simplify | Android virtual machine and deobfuscator | Reverse Engineering library
kandi X-RAY | simplify Summary
kandi X-RAY | simplify Summary
There are three parts to the project: smalivm, simplify, and the demo app.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Do the actual initialization
- Execute a non - local method
- Finish the execution of a local method invocation
- Marks the state as unknown
- Cache all strings in base64
- Decode a string using a key
- Decodes encoded data
- Overrides superclass method
- Determines if an item is stored in an array item
- Execute a SMAL class
- Returns true if the given address can be cast to the given address
- Run the framework jar
- Returns a string representation of this attribute
- Builds a cloned cloned instance
- Get all prime primes
- Small helper method to generate a good idea
- Check if the given address is dead
- Execute the method
- Override this method to perform the compare operation
- Returns true if this instruction can be replaced by another method
- Create an operation from a method
- Sets the state of the array
- Creates a ConstOp
- Performs the actual work
- Returns a string representation of this constant
- Determine if the instruction is a dead result
simplify Key Features
simplify Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 35License : Permissive (MIT License)
Copydef sudoku(grid: Matrix) -> Matrix | None:
"""
Takes a partially filled-in grid and attempts to assign values to
all unassigned locations in such a way to meet the requirements
for Sudoku solution (non-duplication across rows, colu def simplifyFraction(numerator, denominator):
"""
input: two integer 'numerator' and 'denominator'
assumes: 'denominator' != 0
returns: a tuple with simplify numerator and denominator.
"""
# precondition
assert (
public static void pitfalls_simplifyComplexConditionsByReversingLogicExample() {
int count = 9;
int total = 100;
if (count < 10 && total < 1000) {
System.out.println("Some more work to do");
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on simplify
QUESTION
I am creating a Computation Expression (CE) for simplifying the definition of Plans for modelers. I want to define functions that are only available in the CE. In this example the compiler says that the custom operations step and branch are being used incorrectly but I don't see why. All the compiler is saying is that they are not used correctly.
...Note I know that I could define
stepandbranchoutside of the CE to accomplish this. This question is explicitly about using Custom Operators. I want to isolate this logic so that it is only available in the context of the CE.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-16 at 14:07It's because you're inside of the list at this point. The CE keywords only work directly at the "top level" of a CE, as far as I'm aware.
You could make a "sub" CE for the individual step and put keywords in there e.g.
QUESTION
I have the following code with multiple cases:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-04 at 12:51While you can certainly try using a Strategy pattern, there is a much simplier way to do this. Instead of the if/else chain you can simply do:
QUESTION
I would like to generate a list of combinations. I will try to simplify my problem to make it understandable.
We have 3 variables :
- x : number of letters
- k : number of groups
- n : number of letters per group
I would like to generate using python a list of every possible combinations, without any duplicate knowing that : i don't care about the order of the groups and the order of the letters within a group.
As an example, with x = 4, k = 2, n = 2 :
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-31 at 18:01Firstly, you can use a list comprehension to give you all of the possible combinations (regardless of the duplicates):
QUESTION
I'm working on a project where we are appling MISRA 2004.
On most of the violations I got the reason, but one I don't understand:
Its in the if-statement with && and || operations.
Example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-24 at 09:53This appears to be a false positive by your static analyser. Your code is compliant.
The rationale for MISRA C:2004 12.5 (and the equivalent rules in the 2012 version) is to avoid situations where operator precedence might not be obvious. Overall MISRA insists that sub-expressions involving binary operators ("complex expressions") should always have parenthesis.
In case of the boolean && and || operators specifically, the rule 12.5 allows chaining multiple of them in the same expression, but not mixing && and || in the same expression without parenthesis, since they have different precedence.
Had you written && (var_c == const_c1) || (var_c == const_c2) && then the code would be non-conforming. You didn't however, and you did also put parenthesis around the inner sub-expressions.
QUESTION
I want to use mapMulti instead of flatMap and refactored the following code:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-05 at 15:05Notice that the kind of type inference required to deduce the resulting stream type when you use flatMap, is very different from that when you use mapMulti.
When you use flatMap, the type of the resulting stream is the same type as the return type of the lambda body. That's a special thing that the compiler has been designed to infer type variables from (i.e. the compiler "knows about" it).
However, in the case of mapMulti, the type of the resulting stream that you presumably want can only be inferred from the things you do to the consumer lambda parameter. Hypothetically, the compiler could be designed so that, for example, if you have said consumer.accept(1), then it would look at what you have passed to accept, and see that you want a Stream, and in the case of getItems().forEach(consumer), the only place where the type Item could have come from is the return type of getItems, so it would need to go look at that instead.
You are basically asking the compiler to infer the parameter types of a lambda, based on the types of arbitrary expressions inside it. The compiler simply has not been designed to do this.
Other than adding the prefix, there are other (longer) ways to let it infer a Stream as the return type of mapMulti:
Make the lambda explicitly typed:
QUESTION
In a R Notebook there is a function that makes many plots and print summary statistics in the console. I would like to get the plot and the console output (i.e. summary statistics) side by side on the HTML output.
Here is a very simple example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-18 at 17:43For the example setup, I would recommend splitting up the operations to easily fit them side-by-side using pandoc syntax for multiple columns. In this way, we can just call the specifics we want.
QUESTION
I am trying to define a function that takes a data frame or table as input with a specific number of ID columns (e.g., 2 or 3 ID columns), and the remaining columns are NAME1, NAME2, ..., NAMEK (numeric columns). The output should be a data table that consists of the same ID columns as before plus one additional ID column that groups each unique pairwise combination of the column names (NAME1, NAME2, ...). In addition, we must gather the actual values of the numeric columns into two new columns based on the ID column; an example with two ID columns and three numeric columns:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-29 at 11:06Attention:
Here is an inspiring idea which is not fully satisfy OP's requirement (e.g., ID.new and number order) but I think it worth to be recoreded here.
You can turn DT into long format by melt firstly.
Then to shift value with the step -nrow(DT) in order to do
the minus operation, i.e. NAME1 - NAME2, NAME2 - NAME3, NAME3 - NAME1.
QUESTION
how to find the difference between two last versions of a Delta Table ? Here is as far as I went using dataframes :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-26 at 07:19This return a data frame with the comparative
QUESTION
I’m writing a pretty complex app in React/Redux/Redux Toolkit, and I came across a situation which I’m not really sure how to handle. I found a way to do it, but I’m wondering if it can cause issues or if there is a better way. The short version is that I want the reducer to communicate to the caller without modifying the state, and the only way I’ve found is to mutate the action.
Description:
To simplify, let’s say that I want to implement a horizontal scrollbar (but in reality it’s significantly more complicated). The state contains the current position, a number capped between some min and max values, and the UI draws a rectangle that has that position and that can be clicked and dragged horizontally.
Main property: If the user clicks and drags further than the min/max value, then the rectangle does not move further, but if the user then moves in the other direction, the rectangle should wait until the mouse is back at its original position before starting to move back (exactly like scrollbars behave on most/all operating system).
Keep in mind that my real use case is significantly more complex, I have a dozen of similar situations, sometimes capping between min and max, sometimes snapping every 100 pixels, sometimes more complicated constraints that depend on various parts of the state, etc. I’d like a solution that works in all such cases and that preserves the separation between the UI and the logic.
Constraints:
- I do not want the UI/component/custom hook to have the responsibility to compute when we reach the min/max, because in my use case it can be pretty complex and depend on various parts of the state. So the reducer is the only place that knows whether we did reach the min/max.
- On the other hand, in order to implement the Main property above, I do need to somehow remember where we clicked on the rectangle, or how many pixels of a given "drag" action was handled, in order to know when to start moving back. But I don’t want to store that in the state as it’s really a UI detail that doesn’t belong there (and also because I have quite a few different situations where I need to do that and my state would become significantly more complex, and unnecessary state changes will be performance heavy).
Problem:
So the reducer is the only part that knows if we reached the min/max, and the only way a reducer usually communicates to the rest of the app is through the state, but I don’t want to communicate that information through the state.
Solution?
I actually managed to find a way to solve it, which seems to work just fine but feels somewhat wrong: mutating the action object in the reducer.
The reducer takes the action "dragged by 10 pixels", realizes that it can only drag by 3 pixels, creates a new state where it has been dragged by 3 pixels, and adds an action.response = 3 field to the action.
Then after my custom hook dispatched the "dragged by 10 pixels" action, it looks at the action.response field of the return value of dispatch to know how much was actually handled, and it remembers the difference with the expected value (in this case it remembers that we are 7 pixels away from the original position).
In this way, if at the next mousemove we drag by -9 pixels, my custom hook can add that number to the 7 pixels it remembers, and tell the reducer that we only moved by -2 pixels.
It seems to me that this solution preserves separation of UI/logic perfectly:
- The reducer only needs to know by how many pixels we moved and then return the new state and how many pixels were actually handled (through mutating the action)
- The custom hook can remember how far off we are from the original position (without having to know why), and then it will simply correct
event.movementXto compensate with how much the reducer didn’t handle in previous actions, and then send the correct delta to the reducer.
It also works just fine with things like snapping at every 100 pixels or such.
The only weird thing is that the reducer mutates the action, which I would assume is not supposed to happen as it should be a pure function, but I couldn’t find any issue with it so far. The app just works, Redux Toolkit doesn’t complain, and the devtools work just fine as well.
Is there any issue with this solution?
Is there another way it could be done?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-19 at 16:23At a technical level, I can see how this could work. But I'd also agree it feels "icky". Very technically speaking, mutating the action itself qualifies as a "side effect", although it's not one that would meaningfully break the rest of the app.
It sounds as if the key bit of logic here is more at the "dispatch an action" level. I think you could likely call getState() before and after the dispatch to compare the results, and derive the additional needed data that way. In fact, this might be a good use case for a thunk:
QUESTION
Using Django 3.2 -- I will simplify the problem as much as I can.
I have three model classes:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-29 at 03:33- Foreign key classes use separate instances of managers, so there's no shared state.
- There's no information about the manager used on the parent instance either.
- As per django.db.models.Model._base_manager, Django simply uses
_base_manager:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install simplify
You can use simplify like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the simplify component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
