strongbox | Encryption for Git users | Encryption library
kandi X-RAY | strongbox Summary
kandi X-RAY | strongbox Summary
Encryption for git users. Strongbox makes it easy to encrypt and decrypt files stored in git, with minimal divergence from a typical git workflow. Once installed, strongbox enables normal use of commands such as git diff etc. and all of the files that should be encrypted in the repository remain decrypted on your working copy. It supports use of different keys per directory if wanted. It can cover as many or as few files as you wish based on .gitattributes.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- main entry point
- smudge decrypts a key file and writes it to w
- clean reads the file from r and writes it to w .
- decryptCLI decrypts and decrypts and decrypts and decrypts it
- genKey generates a new key
- encrypt encrypts b with the given key .
- deriveHome returns the user s home directory .
- key retrieves a key from disk
- decrypt decrypts and returns the encrypted data .
- findKey finds a key in a file
strongbox Key Features
strongbox Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 3License : Weak Copyleft (LGPL-3.0)
Copygit show :/path/to/file
git show HEAD:/path/to/file
git diff-index -p master
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on strongbox
QUESTION
I am currently trying to write an App for my thesis and currently, I am looking into different approaches. Since I really like Flutter and the Thesis requires me to use Java/Kotlin I would like to use Jetpack compose.
Currently, I am stuck trying to update ListElements.
I want to have a List that shows Experiments and their state/result. Once I hit the Button I want the experiments to run and after they are done update their state. Currently, the run Method does nothing besides setting the state to success. The problem is I don't know how to trigger a recompose from the viewModel of the ExperimentRow once an experiment updates its state.
ExperimentsActivity:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-23 at 11:34There's a few ways to address this but key thing is that you need to add a copy of element (with state changed) to experiments to trigger the recomposition.
One possible example would be
QUESTION
In .NET Framework, SynchronizationContext is one of the contexts flown by ExecutionContext. Is this no longer true in .NET Core?
The long questionIn Stephen Toub's blog post ExecutionContext vs SynchronizationContext from 2012, he writes about how SynchronizationContext is a part of ExecutionContext:
Isn’t SynchronizationContext part of ExecutionContext?
I’ve glossed over some details up until this point, but I can’t avoid them any further.
The main thing I glossed over is that of all the contexts ExecutionContext is capable of flowing (e.g. SecurityContext, HostExecutionContext, CallContext, etc.), SynchronizationContext is actually one of them. This is, I personally believe, a mistake in API design, one that’s caused a few problems since it was instituted in .NET many versions ago. Nevertheless, it’s the design we have and have had for a long time, and changing it now would be a breaking change.
The blog post goes on to elaborate on when the SynchronizationContext is being flown as part of ExecutionContext, and when that flowing is being suppressed:
The story now gets a bit messier: ExecutionContext actually has two Capture methods, but only one of them is public. The internal one (internal to mscorlib) is the one used by most asynchronous functionality exposed from mscorlib, and it optionally allows the caller to suppress the capturing of SynchronizationContext as part of ExecutionContext; corresponding to that, there’s also an internal overload of the Run method that supports ignoring a SynchronizationContext that’s stored in the ExecutionContext, in effect pretending one wasn’t captured (this is, again, the overload used by most functionality in mscorlib). What this means is that pretty much any asynchronous operation whose core implementation resides in mscorlib won’t flow SynchronizationContext as part of ExecutionContext, but any asynchronous operation whose core implementation resides anywhere else will flow SynchronizationContext as part of ExecutionContext.
However, Stephen Toub clearly talks about .NET Framework here, and reading through some of the source code for how ExecutionContext is implemented in .NET Core, it seems that this might have changed in .NET Core. The boolean preserveSyncCtx argument that was part of the internal .NET Framework ExecutionContext methods are nowhere to be found in the more modern .NET Core implementations.
But the Microsoft documentation for ExecutionContext is the same for .NET Framework and .NET Core, and states
The ExecutionContext class provides a single container for all information relevant to a logical thread of execution. This includes security context, call context, and synchronization context.
and
Wherever the compressed stack flows, the managed principal, synchronization, locale, and user context also flow.
which seems to indicate that SynchronizationContext should still be part of ExecutionContext.
To try and figure out if there is a difference, I wrote the following NUnit test:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-12 at 10:15It looks like in .NET Core, at least in the current version 3.1, ExecutionContext doesn't capture SynchronizationContext anymore. See it here in the ExecutionContext source code. Still, if the synchronization context have changed inside the ExecutionContext.Run callback, it will be restored.
I think it makes sense, given that with.NET Core, SynchronizationContext is only really relevant in the front-end code. They aim to optimize the server-side code as much as possible, so they removed that piece.
QUESTION
I'm trying to generate test coverage report and view on teamcity after my project build is complete. So far I have been able to make it work on my local machine (windows) without any issue. The report is generating and I am able to view the coverage reports (html files generated) but it is failing on teamcity (project building with linux agent) with the error below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-13 at 20:37Try using the dotnet tool package instead:
QUESTION
my on-prem, Azure DevOps 2019's backups are showing an unsubstainable increase in size of the .mdf file
- query1 shows that it's the "dbo.tbl_content" table
- query2 shows that it's "FileContainer" at 112GB.
- query3 shows that it's pipelines://b at 93GB.
- query4 shows that the size used has gone up from 1GB a month, to the unsubstainable 10GB per month. This occurred in Jan 2020, when possibly coincidentally, we upgraded from TFS18 to AzureDevOps19.
So,I believe I'm looking for a build pipe (not release pipe) that needs cleaning up? Historically, we've tried to keep 366 days worth of old build logs but at the rate we're going we won't make it.
we've got about 40 build pipes (some historic, that no longer run), inc 4 triggered on commit (CI).
re: retention policy...
- typical CI build retention policy. Days to keep: 10 Min to Keep: 1
- typical RC build retention policy. Days to keep: 180 Min to Keep: 50
- from: DefaultCollection/Base/_settings/buildqueue... Maximum retention policy / Days to keep: 183 Min to Keep: 55 Default retention policy / Days to keep: 15 Min to Keep: 1 Permanently destroy builds / Days to keep build record after deletion: 366 <- I reduced this yesterday down from 7000
Any help appreciated here, but specifically:
- How can I track down the specific build that's causing the problem? and how can I fix it?
- Is there any tooling that will show me where problems lie. e.g. TFS used to have a health audit tool, but I can't see it?
Thanks,
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-29 at 08:47You could try to run below query to narrow down the date:
QUESTION
I am a university student, looking to do some OSS work in order to practice in Software Engineering. I would like to ask what are the hardware requirements for building and developing Strongbox, as I couldn't find any information in the documentation.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-11 at 14:45Thank you for your interested in our project! We should indeed add pages to our documentation regarding both the required runtime and development hardware resources.
I would recommend the following, if you'd like to be able to build things in reasonably short times:
At least 16 GB RAM
An Intel i7 processor (or equivalent)
An SSD
Of course, you can get by with less than that, but your build times with all unit and integrations tests would be significantly higher. A typical build with all unit + integrations tests (executed with mvn clean install -Dintegration.tests) should take between 8-16 minutes depending on your hardware.
Of course, you can work only on the modules you're interested in, but, in the end you will still have to build the entire project along with all tests.
For more details, please feel free to join our chat channel.
QUESTION
Is ASN.1 definition provided by google on https://developer.android.com/training/articles/security-key-attestation#attestation-v3 valid one?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-22 at 00:07The corrections you made are necessary. The first ASN.1 specification above contains all the errors that you listed.
QUESTION
I'm in a corporate environment where an artifact repository manager is, unfortunately, still an utopian concept and is currently not possible to on-board to for many projects. This being said, you can probably imagine the amount complexity involved in on-boarding external artifacts. (I'm very familiar with artifact repository managers and how to use them and I'm even the project owner of an OSS one, so need to give me the lecture on archiva, artifactory, sonatype-nexus, strongbox and the likes. I get it, but it's not up to me).
Could somebody please tell me what the exact (Maven) artifact coordinates and/or URL are for the Gradle JaCoCo plugin, so that it could be manually downloaded and approved internally?
The Gradle documentation only defines it as:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-15 at 18:31It's bundled with gradle. So it doesn't have any GAV, because it doesn't exist as a standalone plugin. You won't find it in the Maven repository, because it's part of gradle itself.
Here's its documentation for gradle 4.2: https://docs.gradle.org/4.2/userguide/jacoco_plugin.html and for gradle 4.10: https://docs.gradle.org/4.10/userguide/jacoco_plugin.html.
You should really upgrade. 4.2 and 4.10 are quite old versions.
QUESTION
I am trying to contribute to strongbox repository.
When trying to run mvn clean install i'm receiving the following error: anyone had this error when building the project?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-14 at 20:21I started from: https://strongbox.github.io/developer-guide/building-the-code.html Instead of: https://strongbox.github.io/developer-guide/getting-started.html when I added settings.xml everything was fixed.
QUESTION
I was wondering where I could find the REST API documentation for Strongbox and if at all it has one? Could somebody please tell me where to find this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-07 at 17:51There are currently two ways to get the REST API documentation for Strongbox:
Get the strongbox-distribution and start it locally.
Clone the Strongbox project, (if you're interested in developing new functionality for Strongbox) and build it (by following the build instructions here) and start it locally.
You can then navigate to http://localhost:48080/docs/rest/api.html (as explained here in our wiki).
Disclaimer: I am the project owner of Strongbox.
QUESTION
I need the list of Android phones that support secure element and StrongBox in Android 9. Where or how can I find that?
I tried the code below with Samsung Galaxy S9 and also with AVD Google Pixle XL API 28
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-10 at 08:55Currently very few devices support StrongBox, and unfortunately the information you can find online is scarce at best.
While you are right, that according to Android devices running Android 9.0 should support Strongbox, Strongbox is a separate hardware component, and I would assume only devices launching with Android 9.0 have the chance of having the hardware.
There is the GrapheneOS/AttestationSamples repository, which collects security information about multiple devices.
Taking a look, only Google's Pixel 3 devices support strongbox. You can see the Strongbox attestation certificates in the folders.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install strongbox
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
