the EditView in the List. I devised a theoretical way to do this, then tried it in my code. And at first it seemed to work great. However, if 'edit in place' is on, deleting the last element causes 'Fatal error: Index out of range'.
I've bundled my whole code into one file so you can just copy and paste into Xcode to try for yourself.
I'm starting to think that maybe XCode 11.3.1 is far from the finished article, yet.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jan-23 at 12:00

Ok despite my comment I tried to get to a solution and I might found an acceptable one:

I had to remodel Person... The whole indices was the issue of course but I couldn't exactly find out when what happens. I even tried with a local @State which updates the view and then updates the array of the @ObservedObject...

here are some links which could help to further investigate though...

Swift UI detail remove

How do I set the toggle state in a foreach loop in SwiftUI

Also this link here shows how to update members of an observed array generically which is pretty cool!:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/57920136/5981293

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59863640

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install zoidberg

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: