git-br | simple interactive cli tool to handle your local git | Command Line Interface library
kandi X-RAY | git-br Summary
kandi X-RAY | git-br Summary
A very simple interactive cli tool to handle your local git branches
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- newTuiUI returns a tui . UI .
- ChangesToString returns a string representation of the changes .
- extract extracts all branches from a git repository .
- main is the main entry point for UI
- Open opens a git repo
- String returns a string representation of the branch .
git-br Key Features
git-br Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on git-br
QUESTION
In my project I'm using Jhipster Spring Boot and I would like to start 2 instances of one microservise at the same time, but on different instances of a database (MongoDB).
In this microservice I have classes, services, rests that are used for collections A, B C,.. for which now I would like to have also history collections A_history, B_history, C_history (that are structured exactly the same like A, B, C) stored in separated instance of a database. It makes no sense to me to create "really separated" microservice since I would have to copy all logic from the first one and end up with doubled code that is very hard to maintain. So, the idea is to have 2 instances of the same microservice, one for A, B, C collections stored in "MicroserviceDB" and second for A_history, B_history, C_history collections stored in "HistoryDB".
I've tried with creating 2 profiles, but when I start from a command line History microservice, it is started ok, but if I also try to start "original" microservice at the same time, it is started but immediately history service becomes "original" microservice. Like they cannot work at the same time.
Is this concept even possible in microservice architecture? Does anyone have an idea how to make this to work, or have some other solution for my problem?
Thanks.
application.yml
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-20 at 09:18In general, this concept should be easily achievable with microservices and a suiting configuration. And yes, you should be able to use profiles to define different database connections so that you can have multiple instances running.
I assume you are overwriting temporary build artifacts, that's why it is not working somehow. But that is hard to diagnose from distance. You might consider using Docker containers with a suiting configuration to increase isolation in this regard.
QUESTION
I tried to set PS1
in the bash_profile as,
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-22 at 11:12If you want to change the prompt for Zsh:
PROMPT="⚡️%{$fg[red]%} ☣︎☯︎⚰︎☤⚚♱♚☨☥☥☨♚♱⚚☤⚰︎☯︎☣︎ %{$fg[red]%}⚡%{$fg[green]%}%T⚡️%{$fg[green]%}%{$fg[yellow]%}%d%{$fg[yellow]%} ⚡️"
^This is just an example of the difference between bash and zsh when setting prompt.^
for your case check this link:
https://www.themoderncoder.com/add-git-branch-information-to-your-zsh-prompt/
or change to bash using:
chsh -s /bin/sh
QUESTION
We already have plugins installed for the bitbucket server and sonarqube in Jenkins and We ran the sonar using this command in the Jenkinsfile
I also followed this community topic:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-17 at 06:32It's hard to provide an answer that addresses your specific issues, as you haven't provided much information. However, I can give you some background on how this is typically done.
Concerning what you've provided, you cite a document about decorating pull requests, which has a lot of information. It's not clear at all which error you are referring to.
The way you use SonarQube and Jenkins to block the merging of pull requests if SonarQube has "errors", is with the Quality Gate, and the configuration of the BitBucket repository.
You define the SonarQube quality gate with rules for when the scan is to be defined as "failing". For instance, you can define a minimum percentage of unit test code coverage, or the maximum number of vulnerabilities, or other issue types.
In Jenkins, you need to use the "withSonarQubeEnv()" and "waitForQualityGate()" pipeline steps. The former specifies the name of the SonarQube instance to use, which extracts the SonarQube credentials and url from the Jenkins configuration (you should define them in the Jenkins configuration, not in the build job, as you have done). The latter waits for SonarQube to produce the quality gate analysis, which is performed in a background job in SonarQube. When the background job completes, it will call the "Webhook", the url of which has to be configured in SonarQube, to point to Jenkins (often something like "http://{jenkinshost}:{jenkinsport}/jenkins/sonarqube-webhook"). In the Jenkins pipeline script, you check the return value from "waitForQualityGate()", and if the "status" property of that object is not equal to "OK", then the quality gate failed, and your script should call "error" to fail the build.
QUESTION
I am building an Azure pipeline for a GitHub web site to run on Windows Self-Hosted agents. The default branch for the GitHub project is develop, all developers commit to this branch. I want a script that will merge develop to release for the time where a version is on tests and merge release to master once in production.
I'm new with git commands, I know the pipeline runs under a service account on the agent, behind a proxy and the pipeline impersonate somehow to another account to connect to GitHub.
To test my script, I logged onto the server as the service account and ran the following commands:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-07 at 09:13Run the following command in the cmd task of the pipeline:
QUESTION
The team I'm on at work is working at developing competence at branching strategies using Git. We've previously used TFVC but want to move to Git. At this point it's our intention to use Azure DevOps Services for both source control and the build/release using Azure Pipelines.
I've been reading up on branching strategies using Git. I came across the Adopt a Git Branching Strategy page and other related pages. Incredibly valuable information there! However, I do have one important question which is a consequence of our environment. All our licenses to things like Microsoft 365, Visual Studio, MSDN licensing, etc., is tied to an email address ending in nmhealth.org. However, for reasons which I'm not privy to, that's not actually our work email addresses. My work email address is on domain state.nm.us. In essence, although all our licensing is through nmhealth.org, there is no email inbox there. All email has to go through everyone's state.nm.us email. But if we set up things like who's going to review PRs, how do we do that in Azure DevOps Pipelines? Everyone's account in Azure Pipelines is associated with their nmhealth.org. At this point when we make up policies in Azure Pipelines concerning PRs, such as reviewers, no one will ever get an email informing them that they should review a new PR.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-02 at 07:54People can set an alternate email address in their profile.
If your account is linked to AAD, that email should automatically flow from Azure Active Directory, if the contact email is configured there.
You can also edit your notification subscription settings and set an alternate email address for a specific notification class:
This is only possible for non-default subscriptions. So you may need to disable a global notification and create a personal notification subscription in order to set the custom email address.
You can recognize the global subscriptions by the 🌐 icon.
QUESTION
I have a master branch and dev branch, i also confirmed by checking by git-branch.
In my master branch there is current working version of the code.
I created new branch dev and then rebased to dev branch
Now I have the same files in master and dev branch and i planned to work on dev branch. the reason doing like this pushing to dev branch can be done without reviews and pushing to master needs review.
I havent done any changes in dev branch as of now but wanted to push this to dev branch as everyone can see this dev branch . then i get error like (this below error came when i did git push origin dev)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-29 at 15:05The "dev" branch doesn't exit on Gerrit, you just created it locally in your machine.
When you pushed to "refs/heads/dev" you tried to create the "dev" branch on Gerrit but you don't have permission to create branches. You need to have "Create Reference" permission on "refs/*".
It's not possible to push to "refs/for/dev" (create a review on Gerrit) because the "dev" branch doesn't exist in Gerrit (see 1. above).
QUESTION
Just got this message from Apple this morning:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-20 at 14:48You should double-check your Info.plist, You might have included something like this Privacy - Tracking Usage Description
QUESTION
There is a project on GitHub with 2 branches:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-24 at 11:36My preferred way of working with remotes is to never use pull
, but always use fetch
followed by a merge
/rebase
. pull
does the same behind the scenes, but I like to be able to inspect the history before that.
Fetch from all remotes, checkout your branch, rebase your branch:
QUESTION
I am working on Azure pipelines, running on Windows Self-hosted agents.
We have a yaml pipeline that gets triggered manually, build the project, create an artifact and deploy to our staging environment.
Currently it works, it gets the develop branch from github and do as mentionned.
I want to change this so the develop branch gets merged to a release branch, we reuse always the same release branch while the version gets to PROD. In a future step, after an approval, the release branch should get merged to the master branch. I don't know git very well, I used SourceSafe for many years.
I don't know which approach is best:
#1
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-15 at 04:58You're on the right track.
You'll want to update your git command to include "origin" before the branch name and you'll probably want to push the changes after running your pull, or they'll just remain staged locally on the Build Agent.
This should do the trick:
QUESTION
For educational (Q.A.) purposes, I'm creating a series of git coding exercises that force students to create a merge conflicts in different ways and practice solving them.
I'm wondering if there are other ways common, or even uncommon ways such as working stash, locked files, etc.
Similar Resources (not duplicates):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-22 at 19:45One way to automate this is with bash:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install git-br
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page