exploit-exercises | Mirror for exploit-exercises.com

 by   FFY00 HTML Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | exploit-exercises Summary

kandi X-RAY | exploit-exercises Summary

exploit-exercises is a HTML library. exploit-exercises has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Mirror for exploit-exercises.com
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              exploit-exercises has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 13 star(s) with 6 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 0 open issues and 1 have been closed. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of exploit-exercises is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              exploit-exercises has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              exploit-exercises has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              exploit-exercises does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              exploit-exercises releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of exploit-exercises
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            exploit-exercises Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for exploit-exercises.

            exploit-exercises Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for exploit-exercises.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Protostar Stack6 - Segfault for no reason?
            Asked 2020-Aug-26 at 07:39

            So I am doing the protostar challenges from exploit exercises and I'm completely stumped. Protostar runs on a virtual machine emulating an i686 processor.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-26 at 07:39

            When piping or routing input into the program then stdin basically ceases to exist when the providing source is at the end of it's output or terminates. Therefore you don't get a shell.

            Disassemble main didn't work anymore at the instances with that behavior because the program being loaded by gdb no longer is stack6 but /bin/sh. Executing Run again would execute /bin/sh.

            I have no idea why the program segfaulted when the piped input ran out. But with the file the interrupt 80 did not segfault and afterwards it ran interrupt 80 with eax = 1 calling exit(ebx), leading to normal termination.

            To execute the exploit, you need shell code that doesn't need stdin input, such as a metasploit reverse tcp bind shell or you need to provide continuous input after the exploit was executed. For example like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63580576

            QUESTION

            Protostar, linux Could not resolve 'ftp.au.debian.org'
            Asked 2020-Apr-14 at 09:04

            I want to do the Protostar exploit exercises in https://exploit-exercises.lains.space/

            I wanted to install the Python 3 version and to do that I need to run the sudo apt-get update command. But it seems like it fails and the problem is with the dns. But unfortunately I can't fix it.

            This is the output when I run the command.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Apr-14 at 09:04

            So to solve and download python 3.6 on Protostar :

            ( apparently there was no internet connection on the host because of the Host-only adapter in virtualbox )

            downloaded python using wget :

            wget https://www.python.org/ftp/python/3.6.9/Python-3.6.9.tgz

            Then I transferred it using scp ( ssh ) ( you can move it to /tmp and then to /usr/sbin if it says no permission )

            scp Python-3.6.9.tgz root@192.168.56.102:/usr/sbin

            exported and install python

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61159489

            QUESTION

            Overflowed bytes different than those I see on GDB?
            Asked 2020-Mar-30 at 00:13

            I am trying to do the ProtoStar stack5 challenge. I know the solution (following a write up), but I am trying to come up with a different approach.

            Here is the source code for the program we are trying to execute shellcode on:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Mar-30 at 00:13

            So I ended up posting this issue on LiveOverflow's subreddit and I was pointed towards the direction of this video by LiveOverflow.

            The video will explain it much better than me, but essentially, python2 and python3 do not print hex into ascii the same. Python3 inserts extra characters, while python2 prints the raw hex string.

            I strongly encourage you to watch the video as it explains it indepth.

            This answer from another question here on SO answered by @dsh also explains it:

            The byte-sequence C3 BE is the UTF-8 encoded representation of the character U+00FE.

            Python 2 handles strings as a sequence of bytes rather than characters. So '\xfe' is a str object containing one byte.

            In Python 3, strings are sequences of (Unicode) characters. So the code '\xfe' is a string containing one character. When you print the string, it must be encoded to bytes. Since your environment chose a default encoding of UTF-8, it was encoded accordingly.

            How to solve this depends on your data. Is it bytes or characters? If bytes, then change the code to tell the interpreter: print(b'\xfe'). If it is characters, but you wanted a different encoding then encode the string accordingly: print( '\xfe'.encode('latin1') ).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60660568

            QUESTION

            Bufferoverflow - assembly changes after pushing string to stack
            Asked 2020-Jan-19 at 12:01

            Hey I´m currently doing ProtoStar-Stack5 http://exploit-exercises.lains.space/protostar/stack5/ with following c-code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jan-19 at 12:01

            You are executing code from the stack, and then pushing new values to the stack - that why the push is in fact overwriting your shellcode.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59809803

            QUESTION

            Why is the result of chr(0x24) + chr(0x84) different in python 2 and 3
            Asked 2018-Feb-12 at 20:27

            I was using python to solve the protostar challenges from exploit-exercises. And I was surprised by the different output for this code with python 3.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Feb-12 at 20:27

            QUESTION

            Shellcode not executed properly
            Asked 2017-Apr-01 at 15:12

            I am trying to solve Protostar stack5. Here is a solution. It puts the shellcode after the return address, I tried to put it before, in the array. I have tried the shellcode, it works.

            It seems everything OK, the execution jumps to shellcode, but I get a segmentation fault after the end of shellcode, and no shell is spawned. I do not know why, in gdb not all shellcode instructions appear properly. For example at 0xbffff690 should be mov %esp,%ecx not cwtl. Maybe this is the problem? Why is this happening?

            Edit: Since the array address will be slightly different when it is started outside gdb we need a nop sled. So my approach maybe will not work because the array size is too small for this. However I still want to know why the end of the shellcode is interpreted wrongly in gdb.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Apr-01 at 15:12

            Interesting question. The answer is: you have a stack overflow in your stack overflow.

            On my system, the disassembly for main is at a slightly different address:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43141239

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install exploit-exercises

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/FFY00/exploit-exercises.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone FFY00/exploit-exercises

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:FFY00/exploit-exercises.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link