T_old | text editor inspired by the Acme and Sam editors
kandi X-RAY | T_old Summary
kandi X-RAY | T_old Summary
T is a text editor inspired by the Acme and Sam editors of the Plan9 operating system and Plan9 from User Space project. It aims to be much like Acme (see Russ Cox's tour of Acme for a taste).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of T_old
T_old Key Features
T_old Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on T_old
QUESTION
I was building a simple snake game from scratch as practice for PICO-8 and Lua.
I'm attempting to have the body follow the head by creating a copy of the old body locations and update along the length.
I created a t_old
variable to store the original body locations but it is being updated at the same time as t
. I lack an explanation as to why.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-07 at 16:52Table values are copied by reference.
t
and t_old
refer to the same table value.
Read this How do you copy a Lua table by value?
QUESTION
Im am keep getting ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small. Here is what i do.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-30 at 05:34You tried to assign a value to a varchar variable, but the value is larger than the variable can handle.
You are going to select
QUESTION
I have this piece of code (removed just the initialisation of variable that's rather long and outside the parallel region). I am testing it on a local machine (4 physical cores, 8 threads) and comparing speed and result with its serial version. When I run the code with more than 4 threads it seems to incur sometimes in some race condition and the final output (variable T written to disk after the parallel region) is different in the two cases. When I run with 4 or less threads everything is fine, both code run with the same number of iterations and give the final result. From the documentation, there is an implicit synchronisation at the end of each OMP DO block (unless you specify nowait).
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-02 at 16:42Race condition on the reinitialization of the variable change
in the DO WHILE loop has been removed. Solved by initializing change
outside the parallel region and protecting its update in the parallel region with a !$OMP SINGLE
directive.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install T_old
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page