fcompare | Simple file comparison written in go
kandi X-RAY | fcompare Summary
kandi X-RAY | fcompare Summary
This is a quick way for locating identical files in a folder. Pass to the program the folder you want to check.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Checks for all files in the directory
- getHashForFile returns the MD5 hash of a file
- Print all identical files
- Checks if the program is running
- check panics
fcompare Key Features
fcompare Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on fcompare
QUESTION
The following c++
program gives a numerically different result when compiled with -O0
or -O1
.
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-25 at 20:51With -O1
, the floating computation happens at compile time, using the GNU MPFR library. MPFR is expected to give a correctly rounded result even for functions such as sin
and cos
. Your math library likely has different accuracy goals for these functions, which is why run-time computation (at the -O0
optimization level) sometimes gives different results. For example, the GNU C library has a general accuracy goal of a few ulp.
Reportedly, IEEE 754 only has accuracy requirements for a subset of the math library functions (sqrt
, apparently), which enables math libraries to choose different trade-offs between speed and accuracy for the transcendental functions. (I do not have access to IEEE 754 because IEEE is opposed to the open dissemination of knowledge unfortunately.)
QUESTION
I'm using the 'extend' function in simr, but I want to be able to confirm that it has appropriately extended the data set as I wanted it to. Is there a function I can use to show me the data set it has created?
I have a dataset including 17 participants in each of 2 groups. Each participant provided two ratings at each of 8 time points, so that I now have variables of participant (id), the difference between the two ratings (my dependent variable, rating_diff), time (8 levels) and group (2 levels, neutral and threat). As I understand it, id is nested within group.
I constructed the following model and calculated the power to detect an interaction between time and group:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-23 at 01:37You should be able to check with:
QUESTION
I want to create a generic record with some functionality, including a search function. To perform this search I wanted to pass a custom Comparer to compare items. If it were a class, I could pass it in the constructor, but I want to use a record to avoid to create or free it. So, I don't have a constructor where to initialize the Comparer.
Then I decided to pass the Comparer class like a Type parameter, and when I need the comparer, create a instance of the comparer using TComparer.Default.
Well, here is the code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-29 at 08:32The problem is the syntax of your constraint:
QUESTION
I want to estimate my required study sample size based on simulation using pilot data. My model looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-08 at 22:34I suspect you're going to underestimate your required sample size.
The test you're proposing asks "are all of these effects, taken together, significant?". But if you want to know if a specific effect is significant, you're asking a little more from your data and so you'll probably need a larger sample size.
Your sample size will usually be determined by your "hardest" question, so I would recommend running a separate power curve for each effect.
If you're having trouble with the simulation time, it's probably okay to use 'kr'
rather than 'pb'
. The analysis is already an approximation (since we never know the 'true' values of the parameters we use for our simulations). If you're worried the two tests might give different results, you could double check your proposed sample size with 'pb'
in a single run of powerSim
.
QUESTION
I know the title is a bit confusing. Let me clarify my problem with a little background:
My program behaves strangely when I compile it with -O1
flag vs -O0
flag in terms of execution time. I know -O1
flag does many optimizations such as fauto-inc-dec -fbranch-count-reg -fcombine-stack-adjustments
(More than 40 according to the man page). To figure out which optimization(s) cause this behavior, I plan to remove flags one at a time then compile and test to see if something changes.
Before doing this experiment, I want to make sure that the program compiled with -O1
and the program compiled with -O0
plus all flags which -O1
enables (Lets call -O0+
) behave similarly. Actually, I expect both method should produce the same binary file since the same optimization flags are enabled.
Compilation with O1
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-06 at 19:31The optimizations flags applied by -O1
only apply when the optimizer is turned on. You need to specify -On
with n > 0
in order for the optimization flags to actually do anything.
To put it another way, -O0
doesn't turn on the optimizer, so the optimization flags don't do anything.
You can turn off optimzations flags by using the -fno
form of the flag. For instance the
QUESTION
I have a dictionary crash in the DataSnap client because its FComparer is somehow nil.
Server side code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Apr-03 at 18:08The answer to "What is Delphi doing wrong" is:
DataSnap uses a TJsonMarshal
and TJsonUnmarshal
from the unit Data.DBXJSONReflect
. Upon unmarshalling, an instance of a TDictionary
is created by calling the parameterless constructor. The parameterless constructor here is the one inherited straight from TObject
.
When you, however, type TDictionary.Create();
you're calling the "correct" constructor with a default parameter (Create(ACapacity: Integer = 0);
). The TJsonUnmarshall
class, however, does not since it is looking for a constructor with really no parameters. The one you're usually calling has a parameter, even if you don't have to pass it.
I don't know how DataSnap works, but you should probably be able to pass a custom marshal and unmarshaller to whatever does the serialization.
Since Embarcadero closed all the bug reports I know of (example) as "Works as expected", it's probably a safe bet that generic collections should not be marshalled back and forth and you should probably revert to arrays.
Here is the minimal code to reproduce:
QUESTION
I am trying to sort my 2D array according to column 3. when I sort it with sort function, all the array members become duplicates of one member of the original array.
so for example;
my original array:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-01 at 07:14All you need to change is to return the sorted array.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install fcompare
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page