jumpstart | Easily jumpstart a new Rails application

Most programs do not stand on their own. They use routines, data, and definitions from other software. Such other software might be organized as part of an operating system, as a software library or framework or other packaging.

When a program is built, pieces of such other software are used in building it: It may use “header” files from the other software, incorporate routines from static libraries, link to routines in dynamic libraries, and use an executable file format required by the operating system. This is called “building against” the other software. I would, however, classify that as an informal term, not a technical definition of how the linking proceeds.

Adding an answer for completeness.

Devise's create action calls the build_resurce method that you are overriding. the problem is that you overrid it for the new action but didn't take into account the create action.

So, you are doing this:

Just 1 CSS function: width: fit-content Note here: It doesnt work in IE. Try it out:

See Spring Integration and the Spring Integration Extension for Apache Kafka.

Use inbound and outbound channel adapters

If Dockerfile is in your current directory, this command will build image and store it locally:

Well, I see now your point about round-robin. You create many similar TCP channel adapters against the same channels. In this case it is indeed hard to distinguish one flow from another because you have a little control over those channels and their subscribers.

On of the solution would be grate with Spring Integration Java DSL and its dynamic flows: https://docs.spring.io/spring-integration/reference/html/dsl.html#java-dsl-runtime-flows

So, you would concentrate only on the flows and won't worry about runtime registration. But since you are not there and you deal just with plain Java & Annotations configuration, it is much harder for you to achieve a goal. But still...

You may be know that there is something like replyChannel header. It is taken into an account when we don't have a outputChannel configured. This way you would be able to have an isolated channel for each flow and the configuration would be really the same for all the flows.

So,

• I would create a new channel for each configureAdapterCombination() call.
• Propagate this one into that method for replyChannel.subscribe(outboundAdapter);
• Use this channel in the beginning of your particular flow to populate it into a replyChannel header.

This way your processQuery() service-activator should go without an outputChannel. It is going to be selected from the replyChannel header for a proper outbound channel adapter correlation.

You don't need a @MessagingGateway for such a scenario since we don't have a fixed defaultRequestChannel any more. In the sendFirstResponse() service method you just take a replyChannel header and send a newly created message manually. Technically it is exactly the same what you try to do with a mentioned @MessagingGateway.

For Java DSL variant I would go with a filter on the PublishSubscribeChannel to discard those messages which don't belong to the current flow. Anyway it is a different story.

Try to figure out how you can have a reply channel per flow when you configure particular configureAdapterCombination().

As far as I know, webpacker is not going through the asset pipeline. If you have a Rails 5.x project, you can use the asset pipeline (check your Rails version in the gemfile) next to webpacker.

With the same boilerplate I made it work by following these steps:

• add to gemfile as you did and bundle install
• yarn add trix in the command line
• add @import "trix"; to app/assets/stylesheets/application.scss
• and then, because of the yarn install you can import it into the 'new' javascript folder app/javascript/packs/application.js like so: import 'trix'

With the same html code, the editor now shoes perfectly fine for me :)

I used a different approach, specific to ipython in here(https://stackoverflow.com/a/56216780/10834788).

Your error message suggests that peridot-php/peridot package v1.16 that you require only works with symfony/console in version ~2.0, which is equivalent to any 2.x version and thus incompatible with 3.x version of symfony/console which Laravel requires.

First version of peridot-php/peridot that supports symfony/console 3.x is 1.18.1, so you need to bump your dependency to that version to support Symfony Console 3.x properly.