enterprise-app | powerful Vaadin add-on to create web applications | Web Framework library
kandi X-RAY | enterprise-app Summary
kandi X-RAY | enterprise-app Summary
A Vaadin add-on to create web applications that integrate Vaadin, Hibernate, JasperReports and Quartz technologies.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Initialize the layout
- Set the visible table columns
- Adds a new container filter
- Adds a new filter
- Creates a database backup file
- Encrypt a file
- Returns a list of all database table names
- Gets the base criteria
- Creates a custom Restriction object for the given class
- Returns the identifier of the given item
- Initializes the context
- Get the content of a file
- Checks whether the item specified is a root item
- Gets the item ID for the given index
- Button click event
- Formats the value of a property
- Restores a database from a backup file
- Initializes the layout
- Updates the report report
- Change the content table
- Handle the value change
- Returns the data type of the given property
- Checks whether an entity has a child with the specified entity id
- Sets the parent of an item
- Add data row
- Returns the IDs of all items in the container
enterprise-app Key Features
enterprise-app Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on enterprise-app
QUESTION
i already know the difference between App Registration and Service Principal in Azure.There is also a good explanation in this post Difference between "enterprise application" and "app registration" in Azure.
However when an app registration is created,an application ID and a secret or certificate is created.In same time within a tenant is created also the service principal which refers to app registration.
So my question would be,do app registration and service principal have the same secret?If the secret for app registration expires and i update it,what happens with the secret of service principal,is it also updated? And vice versa, the secret for service principal expires and i update it, what happens with the secret of app registration,is it also updated?I guess no because the service principal inherits the setting from app registration.
Any explanation about the relationship between app registration's secret and service principal'secret would be helpful.
Update 31.01.2020 i have an app registration called sp-acr-mit-pull and also a corresponding service principal which refers to this app reg. and of course both have same app id and different objectid
Now if check the endDate of app registration,it is empty
If if check the endDate of SP,it shows me the expiry date
If i perform an update of service principal via command
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-25 at 05:19However when an app registration is created,an application ID and a secret or certificate is created.In same time within a tenant is created also the service principal which refers to app registration.
This is only when you create App Registration from Portal. In portal both are created simultaneously when an app is registered in Azure AD. But in CLI, PowerShell or any other programming way it is done manually by creating a app registration first and then associating it with the service Principal.
So my question would be,do app registration and service principal have the same secret?If the secret for app registration expires and i update it,what happens with the secret of service principal,is it also updated? And vice versa, the secret for service principal expires and i update it, what happens with the secret of app registration,is it also updated?I guess no because the service principal inherits the setting from app registration.
Both App registration and Service Principal Secret are used by one Azure AD client , So creating either depends on your requirement .
The secret of the App registration can be seen from Portal whereas its not the same for the secret of Service Principal. So , the App registration and Service Principal have the same secret but are independent of each other.
So , For example , if you create a secret for service principal from cli/any command (which is the only way to create secret for service principal as of now)
, then you will have to auto rotate it as well because the service principal secret will not be visible from portal . But at the same time if you create a secret for app registration then even if you forget to rotate it , it will be visible from portal as expired and you can rotate it then .
For More details on the difference and relationship between App registration and Service Principal , you can refer this Microsoft Documentation
.
QUESTION
I don't think these are duplicates:
- Save and Load data “the MVVM” way? - talking about "user settings" not data from the Model
- MVVM Saving in database using ICommand - talking about ICommand implementation stuff I think
I am creating a local application. The data entered by the user is either going to be stored in local files or in a locally hosted database. I am trying to figure out how I should structure the saving of the data. If it's relevant, I want the data to save only when the user requests a save (i.e. I don't want to be writing to a DB/file every time the data stored in the Model is changed).
[Side note it is recommended that the V, VM, and M are all kept in sync, yes? You don't want to only occasionally be updating the Model, correct?]
Going by the definitions in this article and this question the Model contains the business/application logic and the data and the ViewModel contains the presentation logic and translates the data from the Model into a presentable form. Managing (e.g. saving) does not really seem to fit very into either of these categories.
Question 1. Should the functionality for saving (and for that matter loading the data on application startup) be but in the ViewModel, the Model or some other entity, call it a Controller for lack of a better word.
Question 2. I am knew to both WPF and MVVM and am very interested in (/unsure about) application structure/architecture. How should the View notify the ViewModel/Model/Controller that the user has requested a save? Are Commands the right tool (I am not familiar with commands either I have just read about them a little). If a Controller is a good option what structure would it have, which MVVM components would it need to be aware of (or would it be blind to all of them). Where would it be constructed (maybe in App.xaml.cs?) or would it be a static object?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-26 at 06:18It seems to me that you are a little confused about the terminology from different patterns.
If we consider OOP patterns of APPLICATIONS (MVC, MVP, MVVM), then in them View is the GUI, and the Model is a layer working with real data, processing it, containing Business Logic.
This layer is universal and independent of the type of GUI used, and even of its presence or absence.
From the point of view of these patterns, any action with real data (including saving it) is a function of the Model.
But the Model itself is not one specific type, but a whole Application layer, which can even be implemented separately within the other Application (for example, a service running in the background without any GUI).
Therefore, the Model itself can be implemented in the form of many additional types: a core with Business Logic (it is under it that they most often mean the Model in the narrow sense of the term), Repository, services, etc.
A little confusion here is introduced by the fact that in some patterns (ADO, EF, etc.) the term Model is also used to denote some entities.
Let's say this is often used to denote the type EF reflecting a record in the database table.
From the point of view of MVC / MVP / MVVM patterns, these are not models, but entities: Database Entity, EF Entity, Business Entity, etc.
The model provides consumers not with real data (that is, not Business Entities), but already some kind of reflection of them (very often these are immutable DTOs).
Therefore, the answer to your question: Saving data is a function that MUST be implemented only in the Model. "Inside itself" the Model can deligate this to some of its separate parts, for example, the Repository.
ViewModel is also a MODEL. But it is designed to work with a certain type of View, so it must take into account the peculiarities of this type of View, its requirements.
For example, a ViewModel for WPF (this is almost always the case), must provide the Data necessary for the View in its properties, notify about a change in its state using the INotifyPropertyChanged, INotifyCollectionChanged, Icommand, IDataErrorInfo interfaces and other requirements.
In this case, the "real" Model serves as the data provider for the ViewModel.
Therefore, the ViewModel does not work with real data, but with its abstract reflection.
And "knowledge" about real data (including how and where to store it) is not available for the ViewModel.
Since you need to provide the user in the GUI with a way to explicitly save data, this must be implemented as a command in the ViewModel, which calls the required Model method in its executing method.
In this case, the Model means the entire corresponding layer.
That is, it is not necessarily the main part of the Business Logic Model.
It can be, for example, some kind of service that is part of the Model layer.
It should be understood that very often in practice deviate from the ideal MVVM implementation. Therefore, in practice, you can often see leakage in the ViewModel of non-specific functionality, both from the View side and from the Model side.
Even if you have to do this to simplify the implementation, then you must clearly understand that this is a deviation from MVVM, and although you implement some specific function in the ViewModel, in fact it is a function of the Model (or View).
On your second question.
The MVVM pattern is hierarchical: the top level is View, below it is the ViewModel, and at the bottom level is Model.
In such a hierarchical structure, the overlying layer possesses knowledge only about the underlying one.
That is, the View is "familiar" only with the ViewModel, and the ViewModel only with the Model.
And the Model, in general, does not "know" anyone.
The application itself (the App class) is not part of the MVVM pattern.
It is located, as it were, above all the layers and therefore "knows about everyone."
Usually, in application (maybe not in the App class, but at this level), layers are initialized, dependencies are created and injected, and other tasks are common for the entire application.
"Notice" in .Net refers to events.
To receive notifications from someone, you need to subscribe to the event of this object.
And for this you need to be "familiar" with it, that is, to have a link to it.
But the underlying layers are not familiar with the overlying ones.
Therefore, neither the ViewModel, let alone the Model, can subscribe to View events.
But there is no need for such a notice for the View.
Notifications are needed where the object wants to provide information about its change, but it does not know who needs it.
Those who want to receive such information subscribe to the events of the object themselves.
But the View "knows" who it wants to notify - this is the ViewModel.
Therefore, the View simply calls the required ViewModel method and passes the required parameters to it.
This is most commonly done in WPF by binding to a command-property in the ViewModel.
P.S. The article "The Model-View-ViewModel Pattern" presents a point of view that is very close to the one I have stated here, but in much more detail.
You may find it helpful to read it.
Quoting from this article:
Model
Model classes are non-visual classes that encapsulate the app's data. Therefore, the model can be thought of as representing the app's domain model, which usually includes a data model along with business and validation logic. Examples of model objects include data transfer objects (DTOs), Plain Old CLR Objects (POCOs), and generated entity and proxy objects.
Model classes are typically used in conjunction with services or repositories that encapsulate data access and caching.
QUESTION
Is there a way to pull list of Users for a given Enterprise Application from MS Graph? I can see that Azure portal is making this query:
https://main.iam.ad.ext.azure.com/api/ManagedApplications/{enterprise-app-id}/AppRoleAssignments
Thanks!
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-03 at 03:24According to the document:
If the resource service principal is an application that has app roles granted to users and groups, this will return all the users and groups assigned app roles for this application.
You can use this api to list all users or groups assigned to the enterprise application:
QUESTION
Thanks to the post that discusses the differences between App Registrations and Enterprise Applications, I understand the difference between these two concepts now.
Here's the situation I'm dealing with at work - I am able to create 'New registration' under App Registrations blade, however, when I go to the Enterprise Applications blade, the 'New Application' button is disabled for me. Azure AD indicates I have the 'User' role. What role/permissions should one have in order to be able to 'Add Application' in the Enterprise Applications blade?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-09 at 03:15Yes, normal user roles cannot register Enterprise applications. You need to have an administrator role.
You need to have one of the following roles: Global Administrator, Cloud Application Administrator, Application Administrator, or owner of the service principal.
please see: here.
QUESTION
so in MVVM architecture even in google samples we can see things like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-31 at 18:23the activity even tells the ViewModel to get data. this is again not the View's job.
Correct. The data fetch should be triggered either by ViewModel.init, or more accurately the activation of a reactive data source (modeled by LiveData, wrapping said reactive source with onActive/onInactive).
If the fetch MUST happen as a result of create, which is unlikely, then it could be done using the DefaultLifecycleObserver using the Jetpack Lifecycle API to create a custom lifecycle-aware component.
Refer to https://stackoverflow.com/a/59109512/2413303
since ViewModel doesn't have access to View, it can't show a dialog or navigate through the app directly!
You can use a custom lifecycle aware component such as EventEmitter (or here) to send one-off events from the ViewModel to the View.
You can also refer to a slightly more advanced technique where rather than just an event, an actual command is sent down in the form of a lambda expression sent as an event, which will be handled by the Activity when it becomes available.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install enterprise-app
You can use enterprise-app like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the enterprise-app component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page