git-st | Git remote helper
kandi X-RAY | git-st Summary
kandi X-RAY | git-st Summary
Git remote helper (for StarTeam. This remote helper allows Git to interact with remote StarTeam repositories. The fetch and push commands are based on the Git fast-import (and fast-export (protocols.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Entry point for the remote repository
- Reads all commits from the file
- Loads the files in the repository
- Executes the Git
- Main entry point
- Creates a new logger with the given level
- Returns the remote branch name
- Updates a ref
- Creates a new server connection
- Requests a configuration property
- Returns a string representation of this repository object
- Write file
- Writes the contents of a file to a PrintStream
- Returns a string representation of this repository
- Execute the file
- Compares this version
- Writes the tempignore to the given output stream
- Rename a file
- Entry point for the application
- Returns the hash of the previous import
- Gets configuration
- Copies a file
- Sort by commit id
- Get history of an item
- Writes the file to the output stream
- Compares this object to another
git-st Key Features
git-st Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on git-st
QUESTION
git log works fine and provides:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-10 at 03:49This is the result of having a bad tree object, namely 6e6758bea668ae2fb6271dec137927981548b581. The object itself either does not exist at all, or is invalid internally; the git fsck output implies the former.
It's not clear how you got into this situation, but git log by itself never notices because it obtains commit ac1d9fec39372683cd20fba15f9c5318b957cf25 which itself is intact. It's just that this commit refers to the missing tree object. As long as the software never tries to retrieve the missing object, nobody notices that it is missing. The bad (because-of-missing-tree, but not bad on its own) commit also refers to previous commit e6cdf4125529fcb8c0b0e131b12c4ab24012cdfd, which is good all the way around, and all previous commits are fine.
If you can find or re-create the missing tree object, the repository will be restored to usability. Alternatively, if you can replace the bad commit with a good one that refers to an existing or new tree object, the repository as a whole will be OK, although the stored snapshot that went with commit 6e6758bea668ae2fb6271dec137927981548b581 is gone.
QUESTION
Ultimately as of now I want a clean way to return to compact (e.g. bare) repo ready to be checked out (Ok, for pedantic ones: after additional core.bare false) to any branch. I've read top answers to How to convert a normal Git repository to a bare one?. Using clone looses config entries as mentioned in comments, below is the problem after trying to use accepted answer. Maybe there is an easy trivial fix to that and that is why I could not find it mentioned in the comments.
TL;DR
I'm trying to make sense of info related to bare git repos.
- To clone all branches: How to clone all remote branches in Git?:
Executed and it worked:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-09 at 01:00Changing core.bare from true to false is not supported. Don't expect anything to work.
If you know the innards of Git, you can make it work. (The instructions in the other SO answers were, at least in part, written by those who know how to make it work.) However, you then know why not to combine this with --mirror.
Having run git checkout, you created an index (aka staging area) in your bare repository. You'll need to remove the index (rm .git/index). That will fix things up, at least temporarily. But don't go converting bare to non-bare and back like this: it's not supported.
Consider leaving the bare repository bare: you can use git archive to get any commit you want from the bare repository. See the git archive documentation for details. The git branch and git log commands (and many others) work in a bare repository, allowing you to find hash IDs to supply to git archive.
QUESTION
I have created a project with a subproject in cmake. In the subproject I have a function which wants to access a variable from its defining scope (not the parent project scope).
This is my folder structure:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-10 at 13:10There is no "closure" semantic in CMake. Any variable's dereference uses the variable from the current scope. That is, if you call test function from the top-level CMakeLists.txt, the variable V is searched in the scope of that script, not from the scope of sub/CMakeLists.txt which defines given function.
Only special variables like CMAKE_CURRENT_FUNCTION_LIST_DIR or CMAKE_CURRENT_FUNCTION are exception from that rule: they are expanded according to the place (file, line, function) where they are dereferenced.
The example of the code which confuses you
QUESTION
I have an executable with multiple tests written with QTest.
The executable is being registered using add_tests(NAME test_name COMMAND test_executable). Obviously, tests will be handled as one in CTest, so it will be difficult to find the problem if one of the hundreds fails. It will be worse when new executables with tests are added.
Is it possible to register the tests separately like with GTest realizations? Is there an alternative to GTEST_ADD_TESTS or GTEST_DISCOVER_TESTS CMake functions for QTest tests?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-23 at 21:12Use ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET to run your tests.
QUESTION
it seems like a similar question with Untrack files from git temporarily but I can't find a good-working answer for me.
I'm running a python-django server and have trouble on git merge.
At the beginning of the project, a developer had committed all the *.pyc files on git, and these commits are used on the server as production code.
Now I have removed all the *.pyc files from the repository and make the proper .gitignore file.
But the problem occurs here.
Everything goes well till commit, but if I tried to merge it with production code, it emits an error.
Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by merge:
Of course, the troubled files are the *.pyc files.
I assume it's because the *.pyc files are already tracked in some commits, and when trying to merge, git judge that the local *.pyc files will be removed by the commits which have 'delete: *.pyc' internally.
Describe it as an example :
Let's say I'm on branch A and want to merge branch B to branch A.
The top commit of branch B has no *.pyc file. And the top commit of branch A has *pyc files on the working tree, but they're already removed from index(stage) by git rm --cached.
When I try git merge B on branch A the error Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by merge: occurs.
Is there any feature to resolve it in git?
P.S.: I'm new in StackOverflow and not fluent in English. If I made any mistake on this question or some phrases are hard to understand, please comment on me. Thank you.
Add git-status:
I can't upload the output with real file names, but it seems like below. Just the file names differ.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-30 at 15:06It seems you need to remove that file from your entire git history. In Pro Git, you can read the "Removing a File from Every Commit" section. You need to use git filter-branch command.
Example from the book for removing password.txt from all commits.
QUESTION
I want to run git-status and only show changes in the index or worktree respectively. While the human readable output somewhat separates those lines, the porcelain invocation does not.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-18 at 12:47git status --porcelain | grep "^\w." for index.
git status --porcelain | grep "^.\w" for working tree.
QUESTION
According to the documentation, the $ generator expression evaluates to 1, if the current configuration is one of the entries in cfgs and 0 otherwise. But how do I add more than one configuration to the cfgs-list?
The following snippet generates an error ($ expression requires one or zero parameters.)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-03 at 11:38Handling multiple configs in the $ generator expression has been introduced only recently with CMake 3.19. Versions before only accepted a single configuration argument to the generator expression.
QUESTION
echo "a" > file1.txt
git add file1.txt
git commit -m "add file1"
echo "b" > file1.txt
git stash
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-12 at 22:49A stash stores both the state of the index and the state of the working tree, because those are both things you might have in an incoherent or unfinished state. Making a stash puts both the index and the work area into commits and rolls both back to the head commit state; the index commit then has the current head as parent, and the work tree commit has the index commit and the current head as parents, making the stash’s content a merge commit. You can actually see this structure by doing a git log on your stash entry (your identifier numbers will be different of course):
QUESTION
I have a project that I am building with Cmake. It has the following directory structure:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-08 at 19:32I suggest that instead of adding it as a subdirectory, install and use it through find_package. Looks like the find_package support was implemented.
In your CMakeLists.txt:
QUESTION
Suppose I have three commits
A --> B' --> B
Commit B' represents an intermediate state, where work is unfinished and tests aren't passing. I may have made commit B' in order to switch from working on my home machine to my work machine.
Let's say I'm on a topic branch that no one is looking at but me. But all three commits are in the remote, otherwise I couldn't use B' to pass changes from one machine to another.
If I do git rebase -i (or if A is the first commit, then git rebase i --root), and I choose to fixup or squash commit B', then the changes in B' will be folded into commit A.
But this isn't appropriate. I want commits A and B to to represent reasonable checkpoints in the work, where changes aren't in a half-assed state that no one would understand but me. If I fixup the B' commit, then that will leave commit A with the half-baked changes that B' used to have. I want commit B' to be folded into B, since B' represented intermediate work towards commit B.
Possible solutions:
1a. Just leave commit B' and name it "dummy commit" so no one pays attention to it. It's on my topic branch (even though it's pushed to remote), so who cares.
1b. If I think people might potentially look at my current topic branch and judge me for being unprofessional, give B' its own branch that I'm sure no one cares about, then as soon as B is ready, commit it and merge it back into the original branch, then delete the temporary branch. So it looks like
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-22 at 21:54Use git rebase -i to squash B into B'. Use the squash instruction so that you get an opportunity to edit the commit message.
After the operation, others (and you) will only see a new commit B", and B and B' will soon be forgotten, and you do not have to worry that you "cheated" and folded B into B' instead of the other way round.
Of course, you will have to force-push the branch, but that does not matter, as you said, you are the only one looking at it. Under these circumstances, frequent force-pushing is not bad habit at all.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install git-st
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
