WPFConverters | project contains a set of generic binding converters
kandi X-RAY | WPFConverters Summary
kandi X-RAY | WPFConverters Summary
This project contains a set of generic binding converters that can be used in most any WPF (or Silverlight) application.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of WPFConverters
WPFConverters Key Features
WPFConverters Examples and Code Snippets
def find_optimal_binary_search_tree(nodes):
"""
This function calculates and prints the optimal binary search tree.
The dynamic programming algorithm below runs in O(n^2) time.
Implemented from CLRS (Introduction to Algorithms) book.
private void doGraphFrameAlgorithms(GraphFrame graph) {
graph.pageRank().maxIter(20).resetProbability(0.15).run().vertices().show();
graph.connectedComponents().run().show();
graph.triangleCount().run().show();
}
public Stream getAllAlgorithms() {
return RandomGeneratorFactory.all().map(RandomGeneratorFactory::name);
}
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on WPFConverters
QUESTION
I am looking for information on best practices when referencing C# projects in multiple solutions, in both debug and release modes. nuget and symbol servers (I use myget, and really like it) solves that for release packages.
But I'm confused about what to do when debugging. If I try to stick with the nuget approach, I have to a new debug version of subsidiary packages to myget as I find & fix problems, and then clear the nuget cache and rebuild the main project. That works, but it quickly gets tedious.
Is there a way to tag a nuget package so that it's marked as "for debug use only"?
Another idea I had was to use the capabilities of the new csproj file format in VS 2017, like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-12 at 16:42Because all of my projects are available within my development system's file system, I realized that it was unnecessary for me to publish packages for debug versions. Basically, I should just modify all the source code locally, and only publish release packages.
I was able to solve the "clutter" problem of having a lot of subsidiary projects referenced in a VS solution by creating a single solution folder, and adding all the necessary subsidiary projects to it.
Granted, this may complicate the life of anyone else trying to use my open source software -- they'd have to clone all the subsidiary packages as well as whatever primary one they're interested in -- but that's certainly doable.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install WPFConverters
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page