sign | jar automatically signs an apk with the Android test | Encryption library

 by   appium-boneyard Java Version: 1.0 License: No License

kandi X-RAY | sign Summary

kandi X-RAY | sign Summary

sign is a Java library typically used in Security, Encryption applications. sign has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available and it has high support. You can download it from GitHub.

Automatically sign an apk with the Android test certificate. The public and private keys are embedded within the jar.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              sign has a highly active ecosystem.
              It has 376 star(s) with 119 fork(s). There are 26 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 9 open issues and 5 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 71 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a positive sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of sign is 1.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              sign has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              sign has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              sign code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              sign does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              sign releases are available to install and integrate.
              Build file is available. You can build the component from source.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed sign and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into sign implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Signs a certificate
            • Signs the given archive data and writes it to the output stream
            • Adds the otacert to the output
            • Adds the SHA1 checksums to the output manifest
            • Generate sign
            • Signs the input
            • Adds the SHA1 of each file to the output manifest
            • Signs the given ZIP file and writes it to the output stream
            • Get the contents of an InputStream as a byte array
            • Copies the given input stream to the output stream
            • Copies the given input stream to the given output stream
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            sign Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for sign.

            sign Examples and Code Snippets

            copy iconCopy
            const copySign = (x, y) => Math.sign(x) === Math.sign(y) ? x : -x;
            
            
            copySign(2, 3); // 2
            copySign(2, -3); // -2
            copySign(-2, 3); // 2
            copySign(-2, -3); // -2
            
              
            Return the sign of x .
            pythondot img2Lines of Code : 42dot img2License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)
            copy iconCopy
            def sign(x, name=None):
              r"""Returns an element-wise indication of the sign of a number.
            
              `y = sign(x) = -1 if x < 0; 0 if x == 0; 1 if x > 0`.
            
              For complex numbers, `y = sign(x) = x / |x| if x != 0, otherwise y = 0`.
            
              Example usage:
            
                
            Return the soft sign of x .
            pythondot img3Lines of Code : 17dot img3License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)
            copy iconCopy
            def softsign(x):
              """Softsign activation function, `softsign(x) = x / (abs(x) + 1)`.
            
              Example Usage:
            
              >>> a = tf.constant([-1.0, 0.0, 1.0], dtype = tf.float32)
              >>> b = tf.keras.activations.softsign(a)
              >>> b.numpy()  
            Return the sign of a float .
            pythondot img4Lines of Code : 16dot img4License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            def sign(self, u: float) -> int:
                    """
                    threshold function for classification
                    :param u: input number
                    :return: 1 if the input is greater than 0, otherwise -1
                    >>> data = [[0],[-0.5],[0.5]]
                    >&g  

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            TestFlight Can't add build to Internal Test group
            Asked 2022-Mar-30 at 14:46

            I have already published my app to the app store. I have already a couple of versions. I created an internal test group and an external test group.

            Today, I published a new version of the app to App Store Connect, which I want to add to the internal test group. But somehow, I can't select it. When I go to the Internal Test Group, there is no (+)-Sign next to Builds. When I go to the external Test group, there is. And when I select the build and click on the (+)-Sign next to Groups, I can't select the internal test group.

            I checked the build version. I should have incremented it correctly. I also tried to disable the other builds, but it still didn't work.

            Here are some screenshots:

            Any ideas what could be wrong here?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-02 at 15:13

            Okay, it seems the new build is added to Internal Testing automatically, and it just takes some time. So this can be closed.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69031467

            QUESTION

            Google OAuth 2.0 failing with Error 400: invalid_request for some client_id, but works well for others in the same project
            Asked 2022-Mar-30 at 14:21

            We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). I.e.,

            Error 400: invalid_request

            You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure.

            You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules.

            Request details:

            The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google.

            If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies.

            redirect_uri: urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob

            How do I get through this error? It is important to note that:

            • The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal". Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant
            • I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain
            • Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different
            • This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob redirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser).
            • I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain. I have three client ids. The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022.

            Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url line. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here (version as of this writing).

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 07:56

            steps.oauth.v2.invalid_request 400 This error name is used for multiple different kinds of errors, typically for missing or incorrect parameters sent in the request. If is set to false, use fault variables (described below) to retrieve details about the error, such as the fault name and cause.

            • GenerateAccessToken GenerateAuthorizationCode
            • GenerateAccessTokenImplicitGrant
            • RefreshAccessToken

            Google Oauth Policy

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71318804

            QUESTION

            Why is the return type of std::rand() not an unsigned int?
            Asked 2022-Mar-28 at 15:04

            std::rand said,

            int rand();
            Returns a pseudo-random integral value between ​0​ and RAND_MAX (​0​ and RAND_MAX included).

            Since it is guaranteed that a non-negative integer will be returned, why the return type is signed?

            I am not talking about if we should use it here. Is it a historical issue or some bad design?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 02:12

            There is much debate about unsigned. Without going too much into subjective territory, consider the following: What matters is not whether the value returned from rand() cannot be negative. What matters is that rand() returns a value of a certain type and that type determines what you can do with that value. rand() never returns a negative value, but does it make sense to apply operations on the value that make the value negative? Certainly yes. For example you might want to do:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71306268

            QUESTION

            Selenium-chromedriver: Cannot construct KeyEvent from non-typeable key
            Asked 2022-Mar-25 at 12:17

            I updated my Chrome and Chromedriver to the latest version yesterday, and since then I get the following error messages when running my Cucumber features:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-03 at 08:25

            It seems something has changed in the new version of ChromeDriver and it is no longer possible to send some special chars directly using send_keys method.

            In this link you will see how it is solved (in C#) --> Selenium - SendKeys("@") write an "à"

            And regarding python implementation, check this out --> https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/special-keys-in-selenium-python/

            Specifically, my implementation was (using MAC):

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70967207

            QUESTION

            Android studio - Generate signed APKs broke
            Asked 2022-Mar-15 at 13:50

            I just updated my Android studio to the version 2021.1.1 Canary 12. After struggling to make it work, I had to also upgrade my Gradle and Gradle plugin to 7.0.2. Now I can compile my project and launch my app on my mobile, everything is working. But when I try to generate a Signed APK, I get a strange message after building telling me: APK(s) generated successfully for module 'android-mobile-app-XXXX.app' with 0 build variants:

            Even though the build seem to be successful I cannot find the generated APK anywhere (and considering the time it takes to give me that error, I don't even think it is building anything). Now, I have been generating an APK every week for years now, so I know my way around the folders, the different build variant output folders etc... Nothing changed in my way of generating an APK. I do it via AS and follow the very standard procedure.

            Can someone point to me what am I missing here? I assume there is a way to select a specific build variant when generating a signed APK, how does it works?

            PS: Obviously, I am selecting my variant here during the process:

            PS2: I can generate a debug APK without any issue whatsoever.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-05 at 07:39

            After a few days of struggle, I ended up switching to Bundle. It achieves the same purpose for me and it actually works so... That's my solution here.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69408222

            QUESTION

            How to fix the error (TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'map' of object '#')
            Asked 2022-Mar-05 at 09:40

            I am sending my data to MongoDB via Mongoose. Now, during the fetch of API route for it, an error is thrown.

            Code

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 00:32

            This issue occured recently and apparently its happening with latest version of node.

            issue link

            So you can change the version of node to older version and it will be fixed. I am using node version v14.19.0

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71073107

            QUESTION

            android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify
            Asked 2022-Feb-23 at 14:13

            After upgrading to android 12, the application is not compiling. It shows

            "Manifest merger failed with multiple errors, see logs"

            Error showing in Merged manifest:

            Merging Errors: Error: android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for android:exported when the corresponding component has an intent filter defined. See https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element#exported for details. main manifest (this file)

            I have set all the activity with android:exported="false". But it is still showing this issue.

            My manifest file:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Aug-04 at 09:18

            I'm not sure what you're using to code, but in order to set it in Android Studio, open the manifest of your project and under the "activity" section, put android:exported="true"(or false if that is what you prefer). I have attached an example.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68554294

            QUESTION

            Terraform AWS Provider Error: Value for unconfigurable attribute. Can't configure a value for "acl": its value will be decided automatically
            Asked 2022-Feb-15 at 13:50

            Just today, whenever I run terraform apply, I see an error something like this: Can't configure a value for "lifecycle_rule": its value will be decided automatically based on the result of applying this configuration.

            It was working yesterday.

            Following is the command I run: terraform init && terraform apply

            Following is the list of initialized provider plugins:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-15 at 13:49

            Terraform AWS Provider is upgraded to version 4.0.0 which is published on 10 February 2022.

            Major changes in the release include:

            • Version 4.0.0 of the AWS Provider introduces significant changes to the aws_s3_bucket resource.
            • Version 4.0.0 of the AWS Provider will be the last major version to support EC2-Classic resources as AWS plans to fully retire EC2-Classic Networking. See the AWS News Blog for additional details.
            • Version 4.0.0 and 4.x.x versions of the AWS Provider will be the last versions compatible with Terraform 0.12-0.15.

            The reason for this change by Terraform is as follows: To help distribute the management of S3 bucket settings via independent resources, various arguments and attributes in the aws_s3_bucket resource have become read-only. Configurations dependent on these arguments should be updated to use the corresponding aws_s3_bucket_* resource. Once updated, new aws_s3_bucket_* resources should be imported into Terraform state.

            So, I updated my code accordingly by following the guide here: Terraform AWS Provider Version 4 Upgrade Guide | S3 Bucket Refactor

            The new working code looks like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71078462

            QUESTION

            Rails 7 - link_to with method :delete still performs GET request
            Asked 2022-Feb-10 at 18:02

            I am trying to get this link to work, performing a DELETE request:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-25 at 22:28

            As suggested here, the following will suffice:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70474422

            QUESTION

            Is it safe to bind an unsigned int to a signed int reference?
            Asked 2022-Feb-09 at 07:17

            After coming across something similar in a co-worker's code, I'm having trouble understanding why/how this code executes without compiler warnings or errors.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-09 at 07:17

            References can't bind to objects with different type directly. Given const int& s = u;, u is implicitly converted to int firstly, which is a temporary, a brand-new object and then s binds to the temporary int. (Lvalue-references to const (and rvalue-references) could bind to temporaries.) The lifetime of the temporary is prolonged to the lifetime of s, i.e. it'll be destroyed when get out of main.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70712797

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install sign

            You can download it from GitHub.
            You can use sign like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the sign component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/appium-boneyard/sign.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone appium-boneyard/sign

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:appium-boneyard/sign.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Encryption Libraries

            certbot

            by certbot

            Signal-Android

            by signalapp

            unlock-music

            by unlock-music

            client

            by keybase

            Signal-Server

            by signalapp

            Try Top Libraries by appium-boneyard

            sample-code

            by appium-boneyardHTML

            appium-ios-driver

            by appium-boneyardJavaScript

            php-client

            by appium-boneyardPHP

            tutorial

            by appium-boneyardRuby

            appium-dot-exe

            by appium-boneyardC#