webapi | Go Lang Web Assembly bindings for DOM , HTML etc | Binary Executable Format library

You most likely don't want to call getData on every render, so you should store the response somewhere, it might be in the component state:

You should use http://localhost:55643/api/ShipmentsStatus/getShipmentsStatusJSON or change [Route("getShipmentsStatusJSON")] to the appropriate API method name

Edited (I missed the part where you fallback on TryGetFormCredentials)

It seems like you need to send the form data as application/x-www-form-urlencoded. See the RFC

I think you need to explicitly create Func delegate in this case, otherwise F# compiler cannot distinguish between the two overloads.

The type of the second argument (in the basic case) is Func<'T> i.e. a function taking unit and returning the value to be cached. This also means that, inside this function, you should call doAPIStuff with the parameters as arguments.

Assuming this is in some actualRequest handler that takes some, parameters, the following should work:

I found the solution in this blog post. Thanks @juunas for this

To solve my issue I've kept the code from the initial question to hide controller methods. To hide controllers I've implemented a IActionModelConvention:

I found out answer after trying for 3 days. posting here as this may help some one. Basically in this scenario you don't need to do anything in the client side, data will be passed to the api from kendo async save method, from API we have to use FileStream and CopyToAsync for creating the file in a physical location

When I see Stack Trace of the exception it had this message: Anonymously Hosted DynamicMethods Assembly. In one part of my code, In PayIssueVoucherController I have used method which returns dynamic value:

Just use string handling

It's not possible to set the tags using the AzureResourceManagerTemplateDeployment@3 task with the deploymentScope set to Resource Group, as documented here there are no parameters that do that. However, it is possible if you change the deploymentScope to Subscription but this will require you to refactor your template as a Subscription template. This will allow you to define the Resource Group inside the template, along with it's tags, rather than relying on the AzureResourceManagerTemplateDeployment@3 task to create it.

There's documentation on Subscription templates here but in short you will need to:

• add a resource to your template to define the Resource Group
• move the resources that are currently defined in the template to linked templates and replace them with Deployment resources that deploy those linked templates

If your ARM templates are stored in a public repo that should be straightforward, if not you'll need to make them accessible over https in some way. In the past I've used an Azure storage account and granted access to the files using a SAS token but there are many other ways to solve that problem.