websec | git repository contains W3C Web Security documents | Identity Management library

by w3c HTML Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(8)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | websec Summary

websec is a HTML library typically used in Security, Identity Management, Docker applications. websec has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This git repository contains W3C Web Security documents and draft charters.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

websec has a low active ecosystem.

It has 29 star(s) with 18 fork(s). There are 41 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 8 open issues and 81 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 15 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of websec is current.

Quality

websec has no bugs reported.

Security

websec has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

websec does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

websec releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of websec

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

websec Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for websec.

websec Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for websec.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on websec

Spring Security JDBC authentication login user error

Spring security Version 3.1 - Need to match user using either userPrincipalName without domain added OR sAMAccountName (search filter ?)

Is Chrome supposed to ignore the unsafe-inline directive if a hash is declared?

SSO authentication angular application with service gateway call

How to bypass function parameters in PHP?

AES Decryption throws ValueError: Input strings must be a multiple of 16 in length

PHP Mailer sends duplicates

Loop only checks one email

QUESTION

Spring Security JDBC authentication login user error

Asked 2020-Mar-26 at 20:56

I have problem with modifying code. I had Spring project with Columns email,password,active user. Now i wanted to make same but with out Activitation check. Changed Spring Security to :

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Mar-26 at 20:56

You need to change your user's query to read like this, making every user active (=1), effectively ignoring the activity check.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60866519

QUESTION

Spring security Version 3.1 - Need to match user using either userPrincipalName without domain added OR sAMAccountName (search filter ?)

Asked 2019-Oct-17 at 13:46

All,

Our IT dept has decided to change the suffix of our users in AD by adding a different suffix to the userPrincipalName in AD to the actual domain being used.

e.g. our domain is xxx.com but userPrincipalName is now "usera@zzz.tech" whereas before it was "usera@xxx.com".

The Spring LDAP AD authentication no longer works with this because of this reason I think: userPrincipalName is built up using name + domain when it tries to authenticate.

I need to override this somehow - but keep with Spring security version 3.1 (ideally !)

This is the security bean we use

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Oct-17 at 13:46

We ended up modifying the original Spring code for the class : ActiveDirectoryLdapAuthenticationProvider and changing the method createBindPrincipal to allow a userPrincipalName that has a different domain to the security root domain to be authorised.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58232159

QUESTION

Is Chrome supposed to ignore the unsafe-inline directive if a hash is declared?

Asked 2019-Sep-17 at 14:05

Given the following:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Sep-17 at 14:05

It's actually a nonce that will be used if present, not a hash.

Some further information can be found here:

https://csp.withgoogle.com/docs/strict-csp.html

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57960633

QUESTION

SSO authentication angular application with service gateway call

Asked 2019-Jul-24 at 12:39

We have an application which is built using Angular. And the application trigger backend REST api to display data.

The issue was,

The application use LDAP SSO authentication to validate user (It is an internal application within company so no outside users)

The steps are,

If user launch the site, It will redirect to WebSec login where user provides username and password for authentication (Implicit flow).
Once the successful authentication, we will JWT access token from WebSec which will be stored in session storage and that will be used as "Bearer" token for backend services.
The backend service has its WebSec certificate to validate this JWT token at their side if not it will respond with Authentication error.

For Front end - We are using Angular For back end - We are Java, Sprint boot.

Questions are,

Is this right way for User authentication?
If so, how safe is the Implicit flow. Ref: https://www.instagram.com/developer/authentication/ - Everyone is recommending Explicit flow (Server side call). Our UI app is maintained in different server and Backend services are maintained different server.

I would appreciate if anyone provide solution on this.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jul-24 at 11:28

The problem with implicit flow is that the JWT token is present in the URL. The implicit flow can be implemented in your Front-end or Back-end, both are not recommended but doing it in Front-end has more vulnerabilities, which is what you are trying to do, if I understood your question correctly.

I would implement it the following way.

Your Front-end will redirect to WebSec login
On successful login, WebSec will redirect to your Back-end
Back-end retrieves the JWT token
Back-end creates a one-time token and redirects to your Front-end with that one-time token
Front-end retrieves the one-time token and POST the token to the Back-end to retrieve the JWT token

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57105396

QUESTION

How to bypass function parameters in PHP?

Asked 2019-Feb-07 at 06:46

I am currently writing a python script that restores a Joomla website. Its actually based on the on the flaws posted here.

I suspect the PHP script that I am targeting isn't supposed to be called directly. When I run my script against it, it returns this,

{"status":false,"message":"Invalid login"}

And here is the function I suspect is responsible!

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Feb-07 at 05:37

I guess not always but if the Function parameters are fetched from http requests then its possible for example the following can be bypassed

Here the following clears $_REQUEST but it doesn't clear $_POST and $_GET therefore leaving a gap for bypass

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54552747

QUESTION

AES Decryption throws ValueError: Input strings must be a multiple of 16 in length

Asked 2018-Oct-19 at 09:03

I got this current code of Github(@Cahlen Humphreys) and initially it wasn't working but after minor changes it runs for encryption,

but decryption gives me the following error:
...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Oct-19 at 08:48

There are some security issues with your code:

Using a padded plaintext password directly as encryption key is insecure. Use a key derivation function like scrypt or PBKDF2 instead.
A fixed IV is essentially useless. Use random bytes as IV as store it together with the ciphertext.
It's good to use a MAC (e.g. HMAC or GCM) to be able to validate decrypted data.

Having said that, my guess for why it's not working is you're either running on Windows or have a non-latin default charset.

Try adding binary mode to open() calls:

open(cipher_name, 'w') → open(cipher_name, 'wb')
open(ciphername,'r') → open(ciphername,'rb')

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52887310

QUESTION

PHP Mailer sends duplicates

Asked 2017-Apr-28 at 08:41

I have a problem that my current php send duplicate emails using PHPMailer. The php file is to be run by a cronjob, but for we just run it manually.

I tried $mail->ClearAddresses(); but that didn't seem to help.

When we vardump $mail; but it looks like it is only sent once, and our "Message has been sent" message is only being printed once pr email adress in our database.

We also tried select distinct which was suggested in another thread, but it seemed to have no effect.

We also tried adding a counter to different places of the script, but it displayed the correct number of iterations.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Apr-28 at 08:41

You are calling $mail->send() twice:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43675603

QUESTION

Loop only checks one email

Asked 2017-Apr-26 at 12:52

We get email adresses from a database of users. We then want to check these email adresses in a api and return number of breaches.

The problem is that now it seems like it only checks the first email adress. When we have more than one, the first gets the correct number of breaches, the second only gets 0.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Apr-26 at 12:46

Look at your loop, or better at the line before your loop. You're doing:

$ch = curl_init(); - so you initalize a cURL session. You do this only once, since its outside of the loop.

Then, a few lines later, youre doing:

curl_close($ch); - you close the cURL session. You do this after every call, because its in your loop. So principally you initalize, run the cURL stuff (thats why it works for the first one) and then it stops to work, because you close your cURL session and never open a new one.

Simply take your the curl_close$ch); from your loop and put it at the end of your file, so you can execute all requests with the same session. Then it should work :)

Your end of the file should look something like:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43634258

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install websec

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: