unseal | command line tool to unseal multiple Hashicorp Vault | Identity Management library

I understand that proxies require virtual navigation properties in order to add the desired behavior, but is there no way to do this with shadow properties?

Currently (up to v6.0 inclusive) EF Core does not support shadow navigation properties.

I'm encountering problems with EF Core 5.0 when I try to map a many-to-many relationship with a CLR navigation property on one end of the relationship only.

As explicitly stated at the beginning of the Many-to-many documentation:

Many-to-many relationships require a collection navigation property on both sides.

There are plans to add support for single side skip navigation (unidirectional) many-to-many relationships in the future, but currently this is a limitation (and requirement for your model).

This works fine, until I enable change tracking proxies or lazy-loading proxies.

As mentioned above, what you are doing is not supported. You just found a backdoor in 5.0 which btw is closed in 6.0, so in 6.0 such model configuration simply throws InvalidOperationException saying

Unable to set up a many-to-many relationship between 'Answer.Duplicates' and 'Question.Answers' because one or both of the navigations don't have a corresponding CLR property. Consider adding a corresponding private property to the entity CLR type.

even without tracking or lazy loading proxies.

Shortly, whether you want it or not, the proper way until they add support for what you are asking for is to simply follow their requirements and put collection navigation properties on both sides.

Your are confusing EF, it thinks you want to use JObject for an Sql Data type, obviously it's complaining for good reason.

Either use the NotMapped attribute with a real backing property, or even better, use a value converter:

Value converters allow property values to be converted when reading from or writing to the database. This conversion can be from one value to another of the same type (for example, encrypting strings) or from a value of one type to a value of another type (for example, converting enum values to and from strings in the database.)

If you want to do the testing only why don't you use the vault in dev mode?

As per the Official Document of Hashicorp , It seems to be expected behavior .

When you seal your vault's status will be Recovery Seal Type : azurekeyvault and Sealed : true But after the vault operator is initialized the vault's status will be Recovery Seal Type : shamir and sealed : false as per auto-unseal feature.

Reference:

Auto-unseal using Azure Key Vault | Vault - HashiCorp Learn

You ran kubeseal against the wrong Kubernetes cluster or you tried to edit the name or namespace after encrypting without enabling those in the encryption mode. More likely the first.

So, I don't think the documentation around deploying in Kubernetes from Helm is really that clear but I was basically missing a ui = true flag from the HCL config stanza. It's to be noted that this is in addition to the value passed to the helm chart:

The best way (and maybe the only way in Flutter) to do so is by playing with columns, rows and containers.

Based on the example you shared, I would go with :

I think on your case you need to create a support ticket on GCP Support, because is a very specific issue within you GCP-GKE-Hashicorp-Vault. Are you following some guide? I found the Hashicorp documentation, or you are following another guide which could provide more context?

There's no way to provide secret config information to chaincode at install time so unless you include the certificate in the chaincode package, which is probably a bad idea, so I think your chaincode will need an init transaction to send in the required certificate using transient data.

The chaincode lifecycle documentation describes how to require an init transaction.

If you are using the Fabric peer CLI, you can use the --init-required flag when you approve and commit the chaincode definition to indicate that the Init function must be called to initialize the new chaincode version. To call Init using the Fabric peer CLI, use the peer chaincode invoke command and pass the --isInit flag.

The private data describes how you can protect the TLS certificate when you initialise the chaincode.

Alternatively, if you don't want to use an init transaction or store the TLS certificate on the ledger/in a private data collection, you could provide the TLS certificate using transient data to every transaction which needs to communicate with the vault and leave it to the client to manage the certificate.