es5 | Перевод стандарта ES5 | Script Programming library

I solved this issue https://github.com/wotamann/vuetify-form-base/issues/50 In the SSR mode form didn't render correctly!

Solution1:

You should use the 'v-mask' package and import the main component file in the vuetify-form-base package.

You should export this package in a plugin like as below: Vue.component('VueMask', () => import('v-mask'))

after that add the main file component to your project:

https://github.com/wotamann/vuetify-form-base/blob/master/dist/src/vFormBase.vue

Alternative solution:

• You can use the https://www.npmjs.com/package/vuetify-form-base-srr package.

*Edited

My mistake was thinking that the webpack ts-loader would take context from from ts-config file and transpile the typescript according to that and webpack the content into the final bundle. Upon looking at my question again ive realised i put the index.tsx file as my entry point which is why i was still getting a bundled webpack file but my imports were undefined the only file being webpack was my index file i believe. That combined with the single file output tsc seems to have been the cause.

tsc was creating a bundle of my typescript.

webpack was creating a bundle of just my index.tsx file

Problem entry: './src/index.tsx' & "outFile": "./dist/main.js"

Finally, It's been resolved, my Hello World is done.

These 2 replies from the maintainer himself (@necolas) on this discussion helped me to get the issue.

Reply 1 by @necolas This line in the stack trace is telling you that you're trying to bundle RN internal code in your web bundle: node_modules/react-native/Libraries/NewAppScreen/index.js.

First, you should not be loading any of the RN package on web, especially not parts that aren't part of the public API . Second, as mentioned in the inline comments of the config you pasted above, you need to explicitly list everything in node_modules that needs compiling.

Reply 2 by @necolas

(V8 developer here.)

Both the ECMAScript standard itself and engines' implementations of it evolve by adding individual features one by one.

The "TC39" committee discusses new proposed features. Once a feature has been agreed upon, it is added to the standard (see the "Process" document @Bergi linked in his comment for more details). The yearly "releases" of ECMAScript are just snapshots of this continuous process.

Engines typically implement a new feature either shortly before it is finalized (so that implementation feedback can inform the standardization discussion) or shortly after.

Rewriting an entire JavaScript engine from scratch every year would be a huge waste of effort: most of the language doesn't change. Also, rewriting an entire JavaScript engine from scratch would take many years. (In fact, rewriting any software from scratch is almost always a bad idea, because you'll spend a huge amount of time just catching up with what the old version was able to do. Incremental improvements are almost always the better strategy.)

The majority of engine developers' time is typically spent on improving support for existing features and subsystems (compilers, garbage collectors, internal object model, ...), such as making them faster or more memory efficient.

I share many of the same frustrations! It's so hard to get Typescript working nicely with Javascript and the microsoft documentation is so obtuse!

In your case : the path to a library is always looked for in node_modules so in that case you don't need to add the full path.

You also never need to import a .d.ts file. You can just put the .d.ts file somewhere in your working folder and VS Code will detect it.

If you have the .d.ts file for moment.js, you will get type completion in VS Code. You don't need to import moment.js when you load it with a

When using create-react-app, it is fine for my emotion theme types to go in:

Navigating within a Vaadin UI will change the URL in your browser, but it will not necessarily create a browser request to that exact URL, effectively bypassing the access control defined by Spring security for that URL. As such, Vaadin is really not suited for the request URL-based security approach that Spring provides. For this issue alone you could take a look at my add-on Spring Boot Security for Vaadin which I specifically created to close the gap between Spring security and Vaadin.

But while creating two distinct Spring security contexts based on the URL is fairly easy, this - for the same reason - will not work well or at all with Vaadin. And that's something even my add-on couldn't help with.

Update: As combining both security contexts is an option for you, I can offer the following solution (using my add-on): Starting from the Keycloak example, you would have to do the following:

1. Change WebSecurityConfig to also add your DB-based AuthenticationProvider. Adding your UserDetailsService should still be enough. Make sure to give every user a suitable role.
2. You have to remove this line from application.properties: codecamp.vaadin.security.standard-auth.enabled = false This will re-enable the standard login without Keycloak via a Vaadin view.
3. Adapt the KeycloakRouteAccessDeniedHandler to ignore all test views that shouldn't be protected by Keycloak.

I already prepared all this in Gitlab repo and removed everything not important for the main point of this solution. See the individual commits and their diffs to also help focus in on the important bits.

EDIT: updating the build command fixed OP's issue.

Do you even need the vercel.json here?
I've tried to host one of my repo there and it's working fine with those settings only.

Hosted there: https://nuxt-tailwind-typography-darkmode-boilerplate.vercel.app/

Vercel pretty much self-detected that it was a Nuxt project and almost aced it itself.

Laravel mix is a wrapper around webpack, so using gulp isn't configureable

Seeing as your setup isn't doing much, I would swap to using webpack