kandi X-RAY | admins Summary
kandi X-RAY | admins Summary
游戏后台管理系统
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Sum computes the sum of a key .
- ScMulAdd modifies a + b
- KeccakF1600 implements the keccakF1600 algorithm .
- Section 12 . 2 . 4 . 5 . 4 .
- ScReduce reduces the number of bits from s to the output .
- Update the buffer .
- Scan a scalar value .
- fe m .
- Parse a node .
- writeStruct writes a struct to w .
admins Key Features
admins Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on admins
QUESTION
I've tried for many hours now and seem to have hit a wall. Any advice/help would be appreciated.
Goal: I want to authorize the express rest-api (ex client-id: "my-rest-api") routes (example resource: "WeatherForecast") across various HTTP methods mapped to client scopes (examples: "create"/"read"/"update"/"delete"). I want to control those permissions through policies (For example - "Read - WeatherForecast - Permission" will be granted if policy "Admin Group Only" (user belongs to admin group) is satisfied.
Rest-api will not log users in (will be done from front end talking directly to keycloak and then they will use that token to talk with rest-api).
Environment:
- Keycloak 15.1.1 running in its own container, port 8080, on docker locally (w/ shared network with rest-api)
- "my-rest-api": Nodejs 16.14.x w/ express 4.17.x server running on its own container on docker locally. Using keycloak-connect 15.1.1 and express-session 1.17.2.
- Currently hitting "my-rest-api" through postman following this guide: https://keepgrowing.in/tools/kecloak-in-docker-7-how-to-authorize-requests-via-postman/
What Happens: I can login from keycloak login page through postman and get an access token. However when I hit any endpoint that uses keycloak.protect() or keycloak.enforce() (with or without specifying resource permissions) I can't get through. In the following code the delete endpoint returns back 200 + the HTML of the keycloak login page in postman and the Get returns back 403 + "Access Denied".
Current State of Realm
- Test User (who I login with in Postman) has group "Admin".
- Client "my-rest-api" with access-type: Confidential with Authorization enabled.
- Authorization set up:
- Policy Enforcement Mode: Enforcing, Decision Strategy: Unanimous
- "WeatherForecast" resource with uri "/api/WeatherForecast" and create/read/update/delete client scopes applied.
- "Only Admins Policy" for anyone in group admin. Logic positive.
- Permission for each of the client scopes for "WeatherForecast" resource with "Only Admins Policy" selected, Decision Strategy: "Affirmative".
Current State of Nodejs Code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-11 at 18:17So my team finally figured it out - the resolution was a two part process:
- Followed the instructions on similar issue stackoverflow question answers such as : https://stackoverflow.com/a/51878212/5117487 Rough steps incase that link is ever broken somehow:
- Add hosts entry for 127.0.0.1 keycloak (if 'keycloak' is the name of your docker container for keycloak, I changed my docker-compose to specify container name to make it a little more fool-proof)
- Change keycloak-connect config authServerUrl setting to be: 'http://keycloak:8080/auth/' instead of 'http://localhost:8080/auth/'
- Postman OAuth 2.0 token request Auth URL and Access Token URL changed to use the now updated hosts entry:
- "http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/abra/protocol/openid-connect/auth" -> "http://keycloak:8080/auth/realms/abra/protocol/openid-connect/auth"
- "http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/abra/protocol/openid-connect/token" -> "http://keycloak:8080/auth/realms/abra/protocol/openid-connect/token"
QUESTION
In my laravel vue application I have two tables, user
table and user_document
table.
In my user_document
table, I have a column called, added_by
.
This column stores the id
s of the users.
There are two roles in my app, admins and general users.
My users can upload documents to the system via vue component. Admin can upload documents for other users as well.
And users can view their already uploaded document details in a datatable.
In that datatable, I'm displaying a column called, Added By
, which shows the users who uploaded the document(the user him self or by the admin).
I have following controller to fetch and display those records.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-11 at 09:03You are doing it wrong here:
QUESTION
What specific syntax or configuration changes must be made in order to resolve the error below in which terraform is failing to create an instance of azuread_application
?
THE CODE:
The terraform code that is triggering the error when terraform apply
is run is as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-07 at 18:35This was a bug, reported as GitHub issue:
The resolution to the problem in the OP is to upgrade the version from 2.5.0
to 2.6.0
in the required_providers
block from the code in the OP above as follows:
QUESTION
I have an ASP.NET Web API with a bunch of controllers and actions. By using EndpointDataSource
I can get a list of all endpoints in the API, which is used during startup to maintain a Controllers and an Actions table. I am going to link these records to a Roles table so I can manage roles to specific actions and controllers without changing the code. This would allow the admin to create custom roles that provide access to these controllers and actions. The API already has a custom authentication mechanism where users are assigned to various roles so I cannot use "standard" solutions for role management. (The login process is a bit complex.)
So I want to create a class attribute [ClassRole]
and a method attribute [ActionRole]
to attach to any action that needs to be managed through roles. So I have this code:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class)]
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-22 at 12:07The AuthorizationFilterContext
class has a property called ActionDescriptor
that holds the detail you require. However, it uses a derived class that is specific to controllers, so you need to cast it to a ControllerActionDescriptor
get at the relevant details. So you can do something like this:
QUESTION
Below is my JSON file
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 17:35i suggest you to create a custom filter to avoid multiple choices:
you create a file myfilter.py
in a folder filter_plugins
(same level your playbook), i have named the plugin customfilter
:
QUESTION
I have multiple containers/images
such as admin(django)
,nginx(httpserver)
my system is here below.
port80-> nginx -> port8011 -> admin
I want to deploy these on fargate
.
However I'm still confused.
Two Image, Two Container,Two task difinition,two loadbalancer it's ok.
However one public IP to only nginx?
How can I connect between container?
Currently my source code is like this below.
I am familiar with docker-compose, but not for aws fargate.
Any help appreciated.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-20 at 13:43How can I connect between container?
In your current configuration you can't connect directly between containers. You would have to have Nginx connect to the internal load balancer that is connected to the Django tasks.
Web Browser -> Public Nginx Load Balancer -> Nginx Container -> Private Django Load Balancer -> Django Container.
I would suggest looking into running both containers in the same ECS task. You would probably save a good bit of money by only having one load balancer and half as many Fargate instances. The traffic flow would look like this:
Web Browser -> Public Load Balancer -> Nginx Container on port 80 -> Django Container on port 8011.
In that scenario you would configure Nginx to proxy requests to 127.0.0.1:8011
. All containers in the same task can connect to each other over 127.0.0.1
inside a Fargate instance. See the Fargate networking documentation here.
A much more advanced setup would be to keep each container running as a separate task, and use AWS App Mesh for internal container communication, instead of internal load balancers. This is probably overkill for your situation, and much more appropriate in a large environment with many microservices deployed independently.
QUESTION
I'm looking for little help with this code, I'm simply trying to get he High Accuracy Lon and Lat, but it keeps coming out with 0.0
What am I missing?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-14 at 10:23Use FutureBuilder instead of calling it inside initState...
QUESTION
I'm trying to direct wagtail
to use a template in a centralised location at the top of the project tree. So for example:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-29 at 18:23Below is how I organize templates and static assets. I have a themes
folder that is located in the main project folder with named theme subfolders within the themes
folder. I then have the following in settings/base.py
:
QUESTION
JupyterHub has various authentication methods, and the one I am using is the PAMAuthenticator, which basically means you log into the JupyterHub with your Linux userid and password.
However, environment variables that I create, like this (or for that matter in those set in my .bashrc
), before running JupyterHub, do not get set within the user's JupyterLab session. As you can see they're available in the console, with or without the pipenv
, and within python itself via os.getenv()
.
However in JupyterHub's spawned JupyterLab for my user (me):
This environment variable myname
is not available even if I export it in a bash session from within JupyterLab as follows:
Now the documentation says I can customize user environments using a Docker container for each user, but this seems unnecessarily heavyweight. Is there an easier way of doing this?
If not, what is the easiest way to do this via Docker?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-20 at 07:39In the jupyterhub_config.py file, you may want to add the environment variables which you need using the c.Spawner.env_keep variable
QUESTION
I'm very new to Laravel,
I was wondering how can we apply some condition on Model.
Suppose there's a field is_public
if this field is false
so then only admins can see this data..
I dont wanna do this on controller with where clauses, as in future I might use the Model in many places, also relations..
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-15 at 18:55I think a good solution would be policies: https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/authorization#creating-policies
Policies are classes that organize authorization logic around a particular model or resource. For example, if your application is a blog, you may have a App\Models\Post model and a corresponding App\Policies\PostPolicy to authorize user actions such as creating or updating posts.
You could create a policy for your model like so:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install admins
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page