terraform-provider-azurerm | Terraform provider for Azure Resource Manager | Azure library
kandi X-RAY | terraform-provider-azurerm Summary
kandi X-RAY | terraform-provider-azurerm Summary
Terraform provider for Azure Resource Manager
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of terraform-provider-azurerm
terraform-provider-azurerm Key Features
terraform-provider-azurerm Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on terraform-provider-azurerm
QUESTION
In Terraform, I'm trying to get my App Service to connect to a storage account so that it can read files for the main website.
I've been following the guide on HashiCorp today: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/azurerm/latest/docs/resources/app_service#access_key
Here it mentions to be able to do this it has to connect via an access key, this is where it gets confusing. I found a working example here: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/10435
Yet mine errors and I think its to do with the key, I first tried doing it via a customer managed key then a data source and now I'm just very confused on how to actually get this to work.
Once again the Terraform Docs are limited at best.
Here is my Code:
Website App Code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-15 at 21:30If you are giving name = azurerm_storage_account.website_installers_account.id
in storage account block for your then it will give the below error . So , you have to give a name to it only which you want to set like WebsiteStorageConnectionString
.
And for the second error that you get as below because we can't use Azure Blobs on Windows App Service ,It is a limitation from Microsoft end as mentioned in this Microsoft Document.So, as a solution you can use kind = linux
in app service plan block or you can create a file share and use it with app service if you don't want to change kind.
Solutions:
- Creating a file share instead of Container and Using AzureFiles instead of Azure blobs.
QUESTION
Trying to Create AKS which is behind Proxy, AKS failed to launch Worker Node in node pool, failing with connection timeout error, https://mcr.microsoft.com/ 443
Tried using below argument but getting error https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/azurerm/latest/docs/resources/kubernetes_cluster#http_proxy_config
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-23 at 13:12You will have to declare the http_proxy
, https_proxy
and no_proxy
inside the http_proxy_config
block in azurerm_kubernetes_cluster
resource block.
The code will be like below :
QUESTION
I created a new Trigger for my Datafactory Pipeline using Terraform's azurerm_data_factory_trigger_schedule provider key.
The trigger is meant to kick off every 4th of the month, 13:00 UTC.
However, the Status doesn't automatically get set to Started after deployment. Following the changes made on this PR to support activated property,
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/pull/13390
I added activated to my TF script. Current TF script looks as such:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-01 at 12:36This has been confirmed as a bug
from Terraform side as when we are using activated = true
, the schedule block
doesn't seem to be working and errors out .
When activated is not provided as parameter and schedule is used, then instead of being by default true it sets to false.
Details for the Bug Fix and Bug can be found on this Github Issue and Pull request
QUESTION
What specific syntax must be changed below in order for the terraform cli to return only one
json
object describing state instead of 4json
objects?
The command we are currently running is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-25 at 18:07This is not a standard terraform show --json
output. I suspect that you set TF_LOG to DEBUG
or INFO
. Thus you have to change that env variable to normal value. For example, if you run it in bash
on linux you can change it in one line as follows:
QUESTION
My team is attempting to create an Azure App Service that uses Windows Docker Containers, using Terraform.
I have tested the docker-basic example, from the Terraform GitHub project, to successfully create a Linux Docker App Service.
Next, I used the Terraform documentation for the azurerm_app_service and azurerm_app_service_plan, to change the main.tf
file to one that will create a Windows Docker App Service, with a Windows IIS Docker image. Here is the updated main.tf
file:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-13 at 08:14I tried the code given by you in my lab.
The Major difference while creating in Portal and Terraform was that in portal it takes bydeafult as “Isxenon:true”
and kind as “app,container,windows”
even for a windows docker container . But while creating a windows docker container using terraform it takes “isxenon :false”
and kind as “app”
that’s why it gives a stack setting bydefault as a code based app.
Second thing is that Xenon is not supported in standard Sku, it should be premiumv3 Sku.
So while deploying a windows docker container make the following changes to the code :
In the App service plan: Kind = “xenon”, Is_xenon = true, Sku tier = premiumv3 Size = p1v3
Then the main.tf file will be like this
QUESTION
Trying to integrate my azure signalr service with a private endpoint, the below is the sample terraform code that I'm trying
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 07:58After my validation, you could change to use signalr
instead of signalR
in your code.
subresource_names = ["signalr"]
QUESTION
Terraform is throwing an error "Failure sending request: StatusCode=429 -- Original Error: context deadline exceeded" when creating over 2000 A and CNAME records on Azure.
Tried Terraform v0.13.5 and v0.14, same error
Using version 2.39 of the azurerm plugin
An example of my terraform code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-06 at 01:36If you create all your resources azurerm_dns_zone
and azurerm_resource_group
in the same .tf
file. I suggest instead of hardcode the value, you can change your terraform template like this:
QUESTION
In the following example:
We have this code snippet:
In line 57, where the value of data.azurerm_subscription.primary.id
is coming from? I am asking since The data block in the line 53 is empty.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-10 at 19:51If you check the data source documentation it doesn't require any input. The only optional argument is subscription_id
:
If this argument is omitted, the subscription ID of the current Azure Resource Manager provider is used.
Which depends on the way you authenticate with Azure.
If you're using Azure CLI, it should resolve to your Azure CLI default subscription (which you can find out with az account show
).
QUESTION
I've noticed that the value of the Custom Domain Verification Id seems to be the same across many of my app services, app service plans, and azure regions in my Azure Subscription. I can't see any documentation as to whether confirming this observation. Is the Custom Domain Verification shared across an Azure subscription?
I'm referring to this Custom domain Verification ID in an Azure App Service
For context, I'm automating the creation of our Azure App Services and Amazon Route 53 domains using Terraform. At the time of writing the Custom Domain Verification Id is not available from the Azure Provider.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-12 at 07:22If you care about whether these values are same under the same subcription, the answer is yes. This is a default value.
When you add the costom domain, app service will use this value to check whether the value is the same as the value in domain name provider. When they are the same, app service will know you are the owner of this domain and allow you to add.
This value is mainly used to verify whether you are the owner of the domain. If you purchase the domain in your subscription, you do not need to consider adding this value to the domain name service provider. Azure will provide this value when you purchase the domain name to domain name providers.
QUESTION
I'm building a Terraform config for my infrastructure deployment, and trying to connect an azurerm_mariadb_server resource to an azurerm_subnet, using an azurerm_mariadb_virtual_network_rule, as per documentation.
The vnet, subnet, mariadb-server etc are all created, but I get the following when trying to create the vnet_rule.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-23 at 09:25The key point is that
Support for VNet service endpoints is only for General Purpose and Memory Optimized servers.
So change the code sku_name = "B_Gen5_2"
to sku_name = "GP_Gen5_2"
or other eligible sku_name
.
sku_name - (Required) Specifies the SKU Name for this MariaDB Server. The name of the SKU, follows the tier + family + cores pattern (e.g. B_Gen4_1, GP_Gen5_8). For more information see the product documentation.
It takes a few minutes to deploy.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install terraform-provider-azurerm
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page