dkim | DKIM signing for Go

 by   eaigner Go Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | dkim Summary

kandi X-RAY | dkim Summary

dkim is a Go library. dkim has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

DKIM signing for Go.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              dkim has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 24 star(s) with 8 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 1 open issues and 1 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 247 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of dkim is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              dkim has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              dkim has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              dkim does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              dkim releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dkim
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            dkim Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for dkim.

            dkim Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for dkim.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Email DNS Setup: How do I make HELO publish an SPF record? SPF_HELO_NONE - SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
            Asked 2022-Apr-10 at 22:48

            My environment: hMailServer 5.6.8 on Windows Server 2022 Standard

            Let's say I have two domains (I don't really own these domains, they're just examples), www.myblog.com and www.mailserver.com. They are both hosted on the same machine and have the same IP address 1.2.3.4.

            The blog site www.myblog.com uses www.mailserver.com to send emails. The site www.mailserver.com only serves as a mail server; it is not accessible from a browser. I have set it up so that when www.myblog.com sends an email to someone, the recipient's email server receives SENT: EHLO www.mailserver.com, but sees SENT: MAIL FROM: message, so the recipient sees that the email came from myblog.com.

            Everything is working fine so far. Recently I decided to check the "spam rating" of my setup at https://www.mail-tester.com. I sent an email to the spam tester using the setup described above, and I saw a warning under the SpamAssassin section that says

            SPF_HELO_NONE        SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record

            My question is, how do I get rid of this warning? Are the DNS records as they should be? See below for the DNS records for each domain.

            The DNS records for each domain are as follows (note the PTR record for 1.2.3.4):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Apr-10 at 22:48

            I was able to get rid of the warning by adding an extra TXT record with the name "www" to the www.mailserver.com DNS:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71786859

            QUESTION

            nodemailer is giving errors in Nextjs app
            Asked 2022-Mar-23 at 09:51

            i have built a simple mailing app using nextjs and nodemailer, while watching a youtube tutorial And i did exaclty everything in the tutorial, but i am getting errors i have no idea how to troubleshoot. below is my code, kindly help and advise on how i sholud go about these errors

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-23 at 09:51

            nodemailer is a Node.js library and cannot be used in the client side. That's why you see the error Can't resolve 'fs'.

            What you may do instead is to create an API route(which will be performed in the server side) and have the client app calls the API to perform the mailing task.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71584073

            QUESTION

            E-Mails of PHPMailer still getting into SPAM on some clients even after adding SPF-record
            Asked 2022-Mar-18 at 17:17

            So I developed an automated Mailing System through which I send automated e-mails in PHP using the PHPMailer Extension.

            First, most of the e-mails I've sent with the PHPMailer dropped into the spam of several clients, a well-known issue. I've checked with my host and we created an SPF record; and the result improved a lot.

            Now by coincidence, I've found that some clients still seem to drop messages received via the PHPMailer script into their Spam folder. If I send the same e-mail manually, it doesn't happen, so it seems to be related to PHPMailer; so I must be doing something wrong.

            The configs / code I'm currently using are / is :

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-18 at 17:17

            Whether mail ends up in spam is very difficult to control. Implementing SPF and DKIM can help, but still provide no guarantees. If it was easy to bypass spam filters, spammers would do it, and they would not be spam filters! There's an article in the PHPMailer wiki about avoiding spam filters that you may find helpful. The headers in a received message will often tell you why a message has been put in the spam folder, for example listing the spamassassin rules it matched.

            You say it works "manually", but is that sending from the same place (e.g. on your local machine)? You can get the raw text of messages sent through each route and compare them to see what's different (other than obvious things like message IDs).

            That MailGun article is outdated. Since then, RFC8314 has not only "undeprecated" port 465, it's now recommended as the default because it eliminates a possible attack vector in the pre-encryption stage that SMTP+STARTTLS uses on port 587. Unfortunately it also makes it harder to debug from PHP, and denies the chance to do opportunistic encryption when encryption is not requested explicitly, so it's not the default in PHPMailer (yet).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71530631

            QUESTION

            DKIM validation warning when sending e-mail from Sendgrid API
            Asked 2022-Feb-18 at 09:43

            I've bought a domain and I'm hosting Cloudflare as my DNS host. I mainly use this domain for sending emails.

            I use Google workspace for receiving and sending emails, but I also use the Sendgrid API to send one automatic email a day from a simple python program (using Sendgrid's python library) I keep running.

            I have correctly authenticated my domain in Sendgrid and added the CNAME records to Cloudflare as Sendgrid advises. I have also configured Google correctly with my domain using their info. I've tested both configurations with their tools.

            I'm now in the process of adding extra security to my emails. I've configured SPF, DMARC and DKIM using the simple instructions Google provides. Added all the records once again to my DNS provider (Cloudflare) and started to observe my daily DMARC reports.

            I'm using URIports (https://app.uriports.com/) to make sense of these reports :P

            Apparently, everything is ok with the mails I send from Google. But not ok with the emails sent via Sengrid. The DMARC analysis is the following:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-18 at 09:43

            To set your mind at ease, your setup is fine! Nothing to worry about.

            DKIM is, among other things a reputation tool. SendGrid is adding two signatures to your emails, one for your domain, which will help pass DMARC authentication. And one for their domain / service. This second one is optional from the DMARC perspective, but may improve Inbox delivery.

            There are many services that operate in a similar fashion, adding an additional DKIM signature to outbound emails.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71150656

            QUESTION

            This message does not have authentication information or fails to 550-5.7.26 pass authentication checks
            Asked 2022-Feb-18 at 09:28

            I have problem with google and I can't send email to any gmail or Gsuite emails got report from mail server log

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-17 at 12:00

            That is odd. The sending source IP is definitely in your SPF, and the DMARC record includes aspf=r, so the header from address in a child domain is valid and matches. I'd also note that your DMARC has p=quarantine, but gmail is acting like it's reject. This is gmail though, so you can't expect it to behave well.

            I expect that the problem is that you don't have an SPF record set for server.cbs-canon.com, so make sure that exists and allows the same sources as cbs-canon.com. It looks like you're not doing DKIM signatures either, meaning that both SPF and DKIM are failing, resulting in a DMARC failure. Try adding that DNS record, or redirecting/including server. to your root domain.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71157383

            QUESTION

            Extract from an email header the Authentication-Results part using an Outlook Add-in with OfficeJS
            Asked 2022-Feb-08 at 22:26

            I've been trying to the section of Authentication-Results First I tried with:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-08 at 22:26

            Basically, your operating system defines the character / character sequence for the end of the line. Your particular application might or might not follow that.

            If you want to limit the change to your initial regex, adding \r is (to me) the most straightforward approach. If you want to limit the number of characters in your regex, you could go for \s -- which would encompass blank, \n and \r - but \t as well, which is not allowed at this time.

            Talking of potential simplification: Within the character class (between the square brackets), escaping round brackets/parentheses and the dot / full stop is usually not required - leaving you with
            ^Authentication-Results:[0-9a-zA-Z =().\n\r;-]*
            But you need to verify in your particular environment.

            Please comment, if and as this requires adjustment / further detail.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71023413

            QUESTION

            permission related issues dovecot postfix
            Asked 2022-Feb-06 at 20:55

            I have the following error message in the dovecot errors & warnings log after I've tried to rebuild my mail server.

            Prior to these errors, I updated my aging system to the latest, and lots of things broke. The configuration was confetti, so I attempted to rebuild the mail server. To get this error, I simply login to Roundcube mail. I'm able to login, however I cant see any emails.

            I'm seeing two issues in the error, just not sure how to fix it.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-06 at 19:50

            You state "This is not the correct directory, it should be /var/vmail/nostalgicmail.com/brad". Your (helpfully supplied) config contains,

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71010351

            QUESTION

            How to setup minimal smtp server on localhost to send messages to other smtp servers
            Asked 2022-Feb-05 at 07:42

            Honestly, I think I have a fundamental gap in understanding how SMTP works. I can't seem to find a good explanation of what is happening behind the scenes and I think this is preventing me from being able to do what I am attempting to do.

            To explain, I'm trying to setup an application which sends notifications to users by connecting to an SMTP server. Fair enough. I figure, since I'm using my own domain, I have SPF/DKIM/DMARC configured, I can add an MX record for the host I set the application up on (my SPF record has the mx keyword to authorize any hosts in my MX records to send/receive mails). Then, I can have that same host run a super lightweight SMTP server that can accept mails from the application, and send them on to recipients.

            Almost crucially, I want this server to basically just run on localhost so that only this application can connect and send mails through it, but so that it can't really "receive" mails sent to my domain (I have set the MX priority very low (well, a high number) for this app server). I figure since I'm running my own SMTP server, that I don't really need to authenticate against it (it's running on localhost), just take in any mail and send it on to recipient domains.

            When sending on to recipient domains... does the SMTP server need to authenticate to say, the gmail SMTP server as a user in order to send mails over there? That seems weird, since it's not a user logging into gmail to send mails, it's an SMTP server that is authorized within SPF sending mail from my domain (From address from my domain as well) to where ever the app server user's email is based (in this example, the user would be e.g., some_user@gmail.com).

            I tried using python's aiosmtpd command-line and telnet to send a mail from test@MY_DOMAIN.TLD to test@MY_DOMAIN.TLD and it didn't seem to deliver the message; I figured aiosmtpd would connect to the preferred MX servers for my domain (my "real" MX's) to transfer the message, which would then put it in my inbox. That didn't seem to be the case, and I'm not sure why.

            Exact repro steps, where example.com is my domain, and terminals are running on a box with a hostname listed in my MX records.

            Terminal A:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-25 at 18:18

            It sounds like you want to run a mail transfer agent (MTA) that relays email to remote SMTP servers. An MTA will typically act as an SMTP server to receive messages, and then it will act as an SMTP client when it relays the messages to remote hosts.

            MTAs generally operate in two different modes: (1) They will relay messages from authenticated users to remote hosts, and (2) they will receive messages from remote hosts to its users and store them somehow. The combination of those two modes - where the MTA will accept messages from remote hosts and relay them to different remote hosts - is called an open relay and is sure to attract spammers and place your server on spam blacklists.

            aiosmtpd is not an MTA or an email relay out of the box - it is merely an SMTP server that will receive messages and do whatever with the messages you program it to do. By default it will do nothing - that is, it will receive the messages and throw them away. If you want to implement an email relay in aiosmtpd, then you need to implement the SMTP client portion of the MTA, e.g. by implementing an aiosmtpd handler that instantiates smtplib.SMTP to connect to remote hosts.

            However, if all you want is an email relay, then you most likely don't need aiosmtpd at all - postfix is probably a better choice.

            aiosmtpd can be a good choice if you need to implement mailing list software or perform some automation tasks based on incoming emails from e.g. cameras or scanners.

            If you want to implement an email relay in aiosmtpd, then you need to ensure that both the software and your server are configured in a way that you don't relay unauthenticated messages from the outside internet.

            See also: Python aiosmtpd - what is missing for an Mail-Transfer-Agent (MTA)?

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70781775

            QUESTION

            Parse multipart/related emails
            Asked 2022-Jan-11 at 12:39

            I'm trying to parse emails and convert tables within them into pandas dataframes. Since some of the emails are multipart, I took some code from this answer.

            The following code works fine but it breaks with multipart/related emails (no tables are found).

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 12:39

            you want to parse text/html parts

            you should check for content type == 'text/html'

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70640872

            QUESTION

            Why do DKIM public keys always end with 'IDAQAB'?
            Asked 2021-Dec-15 at 10:03

            I have noticed that all the DKIM public keys generated always end with the string 'IDAQAB'. Any reason to it or are there cases where DKIM public keys will not end with the same string all the time ?.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-15 at 10:03

            DKIM public keys are encoded in the binary DER format and shared as Base64 in the DNS. RSA public keys consist of a modulus and an exponent. The exponent is typically 65537, which is 01 00 01 in hexadecimal. DER prefixes this value with 02 for the integer type and 03 for the length of the exponent in bytes. The Base64 encoding of 02 03 01 00 01 is IDAQAB (at the right offset).

            Before the modulus, which is unique for each RSA public key, there are nested length prefixes and an object identifier. This information is identical for RSA keys of the same length, which is why you find many DKIM public keys which also share the same prefix, such as MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70346260

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install dkim

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/eaigner/dkim.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone eaigner/dkim

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:eaigner/dkim.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link