pairing | godoc https : //godoc.org/github.com/mnhkahn/pairing

I have a Json object which i get from a API, so i can not change it and need to work with it like it is. I see it have a lot of backlashes but if i put the json string into a json validator i get the info its vallid.

if i use the json object in javascript i also can read it until the last part where i get a error, when you take my json string and you do the following steps, you will see no error message:

I want to convert an object into an array of Key/Value pairings. For instance:

I'm trying to match job candidates to mentors based on different several variables that would hopefully create a good match. There are two Pandas DataFrames (one for candidates and one for mentors) that I'm trying to connect based on experience, location, desired job, etc.

For example I have a mentor DataFrame that might look something like the below:

I have a repetitive sanity-check process I go through with most calls to a BeautifulSoup object where I:

1. Make the function call (.find, .find_all, .select_one, and .select mostly)
2. Check to make sure the element(s) were found
   • If not found, I raise a custom MissingHTMLTagError, stopping the process there.
3. Attempt to retrieve attribute(s) from the element(s) (using .get or getattr)
   • If not found, I raise a custom MissingHTMLAttributeError
4. Return either a:
   • string, when it's a single attribute of a single element (.find and .select_one)
   • list of strings, when it's a single attribute of multiple elements (.find_all and .select)
   • dict, when it's two attributes (key/value pairs) for multiple elements (.find_all and .select)

I've created the below solution that acts as a proxy (not-so-elegantly) to BeautifulSoup methods. But, I'm hoping there is an easier eay to accomplish this. Basically, I want to be able to patch all the BeautifulSoup methods to:

1. Allow for an extra parameter to be passed, so that the above steps are taken care off in a single call
2. If using any of the above methods without providing the extra parameter I want to return the BeautifulSoup objects like normal or raise the MissingHTMLTagError if the return value is None or an empty list.

Most of the time the below function is used with a class variable (self._soup), which is just a BeautifulSoup object of the most-recent requests.Response.

I have developed an application on an on-board device which allows a smartphone to be able to connect in secure BLE.

Everything works fine but I notice that every time I do a "pairing" via an Android smartphone, that the smartphone "bonds" the device even though I specified in the request that I did not want bondage. I don't have this problem on IOS.

Here are the requests that are sent by my on-board device to the smartphone:

• Security request
• Pairing response

Is it possible that Android does not support "pairing only"? If it is paired, it does a "boding" automatically even if it has received a request asking it not to do a bond?

Thank you

I have a set of pairs of record IDs and for each pair a corresponding probability that these records actually belong to each other. Each pair is unique, but any given ID may be part of more than one pairing.

E.g.:

I am new to Pandas (but not to data science and Python). This question is not anly about how to solve this specific problem but how to handle problems like this the panda-way.

Please feel free to improve the title of that question. Because I am not sure what are the correct terms here.

Here is my MWE

I have a table of events like this

I am currently working on a C#-UWP app that needs to be able to discovery bluetooth devices (Not BLE) on the network and ones that have been previously connected to/paired.

Im sure anyone who is new to this task will have quickly found the documentation and example are of little help. I have learned more from Stackoverflow questions about peoples experimentations than from the docs and examples, but anyways.

My main question/problem is this: After setting up the device watcher to find bluetooth devices I found that I consistently get multiple additions of the same device but having a different bluetooth address (this is a device that was previously paired but not live on the network). After much investigate and brainstorming, we discovered that each device id is actually a pairing of the devices MAC address and the BT receivers MAC address.

The reason I was getting 3 device additions per 1 physical device is because I have connected to that same device with 3 different BT receiver dongles in the past. So my question is, is there anyway to make the device watcher return the device that corresponds to the currently active BT receiver dongle?

Otherwise I will need to find the currently active BT receivers MAC address and filter out the devices that do not have this, because otherwise the user will see 3 identical devices to select and only 1 of them will pass while the other 2 will fail.

While on this subject I would also like to mention that the device properties dont seem to be working. Before creating the watcher, I have a list of properties like this for example: