provider-azure | Crossplane Azure Provider | Azure library
kandi X-RAY | provider-azure Summary
kandi X-RAY | provider-azure Summary
This provider-azure repository is the Crossplane infrastructure provider for Microsoft Azure. The provider that is built from the source code in this repository can be installed into a Crossplane control plane and adds the following new functionality:.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- toPGSQLProperties converts v1beta1 . SQLServerParameters to postgres . BasicServerProperties .
- toMySQLProperties converts v1beta1 . ServerParameters to mysql . BasicServerProperties .
- NewUpdateParameters returns a new redis . UpdateParameters object .
- NewAggregateClient returns a new instance of AggregateClient
- newManagedCluster creates a new managed cluster .
- Run the kingpin command line
- FetchAsyncOperation fetches the asynchronous operation status .
- IsPostgreSQLUpToDate returns true if the given server is up to date
- IsMySQLUpToDate returns true if the given server is up to date
- isIPTagsUpToDate returns true if and only if the current IP tags are updated
provider-azure Key Features
provider-azure Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on provider-azure
QUESTION
I need to switch off some probes on LB for LoadBalancer type services. As this is not possible I fall back to trying to set long probe interval. This can be done by annotations defined on this documentation page.
But I am not able to update the health probe values, the annotations are not working. I verified that it works for setting internal LB, but I am not able to influence the probes by annotation. Is there any other requirement other then having kubernetes version higher than 1.21?
UPDATE
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-22 at 12:45The reason for the annotations not being picked up is describe here. Either you need to enable Cloud controller or rise version of AKS to 1.22
QUESTION
I'm just getting confused bec I have seen examples of using alternativeSecurityIds and others using userIdentities? Are they one and the same?
Also, I want to update my azure ad multi-tenant federation using userIdentity instead of alternativeUserId, can I use any name for the issuer or does it need to take the value of PartnerClaimType="iss" like below?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-03 at 19:30The underlying Identity structure is the same.
Yes, I agree - very confusing.
The samples refer to userIdentities but the documentation still refers to alternativeSecurityId.
The feedback I have got is that userIdentities are the way to go.
Update
QUESTION
In Terraform, I'm trying to get my App Service to connect to a storage account so that it can read files for the main website.
I've been following the guide on HashiCorp today: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/azurerm/latest/docs/resources/app_service#access_key
Here it mentions to be able to do this it has to connect via an access key, this is where it gets confusing. I found a working example here: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/10435
Yet mine errors and I think its to do with the key, I first tried doing it via a customer managed key then a data source and now I'm just very confused on how to actually get this to work.
Once again the Terraform Docs are limited at best.
Here is my Code:
Website App Code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-15 at 21:30If you are giving name = azurerm_storage_account.website_installers_account.id in storage account block for your then it will give the below error . So , you have to give a name to it only which you want to set like WebsiteStorageConnectionString.
And for the second error that you get as below because we can't use Azure Blobs on Windows App Service ,It is a limitation from Microsoft end as mentioned in this Microsoft Document.So, as a solution you can use kind = linux in app service plan block or you can create a file share and use it with app service if you don't want to change kind.
Solutions:
- Creating a file share instead of Container and Using AzureFiles instead of Azure blobs.
QUESTION
Trying to Create AKS which is behind Proxy, AKS failed to launch Worker Node in node pool, failing with connection timeout error, https://mcr.microsoft.com/ 443
Tried using below argument but getting error https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/azurerm/latest/docs/resources/kubernetes_cluster#http_proxy_config
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-23 at 13:12You will have to declare the http_proxy , https_proxy and no_proxy inside the http_proxy_config block in azurerm_kubernetes_cluster resource block.
The code will be like below :
QUESTION
I created a new Trigger for my Datafactory Pipeline using Terraform's azurerm_data_factory_trigger_schedule provider key.
The trigger is meant to kick off every 4th of the month, 13:00 UTC.
However, the Status doesn't automatically get set to Started after deployment. Following the changes made on this PR to support activated property,
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/pull/13390
I added activated to my TF script. Current TF script looks as such:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-01 at 12:36This has been confirmed as a bug from Terraform side as when we are using activated = true , the schedule block doesn't seem to be working and errors out .
When activated is not provided as parameter and schedule is used, then instead of being by default true it sets to false.
Details for the Bug Fix and Bug can be found on this Github Issue and Pull request
QUESTION
What specific syntax must be changed below in order for the terraform cli to return only one
jsonobject describing state instead of 4jsonobjects?
The command we are currently running is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-25 at 18:07This is not a standard terraform show --json output. I suspect that you set TF_LOG to DEBUG or INFO. Thus you have to change that env variable to normal value. For example, if you run it in bash on linux you can change it in one line as follows:
QUESTION
I have a complex kubernetes customer resource definition. I want to generate a valid custom resource object from the definition and then replace some values with mine. This is for quick testing purposes.
Instead of creating a yaml file from scratch, I'd like to use a tool to automatically generate it. Like what kubebuilder does when creating an API (put sample objects under config/samples).
Question: Is there any existing tool for this purpose?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-27 at 10:51Generally, for generating custom Kubernetes objects based on template there are two solutions:
Both of them have a good documentations with examples - you can find them here for Kustomize and here for Helm.
For better understanding what exactly are they used for and what are differences between them I suggest reading this article and this StackOverFlow answer.
QUESTION
A couple of weeks ago i published similar question regarding a Kubernetes deployment that uses Key Vault (with User Assigned Managed identity method). The issue was resolved but when trying to implemente everything from scratch something makes not sense to me.
Basically i am getting this error regarding mounting volume:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-25 at 00:29After doing some tests, it seems that the process that I was following was correct. Most probably, I was using principalId instead of clientId in role assignment for the AKS managed identity.
Key points for someone else that is facing similar issues:
Check what the managed identity created automatically by AKS is. Check for the
clientId; e.g.,
QUESTION
I have an Azure AD named FOO where I have a bunch of users. I created an Azure ADB2C as a Resource inside the FOO directory, named BAR, in which I want to signUp/signIn users. However, if you are already a user in FOO I want you to be able to connect via an Identity Provider.
Is this possible? I did not manage to make this work. I'm currently following these docs:
1 This seems like it works for FOO AD for FOO ADB2C.
2 This seems like it would fit my scenario.
3 This seems like it would work for FOO ADB2C to BAR ADB2C.
Even tho the second docs fit my scenario, I see that it's mandatory to use custom policies, which I'm not a fan of. Is there any workaround? Has anybody faced this scenario before?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-14 at 09:00Since you are using a signin flow, Azure AD B2C is expecting the user object to exist in the B2C directory.
You'll have to either:
- Use a signin/signup flow that makes B2C create the user if it does not already exist
- Use a custom policy that allows local users to sign in + creates users objects for your AAD users if they don't exist yet
QUESTION
I have a service principal that is used when running my Terraform scripts that works for 99% of what I need to do. However I then need to run the following script with terraform to update a property on an App Registration - as this is the only way it can be done (Here for reference - https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azuread/issues/188).
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-16 at 15:43You would need to give Application.ReadWrite.All permission under Microsoft Graph. Currently you have given that permission under Azure Active Directory Graph.
Once you do that, you should not get this error.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install provider-azure
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
