go-recaptcha | handling reCaptcha | Form library
kandi X-RAY | go-recaptcha Summary
kandi X-RAY | go-recaptcha Summary
A package for handling reCaptcha (http://www.google.com/recaptcha) form submissions in Go (http://golang.org/).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- check validates the client ip and response
- homePage shows the home page
- Main entry point for the recaptcha public key
- processRequest is a helper function to process the request and validate the response .
- Confirm is used to check the response
- Init initializes the recaptcha private key
go-recaptcha Key Features
go-recaptcha Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on go-recaptcha
QUESTION
I'm working in an existing codebase that uses Django Material. There is a CreateView
defined with a Django Material Layout:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-28 at 13:49Following up on the comment from @Alasdair above which pointed me to the answer, I solved this problem by removing Django Material's LayoutMixin
from CreateView
, creating a Django form with the captcha field defined, and then adding to CreateView
the form_class
for the Django form. Also see my last comment above. It was counterintuitive to me until I looked again at the code after @Alasdair's second comment: the use of LayoutMixin
on the CreateView
isn't necessary for the layout = Layout(...)
on the CreateView
to work.
QUESTION
I'm pretty new to docker and, although I've read lots of articles, tutorials and watched YouTube videos, I'm still finding that my image size is in excess of 1 GB when the alpine image for Python is only about 25 MB (if I'm reading this correctly!).
I'm trying to work out how to make it smaller (if in fact it needs to be).
[Note: I've been following tutorials to create what I have below. Most of it makes sense .. but some of it feels like voodoo]
Here is my Dockerfile:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-05 at 01:39welcome to Docker! It can be quite the thing to wrap one's head around, especially when beginning, but you're asking really valid questions that are all pertinent
Reducing Size How toA great place to start is Docker's own Dockerfile best practices page:
https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/
They explain neatly how your each directve (COPY
, RUN
, ENV
, etc) all create additional layers, increasing your containers size. Importantly, they show how to reduce your image size by minimising the different directives. They key to alot of minimisation is chaining commands in RUN
statements with the use of &&
.
Something else I note in your Dockerfile is one specific line:
QUESTION
Beginner with Django 3.2. I'm trying to add a Recaptcha V3 from Google on my login screen.
- I'am using django-recaptcha3 well configured
- The logo is showing on my login page
- When debugging the json response when calling ReCaptchaField.clean is OK !
The problem is that the form is not validated "'CustomAuthenticationForm' object has no attribute 'cleaned_data'"
Error occured when I do
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-26 at 14:54Two moments here:
username
andpassword
fields in your form data are arrays, this is wrong - you need to check how you make POST request to Django and send strings, not arrays.Since username/pass fields are arrays (not strings) -
form.is_valid
returnsFalse
, and if the form is invalid there will be nocleaned_data
attribute cause it appears only when the form is valid and actually has some valid data.
QUESTION
I am trying to use Recaptcha v3 in one of my projects. Unfortunately the form.valid_date() method fails all the time with "This field is required.".
Running django-recaptcha.
forms.py looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-15 at 11:03I tried to replicate your problem and as you said the form's is_valid()
always returns False
with the error that This field is required.
But after I signed up for a ReCaptcha and change the RECAPTCHA_PUBLIC_KEY
and RECAPTCHA_PRIVATE_KEY
to proper values, the error disappeared and the form.is_vaild()
returns True
.
I assume you're not using real values for these configs and changing that fixes your problem. Or maybe you do put the real values but you're still getting the error. Then I suggest double checking the values. There must be a typo.
QUESTION
I have a problem and I will do the best to explain it, to see if you can help me out.
CONTEXT
I have a system running in a test server, which is set up like a production environment in order to test my code before merging to master and give the go to the production server provider of my client to update the code. This means it runs in DEBUG = False
. All good, all perfect for months.
I decided to activate the ManifestStaticFilesStorage
setting in order to have a hash number added in my static files, I've used it before and it's a good way to break cache rules when updating files (like CSS rules that refuse to load). There is an issue with cache that may be solvable messing around with the server but that's not an option in this case.
Everything went smoothly:
- No issues in collectstatic other than a few missing static files (already solved)
- Static files loaded perfectly
BUT...
THE PROBLEM
This system manages content (images, audio files and custom fonts). When I activated the ManifestStaticFilesStorage
setting, all uploaded files started to throw 404 errors (and some occasional 500 error) in the server access log. Meaning, they look like this:
You can see the broken image icon but you can also see the background colores of each square (color which is injected by JS because it can be customized in the custom CMS). These images are uploaded in the CMS and they live in the media folder configured in the settings file.
Of course, if I go to DEBUG = True
, everything gets fixed (come on! -.-). I went and recreated production enviroment in local, same issue: DEBUG = False
bad, DEBUG = True
works
THOUGHTS
- 404 means the file is not there. Guess what? it's there, they all are
- The occasional 500 means permissions. Well, I haven't changed the permissions. Also, permissiones where the same. Also, I'm using WebFaction, it handles all that for me
- Console in browser says network error. In the Network tab it doesn't even show the 404 errors or the few 500 that may appear
- Broken DB? Nope. Besides, if it were broken,
DEBUG = True
would fail - Apache error log? Nothing to show for. The access log shows the access errors, meaning errors on file that are correctly placed
So, I ran out of ideas. Maybe someone out there has the answer, I hope so. I will still be trying to solve it but I can use the help, please.
RELEVANT CODE
storage.py
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-20 at 20:47Well, after hitting my head to the wall a lot, a good night sleep and fresh ideas, I found the problem. It was the silliest thing ever, as usual.
If you can see in the settings.py, the MEDIA_URL
is set to /media/
. Normally, this wouldn't be a problem in an Apache server but in WebFaction, it turned out to be the culprit of my headache.
For those who don't know, WebFaction obliges you to create apps for everything: Python env, PHP env, Static env, WordPress, Joomla, etc. By creating an app, you have to assing a unique path inside the Website definition, which is a set of apps running under a given domain, so all apps have paths under the same domain and you don't have to modify (in most cases) the httpd.conf
file.
I have an app for the Django code and another app for the static files, under the domain static/
. In the local_settings.py
, you can see that the MEDIA_ROOT
is inside this static path.
In a regular Apache deploy, you just assign the /media/
URL to the path and that's it. In WebFaction, given that there is no static app for using the media/
, the MEDIA_URL
variable has to have static/media
as assigned value when switching to DEBUG = False
.
Just to remember: DEBUG = False
make Django stop serving the static files and leave that entirely to the server where is deployed. So, in DEBUG = True
, it didn't matter which was the media URL because Django is smart enough to see past that. But when I made the switch to DEBUG = False
, it naturally failed.
Silly me, but well, this is how we learn.
Regards.
QUESTION
I am using Docker
to deploy Python2.7
application with Django1.8
.
I am facing some issue from last two days and I found error as below.
Docker Image: python:2.7-slim-buster
Error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-02 at 05:13Django-appconf version 1.0.4 only supports Django 1.11 and up and Python 3.5 and up. (https://github.com/django-compressor/django-appconf/blob/v1.0.4/setup.py). You need to downgrade to at least version 1.0.2 (supports Python 2.6+, doesn't say which django version: https://github.com/django-compressor/django-appconf/blob/v1.0.2/setup.py)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install go-recaptcha
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page