Evolve | Android Developers that lets them deploy new versions

The solution is add margin to the rows inside the right side,

So here is the solution, what was necessary was adding the correct Pen Settings.

You can add a bool type variables to keep state whether or not the pokemon has already been created. if it's the first time you'll create it, just change the value to true and it won't print it again the next time.

also, you can use Equals1("someString", StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase) instead of comparing the pokemon name twice.

A checksum is a sequence of numbers and letters used to check data for errors. If you know the checksum of an original file, you can use a checksum utility to confirm your copy is identical.

When you have a script name that already runs in the Evolve migration tool, a row is added to the changelog table that contains the name & checksum columns. The checksum is created based on the text of the script.

When you update the text of the script and runs the migration again, a new checksum is created for the same script name and it causes the error because each script should have only one checksum and there is already a row in the changelog for this script with a different checksum.

Therefore, I would advise you to update the script name or create a new script, both will solve this error.

This is probably due to the step size control being also influenced by the rapidly growing v vector. Either by regulating step sizes rapidly down due to stiffness, or more likely, due to increasing the step size to match the dominant components, thus becoming unsuitable for an exact integration of the original trajectory. This rapid growth is the reason that Lyapunov exponents were introduced, as they capture this growth in nicely bounded numbers.

What you can do is to split up the integration into smaller chunks and normalize the v vector at the start of each chunk. One would have to experiment on how long it takes until the v component unduly dominates the step size control. As the coupling is purely multiplicative, the dynamic theoretically is linear. So it could also help if you scale the initial v to have norm 1e-100.

First however check what error tolerances you use. Setting them narrower also tends to stabilize the computation. You might also get some progress be setting the maximal step size hmax to half or so of the external step.

Or you could do the Lyapunov exponent computation like I explored in https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/36013/numerical-computation-of-lyapunov-exponent. This approach however increases a system of dimension n by the n x n matrix of eigen/singular vectors and the n products of exponents times time.

As far as I can see your issue is caused by the lack of word wrapping. Your last table row has a long uninterrupted string: the link with the UTM-tags. If you'd remove the utm-tags from it, the cropping would not persist.

I'd start by looking for the domain model to tie this to - is a "quote" the same logical thing as a "booking"? Quotes typically have a different lifecycle to bookings, and bookings typically represent financial commitments. The fact they share some attributes is a hint that they are similar domain concepts, but it's not conclusive. Cars and goldfish share some attributes - age, location, colour - but it's hard to think of them as "similar concepts" at any fundamental level.

In database design, it's best to try to represent the business domain as far as is possible. It makes your code easy to understand, which makes it less likely you'll introduce bugs. It often makes the code simpler, too, which may make it faster.

If you decide they are related in the domain model, it may be a case of trying to model an inheritance hierarchy in the relational database. This question discusses this extensively.

You just need to display flex col itself, and apply the justify space between to let it grow with the content, think this is what you are after?

This should work: