apis | OAuth Authorization as a Service | OAuth library
kandi X-RAY | apis Summary
kandi X-RAY | apis Summary
| WARNING: This project is no longer actively maintained. | |:-------| | If anyone is still using this and is willing to take over maintenance, please let us know and we can see how to arrange access. bas.zoetekouw@surfnet.nl pieter.vandermeulen@surfnet.nl|.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Send authn request .
- Verifies a given access token .
- Determine the redirect uri .
- Initialize the LogbackContext .
- Gets the verify token response .
- Does the actual authentication .
- Sends a PUT request to the given resource owner .
- Revoke an access token .
- Build response string .
- Process the initial request .
apis Key Features
apis Examples and Code Snippets
>>> import psutil
>>> for proc in psutil.process_iter(['pid', 'name']):
... print(proc.info)
...
{'pid': 1, 'name': 'systemd'}
{'pid': 2, 'name': 'kthreadd'}
{'pid': 3, 'name': 'ksoftirqd/0'}
...
>>>
>>> psutil
@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.authorizeRequests()
.regexMatchers("^/ratings\\?bookId.*$").authenticated()
.antMatchers(HttpMethod.POST,"/ratings").authentica
@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.httpBasic()
.disable()
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers(HttpMethod.GET, "/books").permitAll()
.antMatchers(HttpMeth
@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.csrf().disable().authorizeRequests(authorize -> authorize.antMatchers("/index", "/login")
.permitAll()
.antMatchers("/home", "/logout
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on apis
QUESTION
We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). I.e.,
Error 400: invalid_request
You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure.
You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules.
Request details:
The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google.
If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies.
redirect_uri: urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob
How do I get through this error? It is important to note that:
- The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal". Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant
- I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain
- Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different
- This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the
urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob
redirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser). - I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain. I have three client ids. The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022.
Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url
line. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here (version as of this writing).
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 07:56steps.oauth.v2.invalid_request 400 This error name is used for multiple different kinds of errors, typically for missing or incorrect parameters sent in the request. If is set to false, use fault variables (described below) to retrieve details about the error, such as the fault name and cause.
- GenerateAccessToken GenerateAuthorizationCode
- GenerateAccessTokenImplicitGrant
- RefreshAccessToken
QUESTION
This Message was appear when i upload my app bundle to play store
Your app currently targets API level 29 and must target at least API level 30 to ensure it is built on the latest APIs optimized for security and performance. Change your app's target API level to at least 30.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-04 at 02:48As per the new Google Play Policy starting from August 21 all new apps must target androidSdk version 30 and the same applies to app updates from November 21
You can read in detail here
EDIT: See @Syafiqur__ 's answer below for a detailed method on how to do so. Maybe OP doesn't clearly ask the methodology and that's why only the reason why that message came was told
EDIT2: See @AyoDavid 's answer for a more React-Native way to do so
QUESTION
Running Android Instrumented Tests, the gradle task :app:connectedDebugAndroidTest
now prints a red WARNING after a successful test run:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 13:06Downgrading Gradle worked for me
QUESTION
I am currently setting up a boilerplate with React, Typescript, styled components, webpack etc. and I am getting an error when trying to run eslint:
Error: Must use import to load ES Module
Here is a more verbose version of the error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 16:08I think the problem is that you are trying to use the deprecated babel-eslint parser, last updated a year ago, which looks like it doesn't support ES6 modules. Updating to the latest parser seems to work, at least for simple linting.
So, do this:
- In package.json, update the line
"babel-eslint": "^10.0.2",
to"@babel/eslint-parser": "^7.5.4",
. This works with the code above but it may be better to use the latest version, which at the time of writing is 7.16.3. - Run
npm i
from a terminal/command prompt in the folder - In .eslintrc, update the parser line
"parser": "babel-eslint",
to"parser": "@babel/eslint-parser",
- In .eslintrc, add
"requireConfigFile": false,
to the parserOptions section (underneath"ecmaVersion": 8,
) (I needed this or babel was looking for config files I don't have) - Run the command to lint a file
Then, for me with just your two configuration files, the error goes away and I get appropriate linting errors.
QUESTION
Xcode 13.2 Beta release notes features a promise for Swift Concurrency support for iOS 13.
You can now use Swift Concurrency in applications that deploy to macOS 10.15, iOS 13, tvOS 13, and watchOS 6 or newer. This support includes async/await, actors, global actors, structured concurrency, and the task APIs. (70738378)
However, back in Summer 2021 when it first appeared at WWDC it was hard constrained to be run on iOS 15+ only.
My question is: what changed? How did they achieve backwards compatibility? Does it run in any way that is drastically different from the way it would run in iOS 15?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-28 at 14:06Back-deploying concurrency to older OS versions bundles a concurrency runtime library along with your app with the support required for this feature, much like Swift used to do with the standard library prior to ABI stability in Swift 5, when Swift could be shipped with the OS.
This bundles parts of the Concurrency portions of the standard library (stable link) along with some additional support and stubs for functionality (stable link).
This bundling isn't necessary when deploying to OS versions new enough to contain these runtime features as part of the OS.
Since the feature on iOS 15+ (and associated OS releases) was stated to require kernel changes (for the new cooperative threading model) which themselves cannot be backported, the implementation of certain features includes shims based on existing functionality which does exist on those OSes, but which might perform a little bit differently, or less efficiently.
You can see this in a few places in Doug Gregor's PR for backporting concurrency — in a few places, checks for SWIFT_CONCURRENCY_BACK_DEPLOYMENT
change the implementation where some assumptions no longer hold, or functionality isn't present. For example, the GlobalExecutor
can't make assumptions about dispatch_get_global_queue
being cooperative (because that threading model doesn't exist on older OSes), so when backporting, it has to create its own queue for use as the global cooperative queue. @objc
-based actors also need to have their superclass swizzled, which doesn't need to happen on non-backdeployed runtimes. (Symbols also have to be injected in some places into the backdeploy libs, and certain behaviors have to be stubbed out, but that's a bit less interesting.)
Overall, there isn't comprehensive documentation on the exact differences between backdeploying and not (short of reading all of the code), but it should be safe to assume that the effective behavior of the backdeployed lib will be the same, though potentially at the cost of performance.
QUESTION
I'm experimenting with Hunspell and how to interact with it using Java Project Panama (Build 19-panama+1-13 (2022/1/18)). I was able to get some initial testing done, as in creating a handle to Hunspell
and subsequently using that to perform a spell check. I'm now trying something more elaborate, letting Hunspell give me suggestions
for a word not present in the dictionary. This is the code that I have for that now:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-24 at 21:41Looking at the header here: https://github.com/hunspell/hunspell/blob/master/src/hunspell/hunspell.h#L80
QUESTION
After a recommendation in Android Studio to upgrade Android Gradle Plugin from 7.0.0 to 7.0.2 the Upgrade Assistant notifies that Cannot find AGP version in build files, and therefore I am not able to do the upgrade.
What shall I do?
Thanks
Code at build.gradle (project)
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-06 at 03:17I don't know if it is critical for your problem but modifying this
QUESTION
I am writing a C++ coroutine for a UWP control using C++/WinRT:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-23 at 20:51This seems to be a legacy implementation for MSVSC. MSVSC implemented coroutines before the standard was formally complete, so there are two implementations of async (/async
and /async:strict
). I seem to have the old, non–standard-compliant version turned on.
The standard is clear that you cannot use plain return
statements in coroutines (emphasis added):
Coroutines cannot use variadic arguments, plain return statements, or placeholder return types (auto or Concept). Constexpr functions, constructors, destructors, and the main function cannot be coroutines.
— https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/coroutines
You can verify that this is a legacy behavior with a simple example (view in Godbolt):
QUESTION
How to memory-map a PCI Base Address Register (BAR) from a PCIDriverKit driver (DEXT) to a userspace application?
Memory-mapping from a driver extension to an application can be accomplished by implementing the IOUserClient::CopyClientMemoryForType in the user client subclass (on the driver side) and then calling IOConnectMapMemory64 (from the user-space application side). This has been very nicely and thoroughly explained in this related answer.
The only missing bit is getting an IOMemoryDescriptor corresponding to the desired PCI BAR in order to return it from the CopyClientMemoryForType
implementation.
Asked another way, given the following simplified code, what would be the implementation of imaginaryFunctionWhichReturnsTheBARBuffer
?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-16 at 17:01Turns out IOPCIDevice::_CopyDeviceMemoryWithIndex
was indeed the function needed to implement this (but the fact that it's private is still an inconvenient).
Bellow is some sample code showing how this could be implemented (the code uses MyDriver
for the driver class name and MyDriverUserClient
for the user client).
Relevant sections from MyDriver.cpp
implementation:
QUESTION
I am trying to set up Firebase with next.js. I am getting this error in the console.
FirebaseError: Expected first argument to collection() to be a CollectionReference, a DocumentReference or FirebaseFirestore
This is one of my custom hook
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-07 at 19:07Using getFirestore
from lite
library will not work with onSnapshot
. You are importing getFirestore
from lite
version:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install apis
You can use apis like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the apis component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page