Clean_Code | Clean code and specification
kandi X-RAY | Clean_Code Summary
kandi X-RAY | Clean_Code Summary
Clean code and specification
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Clean_Code
Clean_Code Key Features
Clean_Code Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Clean_Code
QUESTION
this is a facsimile of the code I have at the moment
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-25 at 05:00Create a vector with column index that you want to replace in Clean_Code
. Note that you can use :
to create sequence of index if they are consecutive, if they are not add them manually. Create a similar vector for Code_test
. For Code_test
you can create a vector of column index or column names whichever is easy. Both of them should work.
QUESTION
It's always get None in clean() or clean_field(), but it's in self.data.
django 2.x
The fields declaration is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-17 at 08:41Firstly, you must always return the cleaned value from a field clean method. Secondly, it is not safe to access other field values in a field clean method; that is what the overall clean() method is for.
QUESTION
Is the way I write discount_code.first().is_active()
the right way, or is it preferable to work with .get
as (discount) code is a code unique field per event? Different events can have the code.
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-14 at 16:49You can save a query here. The return value of .first()
on the queryset has all the info you need for your validation:
QUESTION
I am experimenting with the Guideline Support Library.
This code works perfectly fine and valgrind is showing no memory problems
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-27 at 07:50Just guessing here, but it seems that when the object that gsl::finally
returns is destructed, it calls the lambda which free's the memory.
In the first case this returned object is assigned to the variable _
which is destructed once main
returns. In the second case the object is destructed immediately after the call to gsl::finally
, leading to any access to the memory afterwards being invalid.
QUESTION
I'm very very new to RxJava and I'm still trying to understand the data flow but I want to know if this is possible before heading to far down the rabbit hole.
The goal: to decouple API resources and allow them to be distributed, as well as providing flexibility to the clients (web/mobile) to fetch data based on the href links provided to only a few 'known' API endpoints.
I've got a collection of JSON objects from one API where each json has an 'href' field that provides a link to the API resource where the full details of the data can be retrieved. For example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jan-12 at 11:03flatMap
operator is the thing you are looking for. You can emit the href links in a stream so that in flatMap operator you convert each link into a new observable which propagates its result into the original stream. I think this is exactly the behavior you described.
EDIT:
Retrofit library provides nice interface to create observables from links. To elaborate more on your example, you first need to transform the collection object into some kind of Iterable using map
operator. Once you have an interable, use flatMap
to create an observable of items that belong to the Iterable using Observable.from()
. This will emit the links as separate emissions. You then use flatMap
again to transform each link into an observable of network request which forwards the emission back to the original stream.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Clean_Code
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page