deadcode | Standalone repo of deadcode package
kandi X-RAY | deadcode Summary
kandi X-RAY | deadcode Summary
Standalone repo of deadcode package from http://github.com/remyoudompheng/go-misc
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- doPackage builds a package from the given file .
- doDir walks the directory recursively
- Main entry point
- Visit implements ast . Visitor
- errorf is used to print to os . Stderr
deadcode Key Features
deadcode Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on deadcode
QUESTION
I tried to find the sum of any array by using the for loop but the i++ part ended up being the deadcode unreachable. I don't understand why?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-10 at 11:41Don't return something inside for loop, because return ends the cycle of whole function.
Instead, do something like this:
QUESTION
I create a .golangci.yml
in working directory, which have more linters
than default, and run golangci-lint run -v
but found linters are still default value, anyone encountered same issue? I have checked .golangci.yml
path is correct. below is our configure value:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-30 at 11:42This yaml file isn't indented properly. try:
QUESTION
Does GCC, or do compilers in general, remove variables which are operated on, yet do not at all affect the result of the code? For example, say main only contained
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-16 at 22:24Yes, absolutely. This is a very common optimization.
The best way to answer such questions for yourself is to learn a little bit of assembly language and read the code generated by the compiler. In this case, you can see that not only does GCC optimize b
entirely out of existence, but also a
, and it compiles the whole function into just the equivalent of printf("%d", 100);
.
QUESTION
With golangci-lint
I know I can use skip-dirs
or skip-files
settings but these just stop reporting at the end and I think the tool still does the "work", quoting docs :
... which files to skip: they will be analyzed, but issues from them won't be reported. ...
Is there way, say with a variant of //nolint
to prevent some files getting analysed by golangci-lint
in the first place so we don't waste build-time resources - memory/cpu - on them them ?
I also tried lines at the top like // Code generated by XXX. DO NOT EDIT.
and these like //nolint
stop reporting but I think golangci-lint
is still doing the analysis - i.e. tool runs slow with high memory when big "ignored" files are present. From https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint#nolint I can do
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-22 at 19:36Using a new build tag to exclude files for golangci-lint
actually reduces its memory consumption (by preventing parsing of the files)
Example below is based on : https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/syzkaller/+/01d1494471798d6b91af9813d1d6c3e13a55536c
Go files which will now be "efficiently" skipped
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install deadcode
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page