sensors | Hardware sensor interfaces through GPIO , I2C & SPI

Inheritance is not the solution to everything. Sometimes all the problems are gone once you don't use inheritance. There are many different ways to do what you want. One is to store the callables as members:

I think what you want is

It looks like the issue has something to do with Unity not including the bluetooth capability when building directly from Unity and running.

When I built the project and then loaded it into Visual Studio and executed it there, I did not get any errors.

So that will be my plan....build and then open in Visual Studio.

It's not so very obvious on how to use these libraries (but that's complex math, so this is actually expected...)

You can print the contents of a matrix like so:

If you are not bound to use a Graph component for the map, the Map component from dash-leaflet supports click events natively. Here is a small example, where map clicks are used to update a graph,

Before posting the code, I think it's worth mentioning, this should work as long as all CSVs have always the same headers / columns. If this was not the case something like this could happen:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're trying to calculate a phone's absolute position in space at any moment in time directly from (past and present) accelerometer data, that is actually very complex, mainly because the phone's accelerometer's frame of reference in terms of x, y, and z is the phone itself... and phones are not in a fixed orientation, especially when being thrown around, and besides... it will have zero acceleration while in the air, anyway.

It's sort of like being blindfolded and being taken on a space journey in a pod with rockets that fire in different directions randomly, and being expected to know where you are at the end. That would be technically possible if you knew where you were when you started, and you had the ability to track every acceleration vector you felt along the way... and integrate this with gyroscope data as well... converting all this into a single path.

But, luckily, we can still get the height thrown from the accelerometer indirectly, along with some other measurements.

This solution assumes that:

• The sensors package provides acceleration values, NOT velocity values (even though it claims to provide velocity, strangely), because accelerometers themselves provide acceleration.
• Total acceleration is equal to sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) regardless of phone orientation.
• The accelerometer will read zero (or gravity only) during the throw
• This article in wired is correct in that Height = (Gravity * Time^2) / 8

The way my code works is:

• You (user) hold the "GO" button down.
• When you throw the phone up, naturally you let go of the button, which starts the timer, and the phone starts listening to accelerometer events.
• We assume that the total acceleration of the phone in the air is zero (or gravity only, depending on chosen accelerometer data type)... so we're not actually trying to calculate distance directly from the accelerometer data:
• Instead, we are using the accelerometer ONLY to detect when you have caught the phone... by detecting a sudden change in acceleration using a threshold.
• When this threshold is met, the timer is stopped.
• Now we have a total time value for the throw from beginning to end and can calculate the height.

Side notes:

• I'm using AccelerometerEvent (includes gravity), not UserAccelerometer event (does not include gravity), because I was getting weird numbers on my test device (non-zero at rest) using UserAccelerometerEvent.
• It helps to catch the phone gently ***
• My math could be complete off... I haven't had anyone else look at this yet... but at least this answer gets you started on a basic theory that works.
• My phone landed in dog poo so I hope you accept this answer.

Limitations on Accuracy:

• The height at which you let go, and catch are naturally going to be inconsistent.
• The threshold is experimental.... test different values yourself. I've settled on 10.
• There is probably some delay between the GO button depress and the timer beginning.
• *** The threshold may not always be detected accurately, or at all if the deceleration ends too quickly because the frequency of accelerometer updates provided by the sensors package is quite low. Maybe there is a way to get updates at a higher frequency with a different package.
• There is always the chance that the GO button could be depressed too early (while the phone is still in your hand) and so the acceleration will be non zero at that time, and perhaps enough to trigger the threshold.
• Probably other things not yet considered.

Code:

It seems that you have multiple @JsonBackReference and @JsonManagedReference in your application and as a consequence, you must provide a name for all pairs as follows:

As of today, coverage.py doesn't support Sonarqube: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1033

Can you try the experiment mentioned on that issue, and report there about what happened? Maybe there's an easy adjustment to make here.