Q8 | Bytecode VM and Assembler in JS | Bytecode library

Try this:

There are two issues here: First, you merge your partial arrays into a temporary local array, which yoes out of bounds after you return from merge. The pointer you return points to invlid memory. That's what the warning about.

Second, you don't check whether you are reading beyond the limits of the partial arrays when you merge: The condition x < n must be true when you access fir, likewise for y < m and sec.

You are also causing confusion by returning a pointer to the first element of the sorted or merged arrays. That suggests that you create new sorted and merged arrays (and that's what you try to do in merge). This is okay for garbage-collected morern languages, but C doesn't work that way.

In C, if you need new memory, you must allocate it and later free it explicitly. In a recursive function like yours, this is tedious, because you are interested only in the final sorted array, not in the intermediate results. Therefore, C sorting algorithms usually work "in place": The same memory is used thoughout the sorting and elements are swapped. The original order of the elements is lost unless you make a copy before sorting.

For merge sort, you need auxiliary memory. In your case, you use the temporary arrays AL and AR, which are copies of the contents of the original array, A. Now when you merge, you can merge AL and AR back into A.

So istead of creating a ephemeral local array, pass in A so that it can be filled with the sorted elements:

Spreadsheets, including Google Sheets, store dates as numbers. Dates can be shown in many different formats to the user, but their value is still just an integer.

More info: here

Note: if you want to convert the date to text, you can try changing C8:C&" " to to_text(C8:C)&" " and see if that works?

You didn't show how you try to get random elements so you could do something what changes order back to original.

You can use random.shuffle(list) to set random order on the list.
And then you can use for item on list: ... to get items without repetition.

{A8:A1000&" "&B8:B1000, C8:C1000} is wide only two columns, therefore use:

This was caused due to the two while statements in my code. They basically called each other and froze the app.

Base R approach :

• Use apply in rowwise fashion to go through each row in combinationDf.
• Get the column names which has value as 1 in a row.
• Subset those columns in inputDf and select rows where all the values are 1.
• Combine the list of dataframes into one dataframe.

If I'm understanding your intention correctly, it looks like the only change you need to make is move prime1<-NULL just before the for-loop. In your version of the code, you were resetting the list of primes every time you found a new one. The fixed version (with spacing tidied up) is below.

display : flex on the parent div or display : inline-block on the child input elements will position elements next to each other