gowork | control goroutine

by qianlnk Go Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | gowork Summary

gowork is a Go library. gowork has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

gowork is a package for control goroutine's number.You must compile func worker by your self, the func type is:. you can transfer param by request, of course, if you have more params you may packaging them as a struct.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

gowork has a low active ecosystem.

It has 26 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

gowork has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of gowork is current.

Quality

gowork has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

gowork has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

gowork code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

gowork does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

gowork releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

It has 236 lines of code, 22 functions and 3 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed gowork and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into gowork implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

SetExecptionHandler sets an exception handler for a given job .
NewWorkManager returns a new WorkManager .
Default exception handler

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

gowork Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for gowork.

gowork Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for gowork.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on gowork

Running 60+ Remote Ubuntu From Unity / C#

How to Check if the Elements appear in the while loop

golang alpine docker Cross compile C++

Enormous amount of memory usage, no memory leak detected

QUESTION

Running 60+ Remote Ubuntu From Unity / C#

Asked 2021-Jan-28 at 07:03

I'm trying to running 60+ Ubuntu machine connected by 10Gbps ethernet in Unity with 28 cores.

So I made a task using SSH.NET like this. (Each Ubuntu cmd takes 5+ min)

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-28 at 07:03

A2.

Normally using SSH.NET, when client disconnected before its command has finished, It also stopped.

~~But I found "nohub" command allows commands keep running after disconnection.~~

Edit : No, whatever command alone couldn't solve this issue. I solved this eventually by shell class on SSH.NET

So I can reduce number of concurrent connection and FPS of Unity App has recovered.

Checking whether command has finished is other issue. It seems best options is parsing and handle with PID, but I'm using kind of shortcut for now.

A1.

I redesigned entire code and UbuntuWorker(alias) class has seperated to Ubuntu class and Worker class. So I can reduce number of task and I'm still finding optimized number for main machine.

Changed code is like this. (not exact code but simplified)

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65830238

QUESTION

How to Check if the Elements appear in the while loop

Asked 2021-Jan-10 at 19:58

I'm using puppeteer to crawl data, the site has some stricky tricks to hide the data so I have to do a while loop (click 2 buttons continuous until the data appears in DOM, and actual visible).

But I got trouble here, I can't check if the data is appeare and stop the loop.

This is the code:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-10 at 19:58

There are lots of easier of ways doing this but that is not your question. To be able to say where is the problem in your code we need to see the webpage source code. So without it i am going to make a guess.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65655434

QUESTION

golang alpine docker Cross compile C++

Asked 2020-Aug-12 at 16:31

I have a golang project that relies on C for invocation and compilation. Now, I used the make all command to build in the docker image of golang:alpine and found the following error：

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Aug-12 at 16:31

Compiling shared libraries is broken with -no-pie, which should be a noop in this case.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63380091

QUESTION

Enormous amount of memory usage, no memory leak detected

Asked 2020-Apr-28 at 16:20

I have a problem finding a memory leak in my program.

top reports an increasing memory usage as program runs. When profiling my program with valgrind, no memory leaks are reported.

Program consists in a "reader" thread and several "consumer" threads.

"reader" thread loads data into one of several char** pointers, one for every "consumer" thread.

"consumer" thread works on the data of its corresponding char* pointer and frees memory.

I have included some pseudocode that describes what my program is doing. I know the code provided might not be enough to describe the problem. I am happy to include the entire code project if that will help.

"reader" thread, condensed for brevity

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Apr-28 at 16:20

Turns out there is nothing wrong with my code per se.Calling free() after a malloc() releases memory on the heap to be reused by the program but that does not mean it goes back to the system. The reason for this is still a bit out of my understanding.

Valgrind was not reporting memory leaks because there are none.

After doing dome research, reading more about the nature of dynamic memory allocation and landing here:

Force free() to return malloc memory back to OS

Why does the free() function not return memory to the operating system?

Will malloc implementations return free-ed memory back to the system?

Memory not freed after calling free()

Calling malloc_trim() after each free was enough to make the system reclaim the allocated memory.

For example, without calling malloc_trim(), CPU and memory usage of my program looks like this: On each call to my "reader" thread (first peak in CPU ussage) some memory is allocated. Calling mu "consumer" threads free the requested memory but the memory is not always returned to the system as per the blue line in the plot.

With malloc_trim() after each free(), memory usage looks how I was expecting it to look: When "reader" thread is executing memory associated with the porcess increases. When "consumers" are running, memory is freed and returned to the OS.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61370334

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install gowork

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: