smbus | smbus provides access to the System Management bus over I2C | Web Framework library
kandi X-RAY | smbus Summary
kandi X-RAY | smbus Summary
smbus provides access to the System Management bus, over I2C.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Open returns a new device .
- crc8 returns the checksum of the given buffer
- OpenFile opens a file for writing .
- ioctl interface
- WriteByte writes a byte to the connection .
- EPROM returns an argument that sets the EEPROM option .
- DevAddr returns an option that sets the DevAddr option .
- I2CAddr sets the I2C address
- convI16 converts lsb to an int16 .
smbus Key Features
smbus Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on smbus
QUESTION
for a school project i need to make a Tkinter Gui that controls certain leds and etc.
this is a part of my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-30 at 15:22Put everything in a frame and use pack()
on the frame to put it on the top middle of the window:
QUESTION
I need to change value in MLX96014 temperature sensors eeprom with raspberry pi and python. I can read its ram and eeprom without problems, but I cant write to it. Also every python MLX96014 library that I find dont have this function implemented for some reason. I tried to do this with arduino and it works great with this function:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-30 at 17:43I dont know exactly why provided python code doesnt work but I have tried other i2c library and it started working. Here is the code snippet:
QUESTION
I've got a problem with PEC on STM32 SMBUS, which i use to read data from a MLX90614 IR thermometer. When i start the device, either the PECERR flag is set and continues to be set, for all transmissions, even though the data from the IR thermometer seems to be correct. Or the PECERR is never set and all the data from the IR thermometer is still correct.
When i study the data on my oscilloscope i can see no difference between the signals when the PECERR is set or not. As stated earlier data seems to be good either way.
I could of course just ignore the PECERR flag, but i'd lige to be able to filter out any eventual garbled transmissions. Anyone have an idea what i am doing wrong here?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-04 at 12:29Found the bug. PECERR must be cleared by software. The first transmission after power on occasionally fails.
QUESTION
I want to create an UML from a little Program i wrote. So far i only made UML Diagrams for Java Program and its quite new for me to draw one for python. The thing is, that there is a Writer - "Interface" e.g. a class that inherits from abc.ABCMeta and implements the abstract method write(). This interface is implemented in two classes. A Database class and a CSVWriter Class. The constuctor e.g. the init() method of another class called DataCollector, takes a Class that had implemented the Writer Interface as an argument. The instance CSVWriter or Database will then be stored as an instance variable inside a DataCollector object.
How do i show this relationship within a UML? Python does not really have interfaces. To me it seems that it just inherits from the "interface". I tried a UML and i aggregated the DataCollector with the WriterInterface. Is it ok to use an aggregation between an interface and a class or do i have to draw aggregations between the Classes that implement the interface and the Class DataCollector?
This is how i draw it so far:
The code the UML is based on:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-05 at 13:26it ok to use an aggregation between an interface and a class
yes, this is the right way
do i have to draw aggregations between the Classes that implement the interface and the Class DataCollector
no, for several reasons :
the goal of the interface is to hide the effective implementations, having a relation to each implementing classes reveal the implementations with all the associated consequences
new classes implementing the interface can appears later, you do not want to need to add a relation modifying DataCollector to a new one each time it appears
DataCollector has only one writers, if you have several relations they need to be exclusives, this is a complicated way for nothing
QUESTION
As I'm rather new to Cmake usage, I don't really know how to solve this problem. In my C++ code, I use functions from the Linux i2c library, as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-15 at 18:31The answer is, you can use the command target_link_libraries() after creating the executable. You have to provide the name of the object and a path to the .so-file (usually found in /usr/lib). In my case, that would be:
QUESTION
I'm trying to read a block of data from an imu (mpu9250) but when building with
g++ mpu.cpp -o mpu
i get the following error:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-31 at 09:50The solutions was:
1. Using extern C: I was using extern C, but included them in the regular way as well and that caused the problem.
QUESTION
I am using the Sensirion SFM3300 flow sensor and can read the correct values with the Arduino with the following code (I2C):
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-18 at 14:54I don't think your read process in python is correct. Reading from port 40 two times is different from reading two bytes from port 40.
I suggest to use read_byte_data(0x40, 0, 2) and process that with struct.unpack(">H")
.
QUESTION
My python package depends on a c extension that, in turn, makes use of numpy's arrayobject.h
. I built the image without the package and confirmed that this file exists: /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/numpy/core/include
. I also patched distutil's setup.py
as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-12 at 13:15The simple answer is to specify the dependency on the native (target) numpy:
QUESTION
I have a Raspberry Pi Zero W acting as a Master in communication with an Arduino Pro Mini acting as a Slave. I would like for the Master to send commands to the Slave. However, when I try using commands such as bus.write_byte_data or bus.write_byte from the Master, the Slave only ever seems to receive the value 255. Here's the code:
Master (in Python):
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-20 at 12:54You're probably trying to use a handler created by Wire.onRequest instead of one created by Wire.onReceive. An onReceive handler will do what you want:
QUESTION
I have 2 VL6180X Distance Sensors properly connected to a TCA9548A Multiplexer, however it only recognizes the Multiplexer itself and not the 2 sensors as you can see with the 0x70. Is there any way to configure the i2c adresses?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-13 at 08:33Luca's answer is better than this, though this should still work.
It doesn't work like that. You can't "see" the attached devices through the multiplexer.
Instead, you open the multiplexer and write a "control byte" to it, to tell it which device it should forward the following data to.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install smbus
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page