properties | JavaFX like properties
kandi X-RAY | properties Summary
kandi X-RAY | properties Summary
Sometimes it can be very useful to have JavaFX like properties in environments where you don't have JavaFX available (e.g. Android). If you would like to use it on Android just checkout the android branch. This branch contains the exact same code as the master branch but without using the Java 8 features.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Binds the property to this model
- Sets the property to update
- Binds the specified property to this property
- Binds the property to the given property
- Binds the property to this update
- Binds the property to its bound property
- Binds a property to this property
- Binds the specified property to this node
- Binds the property to the specified property
- Binds a property to this value
- Binds the property to the specified value
- Binds the property to this value
- Binds the specified property to this view
- Binds the value to this property
- Binds the value to the specified property
- Bind the property to this property
- Binds a property to the specified property
properties Key Features
properties Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 5
License : No License
Copyconst forOwnRight = (obj, fn) =>
Object.keys(obj)
.reverse()
.forEach(key => fn(obj[key], key, obj));
forOwnRight({ foo: 'bar', a: 1 }, v => console.log(v)); // 1, 'bar'
const defaults = (obj, ...defs) =>
Object.assign({}, obj, ...defs.reverse(), obj);
defaults({ a: 1 }, { b: 2 }, { b: 6 }, { a: 3 }); // { a: 1, b: 2 }
const forOwn = (obj, fn) =>
Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => fn(obj[key], key, obj));
forOwn({ foo: 'bar', a: 1 }, v => console.log(v)); // 'bar', 1
def check_color_properties(self) -> bool:
"""Check the coloring of the tree, and return True iff the tree
is colored in a way which matches these five properties:
(wording stolen from wikipedia article)
1. Each nod def GetOpProperties(self):
"""Get Op properties."""
props = tf_item.TF_GetOpProperties(self.tf_item)
properties = {}
for key, values in props.items():
prop = []
for value in values:
# TODO(petebu): Make this conver def python_properties(self):
return dict(
class_name=type(self.obj).__name__,
name=self.obj.name,
dtype=self.obj.dtype,
sparse=self.obj.sparse,
ragged=self.obj.ragged,
batch_input_shape=self.obj._b Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on properties
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-16 at 01:14The difference in behaviour can be accounted for by this behaviour, described in (for instance) the following note in ECMAScript 2022 Language Specification sect 14.3.2.1:
NOTE: If a VariableDeclaration is nested within a with statement and the BindingIdentifier in the VariableDeclaration is the same as a property name of the binding object of the with statement's object Environment Record, then step 5 will assign value to the property instead of assigning to the VariableEnvironment binding of the Identifier.
In the first case:
QUESTION
Is it possible to two reduce objects into one by summing their properties like so for any generic object
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-04 at 20:04A functional approach would be (but probably not clean)
QUESTION
I'm having trouble understanding why TypeScript is inferring a certain type for an array element when the type is a union type and the types 'overlap'. I've reduced it to this minimum repro:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 19:42See microsoft/TypeScript#43667 for a canonical answer. This is a design limitation of TypeScript.
As you might be aware: in TypeScript's structural type system, Child is a subtype of Base even though it is not explicitly declared as such. So every value of type Child is also a value of type Base (although not vice-versa). That means Child | Base is equivalent to Base... although the compiler is not always aggressive about reducing the former to the latter. (Compare this to the behavior with something like "foo" | string, which is always immediately reduced to string by the compiler.)
Subtype reduction is often desirable, but there are some places where Child | Base's behavior is observably different from Base's, such as excess property checks, IntelliSense hinting, or the sort of unsound type guarding that happens with the in operator. You haven't shown why it matters to you that you are getting a Base as opposed to a Child | Base, but presumably it's one of these observable differences or something like it.
My advice here is first to think carefully about whether or not you really need this distinction. If so, then you might consider preventing Base from being a subtype of Child, possibly by adding an optional property to it:
QUESTION
I want to collect the names (Jenny, Tiffany, etc.) that are stored in every object. and these objects live in an array. I've used Array.prototype.every() and Array.prototype.forEach(), but I don't think they are the right methods.
I also want to note that majority of these codes are from Codaffection. I am practicing on developing in React.
If you would like to experiment with the code, click here.
In every object, there is an id, fullname, email and etc.
This is the code that adds, edits, generates unique ids for each employee, and gets all storage data.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 19:27You mean to use map instead of forEach.
QUESTION
I have the following two interfaces, one which allows a nullable vin, the other that doesn't:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 18:49You can use a type predicate to define a user-defined type guard like this:
QUESTION
I wish to suggest (perhaps enforce, but I am not firm on the semantics yet) a particular format for the output of a PowerShell function.
about_Format.ps1xml (versioned for PowerShell 7.1) says this: 'Beginning in PowerShell 6, the default views are defined in PowerShell source code. The Format.ps1xml files from PowerShell 5.1 and earlier versions don't exist in PowerShell 6 and later versions.'. The article then goes on to explain how Format.ps1xml files can be used to change the display of objects, etc etc. This is not very explicit: 'don't exist' -ne 'cannot exist'...
This begs several questions:
- Although they 'don't exist', can Format.ps1xml files be created/used in versions of PowerShell greater than 5.1?
- Whether they can or not, is there some better practice for suggesting to PowerShell how a certain function should format returned data? Note that inherent in 'suggest' is that the pipeline nature of PowerShell's output must be preserved: the user must still be able to pipe the output of the function to Format-List or ForEach-Object etc..
For example, the Get-ADUser cmdlet returns objects formatted by Format-List. If I write a function called Search-ADUser that calls Get-ADUser internally and returns some of those objects, the output will also be formatted as a list. Piping the output to Format-Table before returning it does not satisfy my requirements, because the output will then not be treated as separate objects in a pipeline.
Example code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 18:36Although they 'don't exist', can
Format.ps1xmlfiles be created/used in versions of PowerShell greater than 5.1?
Yes; in fact any third-party code must use them to define custom formatting.
- That
*.ps1xmlfiles are invariably needed for such definitions is unfortunate; GitHub issue #7845 asks for an in-memory, API-based alternative (which for type data already exists, via theUpdate-TypeDatacmdlet).
- That
It is only the formatting data that ships with PowerShell that is now hardcoded into the PowerShell (Core) executable, presumably for performance reasons.
is there some better practice for suggesting to PowerShell how a certain function should format returned data?
The lack of an API-based way to define formatting data requires the following approach:
Determine the full name of the .NET type(s) to which the formatting should apply.
If it is
[pscustomobject]instances that the formatting should apply to, you need to (a) choose a unique (virtual) type name and (b) assign it to the[pscustomobject]instances via PowerShell's ETS (Extended Type System); e.g.:For
[pscustomobject]instances created by theSelect-Objectcmdlet:
QUESTION
So I initialized CAS using cas-initializr with the following command inside the cas folder:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 18:37Starting with 6.4 RC5 (which is the version you run as of this writing and should provide this in your original post):
The collection of thymeleaf user interface template pages are no longer found in the context root of the web application resources. Instead, they are organized and grouped into logical folders for each feature category. For example, the pages that deal with login or logout functionality can now be found inside login or logout directories. The page names themselves remain unchecked. You should always cross-check the template locations with the CAS WAR Overlay and use the tooling provided by the build to locate or fetch the templates from the CAS web application context.
https://apereo.github.io/cas/development/release_notes/RC5.html#thymeleaf-user-interface-pages
Please read the release notes and adjust your setup.
All templates are listed here: https://apereo.github.io/cas/development/ux/User-Interface-Customization-Views.html#templates
QUESTION
Sometimes I find myself needing to initialize an object with a property that matches the property of another object. When the property name is the same, I want to be able to use shorthand syntax.
(For the purposes of the examples in this question, I'll just keep the additional properties to a tag: 1 property, and I'll reuse message in subsequent examples as the input/source of the information. I also indicate an extra unwanted property of message because I'm cherry-picking properties and do not intend to just use Object.assign to assign all the properties of message to the result.)
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 16:26The best I have so far is
{ person: message.person, tag: 1 }.Is there shorthand initializer syntax to achieve this?
No, this is still they way to go.
hoping that a property name would magically be inferred from
person
QUESTION
When I call the method llaveCom.getName() I always get a null, I don't know why
Code of component"
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 15:59You should use constructor injection. And because you already injection Llaveompo you don't need to have @Value for the secret.
QUESTION
I created a new Quarkus app using the following command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 15:18Please enable the quarkus-smallrye-jwt TRACE logging to see why the tokens are rejected.
And indeed, as you have also found out, https protocol needs to be enabled in the native image, which can be done, as you have shown :-), by adding --enable-url-protocols=https to the native profile's properties in pom.xml.
This PR will ensure adding it manually won't be required.
thanks
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install properties
You can use properties like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the properties component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
