mytaskmanager | Open source application for managing running apps | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | mytaskmanager Summary
kandi X-RAY | mytaskmanager Summary
My Task Manager
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Start animation
- Run enter animation
- Set image to view
- Start an animation
- Called when view is created
- Resets the navigation mode
- Set back listener
- Sets the status of the task
- Format memory size in KB
- Called when a progress panel is clicked
- Set the information about the navigation
- Gets all running processes
- Stop the application
- Resume the application
- Kill the current app
- Set the color for the event
- Called when the application is loaded
- Called when the application is killed
- Initializes the View
- Gets the current ram info
- Called when a menu item is selected
- Initializes installed apps
- On trim memory click
- Initializes the instance
- Initializes this instance
- On load more info
mytaskmanager Key Features
mytaskmanager Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on mytaskmanager
QUESTION
I'm currently new to Swift and am trying to learn a little more about Core Data. Perhaps it has to do with Database Design or it has to do with Entity Creation.
I decided to start with a simple ToDo app, where a user can save each task. I learned quickly that Core Data is great for this, as every time I save or fetch the data it is saved in some "background database"? or something..
I then wanted to develop something that came with a predefined list of tasks that a user may have to complete, and allow the user to "activate" various tasks. For example: the user can find a tableview of predefined tasks: Task A, Task B, Task C, etc... and then swipe to add Task B to an array of their active tasks in another view.
What is the best practice for something like this? Should I create two separate but identical objects in Core Data? Should I create a MyTaskManager entity which has a to-many relationship with Tasks and save it to Core Data or User Defaults? Should I not be using Core Data for either of these classes? I'm fairly confused.
Thanks for your help, in advance :)
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-07 at 01:33You can simply use a field in the Task Core Data Object named something like „isUserTask“ or „isActiveTask“.
In the other table or collection you show only the Task Objects where „isUserTask“ or „isActiveTask“ is true.
QUESTION
I have a .NET Core 2.1 project that has a BackgroundService
and I want its responsibility to just handle logging the result from a group of different tasks that can return different values. I want to group all of their output into a Task Manager class to log their output. Is it possible to have one List
that will contain all the Task
objects from these async methods?
I don't want to have multiple Task
fields for each method I want to await
on. I'd rather have them be put into a List
of some sort because there could be the possibility to have more than these three async methods I want this manager to manage.
I was thinking of doing something like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-13 at 15:16Tasks aren't covariant like that, but nothing is stopping you from casting the result as needed on your own:
QUESTION
I am using URLSession in my iOS project. (Swift 4). The following code is only for illustration purpose.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-01 at 13:19You should create a shared instance of the data session and use the same creating multiple tasks because it's rarely the case that you need to have a different configuration for an api.
I suggest and use the shared instance of data session for getting data from an api.
QUESTION
How to use notify and wait properly. I have just two threads to test my logic. Is it as follows i create one thread which will execute a command of the type get file_1 file_2
and create file3
with the type
cmd. My first task don't have file_2
so it will be put in wait state on a condition predicate that checks if the both files are present with .exists() method on the file. The second thread will create file_2
and it will notify the first thread then the other thread will wake up and execute his job. The problem is that after the thread that is waiting wakes up it doesn't have his job but the other's thread job. For example if Thread-1
have to execute file1 file2 > file3
and it is in a wait state. And Thread-2
have to execute file3 file4 > file2
so it creates the file2
and notify Thread-1
. After Thread-1 woke up it have file3 fil4 > file2
and not his files. I am dumping everything to the console and when the two threads are taking the tasks from the commands file they take the proper one's they don't have the same task but after Thread-1
woke up it have the Thread-2
task. Can someone help me to understand how to use wait and notify for this case and in any other of course. I have read Java Concurrency in practice but they have only put and take methods there with wait and notify also the examples in google are naive and they work as expected. Thanks in advance.
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-21 at 07:25The problem with mutual wait-notify calls in your case is the fact that that one thread can finish its job and invoke notify
before another thread invokes wait
. Notification is not "remembered" so if notify is called before actual wait
is, then waiting thread will wait forever (well, until another notify).
If I am not mistaken, you want T1 has to do some job, wait for some notification from T2 and then do some other + exit. If this is correct, it will be much simpler for you to use CountDownLatch
or Semaphore
Both can cancel effect of racing conditions mentioned above. Countdown latch can be "counted down" when other threads are waiting for it to do so, or prior that which will result in "waiting thread" to never have to wait as "the door is already opened".
QUESTION
I have a taskList object "holder" that contains a list of "task" objects. In a loop i read commands from a text file and on each line i add new task object with a command and add it into the "holder" object. The commands are of the form "cat source_file1 source_file2 output_file", if one of the files are missing i want the thread to wait, and proceed further with the new commands. I am trying to use a condition queue with the following predicate (if both files for the command exists wake up and do the work) until then sleep. I am using two threads for testing purpose when the first thread enters the wait state the program hangs forever and it not gives a chance to the other threads to produce the file that is missed for the waited thread.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-14 at 06:39You have no call to notify
. Also, the holder
you are synchronizing on doesn't actually protect anything. You have to use the lock to protect the shared state that you are waiting for a change in.
It sounds like you don't understand the point of conditions nor how they work. Simply put, they provide an atomic "unlock and wait" operation to fix the following problem:
- To check some shared state, we must hold a lock.
- To wait for the shared state to change, we must release the lock so another thread can change the shared state.
This will allow a deadlock without an atomic "unlock and wait" operation. That's what wait
is for -- it's an atomic "unlock and wait" to avoid the race condition if you unlock and then wait. If that's not the problem you have, then wait
is not the solution you need!
And that's not the problem that you have. So these aren't the droids you are looking for. Don't use synchronized
-- it's for communication between threads. And don't use wait
, it's for when you need an atomic "unlock and wait" operation to avoid a race condition.
QUESTION
I'm new to Android and I'm building small app in order to get the basics. I'm facing a dumb issue which, apparently, I can't seem to be able to fix.
I'm building a screen that looks like this on the designer
However, when starting the emulator, the design looks like this:
Can you please advice me what I'm doing wrong? My xml file is as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-21 at 07:55you need to use relative or Linear Layout to achieve what you are looking for. Following is the code for RelativeLayout
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install mytaskmanager
You can use mytaskmanager like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the mytaskmanager component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page