goroutine-leak | an example for debuging golang goroutine leak | Code Inspection library

 by   dockerq Go Version: Current License: Apache-2.0

kandi X-RAY | goroutine-leak Summary

kandi X-RAY | goroutine-leak Summary

goroutine-leak is a Go library typically used in Code Quality, Code Inspection applications. goroutine-leak has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This repo is for debugging goroutine leak.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              goroutine-leak has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 8 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              goroutine-leak has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of goroutine-leak is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              goroutine-leak has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              goroutine-leak has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              goroutine-leak is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              goroutine-leak releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed goroutine-leak and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into goroutine-leak implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • GetContainerLogsInfo returns container logs
            • Main entry point
            • GetContainerLogByID returns container log by ID
            • getMachineID returns the machine ID
            • debugHttp shows the HTTP server
            • timestampSubInterval converts timestamp to a string
            • GetContainers gets a list of containers
            • getUnixTimestamp returns the Unix timestamp
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            goroutine-leak Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for goroutine-leak.

            goroutine-leak Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for goroutine-leak.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Why does reading from a nil channel increase the number of Goroutines?
            Asked 2020-Mar-14 at 17:46

            I'm reading this blog, https://medium.com/golangspec/goroutine-leak-400063aef468, and have adapted the following example illustrating a goroutine leak due to receiving from a nil channel:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Mar-14 at 17:43

            When your app starts, there is already one goroutine that runs the main() function.

            If you don't initialize the ch channel, it will remain its zero value which is nil for channels. Spec: Receive operator:

            Receiving from a nil channel blocks forever.

            For details, see How does a non initialized channel behave?

            So if the channel is nil, the launched goroutine will never end. So you will have 2 goroutines: the main goroutine and the one you launched.

            If you initialize the channel with 1 buffer and send one value on it, then you will also have 2 goroutines for a "short period of time", but the launched goroutine can receive a value from it and then end immediately. So there will be a single goroutine remaining, the main goroutine.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60685465

            QUESTION

            Go goroutines leaking
            Asked 2019-Oct-28 at 21:46

            Following this post about go-routines leaking, https://www.ardanlabs.com/blog/2018/11/goroutine-leaks-the-forgotten-sender.html, i tried to solve my leaking code. But adding a buffer to the channel it did not do the trick.

            My code

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Oct-28 at 21:46

            Here, in the Go Playground, is your original code with a few slight modifications:

            • the delays are reduced, except for time.Sleep(5) which becomes time.Sleep(time.Second);
            • a return is removed because it becomes unnecessary;
            • a fmt.Println is commented out, because with both the return and the uncommented fmt.Println, go vet complains about the unreachable fmt.Println;
            • the channel stored in errChang is changed to unbuffered.

            When run, its output is:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58597199

            QUESTION

            Will this code with unbuffered channel cause goroutine leak in Go?
            Asked 2019-May-28 at 20:07

            I'm writing some golang concurrency codes with goroutines and channels, suspecting that my code may cause goroutine leaks. My situation is similar to the following code, or you can open this go playground link.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-May-28 at 20:07

            The problem with your code is twofold.

            First, there is, theoretically, a goroutine leak since any attempt to send a value to a channel with zero capacity (an unbuffered channel or a filled up buffered channel) blocks the sending goroutine until a receive operation is done on that channel.

            So, yes, by definition of how channels work, all your three goroutines will be blocked in the numChan <- num statement.

            Second, since some revision of Go, an unhandled panic by default dumps only the stack trace of the panicking goroutine. If you wish to dump the stacks of all the active goroutines, you'd have to tweak the runtime — from the documentation of the package runtime:

            The GOTRACEBACK variable controls the amount of output generated when a Go program fails due to an unrecovered panic or an unexpected runtime condition. By default, a failure prints a stack trace for the current goroutine, eliding functions internal to the run-time system, and then exits with exit code 2. The failure prints stack traces for all goroutines if there is no current goroutine or the failure is internal to the run-time. GOTRACEBACK=none omits the goroutine stack traces entirely. GOTRACEBACK=single (the default) behaves as described above. GOTRACEBACK=all adds stack traces for all user-created goroutines. GOTRACEBACK=system is like “all” but adds stack frames for run-time functions and shows goroutines created internally by the run-time. GOTRACEBACK=crash is like “system” but crashes in an operating system-specific manner instead of exiting. For example, on Unix systems, the crash raises SIGABRT to trigger a core dump. For historical reasons, the GOTRACEBACK settings 0, 1, and 2 are synonyms for none, all, and system, respectively. The runtime/debug package's SetTraceback function allows increasing the amount of output at run time, but it cannot reduce the amount below that specified by the environment variable. See https://golang.org/pkg/runtime/debug/#SetTraceback.

            Also note that you must not ever use timers for (simulating) synchronization: in a toy example this might work but in real life nothing prevents your three goroutines from not having a chance to be run during the time span your main goroutine spent in the call to time.Sleep — so the outcome might be that any number of spawned goroutines had run: from 0 to 3.

            Add there the fact that when main exits the runtime merely kills all the outstanding active goroutines, and the result of the test might be surprising at best.

            Hence a proper solution would be to

            • Merely print the stacks where needed,
            • Make sure you synchronize the sends by the matching receives:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56349068

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install goroutine-leak

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/dockerq/goroutine-leak.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone dockerq/goroutine-leak

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:dockerq/goroutine-leak.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Code Inspection Libraries

            Try Top Libraries by dockerq

            docker-ganglia

            by dockerqPHP

            docker-tensorflow

            by dockerqPython

            docker-hdfs

            by dockerqShell