simple-state-machine | golang state machine

by markdaws Go Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | simple-state-machine Summary

simple-state-machine is a Go library typically used in User Interface applications. simple-state-machine has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

golang state machine

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

simple-state-machine has a low active ecosystem.

It has 5 star(s) with 6 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 1 open issues and 0 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of simple-state-machine is current.

Quality

simple-state-machine has no bugs reported.

Security

simple-state-machine has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

simple-state-machine is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

simple-state-machine releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of simple-state-machine

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

simple-state-machine Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for simple-state-machine.

simple-state-machine Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for simple-state-machine.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on simple-state-machine

External input to Python program during runtime

boost MPL::vector not recognized and Meta State Machine (MSM) transition table not defined

QUESTION

External input to Python program during runtime

Asked 2018-Jul-30 at 19:26

I am creating a test automation which uses an application without any interfaces. However, The application calls a batch script when it changes modes, and I am therefore am able to catch the mode transitions.

What I want to do is to get the batch script to give an input to my python script (I have a state machine running in python) during runtime. Such that I can monitor the state of the application with python instead of the batch file.

I am using a similar state machine to the one of Karn Saheb: https://dev.to/karn/building-a-simple-state-machine-in-python

However, instead of changing states statically like:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Jul-30 at 19:26

A reasonably portable way of doing this without ugly polling on temporary files is to use a socket: have the main process listen and have the batch file(s) start a small program that connects to the server and writes a message.

There are security considerations here: you can start by listening only to the loopback interface, with further authentication if the local machine should not be trusted.

If you have more than one of these processes, or if you need to handle the child dying before it issues its next report, you’ll have to use threads or something like select to unify the news from different input channels (e.g., waiting on the child to exit vs. waiting on news from the next batch file).

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51590422

QUESTION

boost MPL::vector not recognized and Meta State Machine (MSM) transition table not defined

Asked 2018-Apr-08 at 19:19

I'm trying to learn boost's meta state machine (MSM) library.

Following the simple state machine example in http://redboltz.wikidot.com/simple-state-machine, I face some problems:

I have a problem in defining the state machine's "transition table" using boost::mpl::vector.
...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Apr-08 at 19:19

what is the problem?
that's okay. The completion engine is probably misconfigured or using an old standard - meaning it doesn't understand all the boost headers.

mpl::vector is literally just a type-list, so there's no "intellisense" to expect at all: You can only give it types, and there is no way for the compiler to predict what types you wanted.

mpl::vector is equally valid as mpl::vector<>.
the things that's important is that your compiler understands it. So, apparently it does.

If you have a runtime error, find out information about the crash. The code from the link
- works fine with Boost 1.60 on MSVC http://rextester.com/OYVFX99145,
- with GCC on Boost 1.66 http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/6c11ec88771f0a33
- with Clang on Boost 1.66 http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/a78535220afc640d
See ^
Yeah, otherwise it wouldn't have compiled

Q1

It does recognize boost::mpl::vector or it wouldn't have compiled. See 2.

Q2

There's no difference: Both model the exact same type sequence. One is variadic, and the other "number" (i.e. having fixed length): https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_66_0/libs/mpl/doc/refmanual/vector.html

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49716116

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install simple-state-machine

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: