provision | API bindings , clients and integrations supporting RackN

There are a number of things to look into.
If you are running Expo in the SDK then no need for cocoa pods just the most up-to-date version of the CLI tool.

Run expo --version to determine what version you are currently working with. Update if needed.

Adding a profile might be useful too. Along with checking your config. Configuring EAS Build with eas.json

eas build --platform ios --profile distribution

Also, be sure that all the apple certificates are active and connected to your Expo account for that project.

Yes, IOT Central is purely based on plug and play Digital Twins

plug and play Digital Twins enables solution builders to integrate IoT devices with their solutions without any manual configuration.

Azure Digital Twins can be used to design a digital twin architecture that represents actual IoT devices in a wider cloud solution, and which connects to IoT Hub device twins to send and receive live data.

Reference link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-develop/overview-iot-plug-and-play https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/digital-twins/overview#:~:text=What%20is%20Azure%20Digital%20Twins%3F%201%20Azure%20Digital,solution.%203%20Service%20limits.%20...%204%20Terminology.

Try this:

Yes and yes. Earlier CDK versions did not even permit passing text values to the Secret constructor. We only recently got the secretStringBeta1: string prop along with a stern warning:

It is highly encouraged to leave this field undefined and allow SecretsManager to create the secret value. The secret string -- if provided -- will be included in the output of the cdk as part of synthesis, and will appear in the CloudFormation template in the console. This can be secure(-ish) if that value is merely reference to another resource (or one of its attributes), but if the value is a plaintext string, it will be visible to anyone with access to the CloudFormation template (via the AWS Console, SDKs, or CLI).

Our CDK code and generated templates are meant to be deterministic and version-controlled, further heightening the risk of leakage if plaintext secrets are used.

Edit: Per @gshpychka's comment, a safe alternative to importing with Secret.fromSecretArn is to construct a new Secret without a secret value. This creates a secret with a random password, which you change post-deploy in the Console. This approach helpfully ties the secret's lifecycle to the Stack and lets you set its properties in the context of the Stack.

Depending on the kind of CarPlay application you have different templates that you can and cannot present. In the Sections section of the CarPlay Programming Guide you can see which templates are allowed for audio applications. Additionally, I think only a list or tab template is allowed as a root template. Which template are you trying to set as root?

Thanks to guidance from @Tinxuanna, I've managed to solve the issue (finally!).

For anyone else having similar issues, here's what I did:

1. Access the /etc/hosts folder
2. Find file called hosts and open it in a text editor.
3. Remove the IP addresses related to vagrant (I kept a backup of the original file just in case)
4. After saving hosts file the IP addresses removed, I ran vagrant up --provision
5. I then ran vagrant up
6. Then accessed vvv.test
7. You're done!

The solution is to use a Configuration deployment platform hook for any commands that change the files in the deployment directory. Note that this is different from an Application deployment platform hook.

Using the example of the collectstatic command, the best thing to do is to move it from a container command to a pair of hooks, one for standard deployments and one for configuration changes.

To do this, remove the collectstatic container command. Then, make two identical files:

• .platform/confighooks/predeploy/predeploy.sh
• .platform/hooks/predeploy/predeploy.sh

Each file should have the following code:

Is performing indirection from a pointer acquired from converting an integer value definitely UB?

Not always. Here is an example that is definitely not UB:

You cannot change the resource names of the resources provisioned by AKS itself. Because it is managed by AKS only. you can give your own name of node resource group at the time of creation using IAC tool like Terraform, Biceps etc. But you can’t change the node resource name of AKS once created.

From Portal you can not assign your own name of node_resource_group

Note : node_resource_group - (Optional) The name of the Resource Group where the Kubernetes Nodes should exist. Changing this forces a new resource to be created.

Azure requires that a new, non-existent Resource Group is used, as otherwise the provisioning of the Kubernetes Service will fail.

Please Refer these document : azurerm_kubernetes_cluster | Resources | hashicorp/azurerm | Terraform Registry

Microsoft.ContainerService/managedClusters - Bicep & ARM template reference | Microsoft Docs