gcm | Copy of Google 's gcm library repo

 by   avram Java Version: Current License: Apache-2.0

kandi X-RAY | gcm Summary

kandi X-RAY | gcm Summary

gcm is a Java library. gcm has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. However gcm build file is not available. You can download it from GitHub.

Copy of Google's gcm library repo
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              gcm has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 5 star(s) with 10 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              gcm has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of gcm is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              gcm has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              gcm has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              gcm code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              gcm is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              gcm releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              gcm has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.
              gcm saves you 1765 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 3904 lines of code, 254 functions and 48 files.
              It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed gcm and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into gcm implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Send message without retry .
            • Handle an intent event .
            • Sends a multicast message .
            • Sends a multicast message to the Datastore .
            • Checks the permissions for the application .
            • Registers the device .
            • Gets the demo .
            • Returns a string representation of this message .
            • Retrieves the key from the path .
            • Returns a list of unique devices for a given key
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            gcm Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for gcm.

            gcm Examples and Code Snippets

            AES-256-GCM Example
            Pythondot img1Lines of Code : 33dot img1no licencesLicense : No License
            copy iconCopy
            pip install pycryptodome
            
            
            from Crypto.Cipher import AES
            import binascii, os
            
            def encrypt_AES_GCM(msg, secretKey):
                aesCipher = AES.new(secretKey, AES.MODE_GCM)
                ciphertext, authTag = aesCipher.encrypt_and_digest(msg)
                return (ciphertext, ae  
            AES-256-GCM + Scrypt Example
            Pythondot img2Lines of Code : 31dot img2no licencesLicense : No License
            copy iconCopy
            from Crypto.Cipher import AES
            import scrypt, os, binascii
            
            def encrypt_AES_GCM(msg, password):
                kdfSalt = os.urandom(16)
                secretKey = scrypt.hash(password, kdfSalt, N=16384, r=8, p=1, buflen=32)
                aesCipher = AES.new(secretKey, AES.MODE_GCM)
              
            Encrypt the given data using GCM .
            javadot img3Lines of Code : 6dot img3License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            public byte[][] gcmEncrypt(SecretKey key, byte[] iv, byte[] data) throws GeneralSecurityException {
                    Cipher cipher = Cipher.getInstance("AES/GCM/NoPadding");
                    cipher.init(Cipher.ENCRYPT_MODE, key, new GCMParameterSpec(128, iv));
                     
            Decrypts the specified ciphertext using GCM .
            javadot img4Lines of Code : 6dot img4License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            public byte[] gcmDecrypt(SecretKey key, byte[] iv, byte[] ciphertext) throws GeneralSecurityException {
                    Cipher cipher = Cipher.getInstance("AES/GCM/NoPadding");
                    cipher.init(Cipher.DECRYPT_MODE, key, new GCMParameterSpec(128, iv));
                 

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Fixing git HTTPS Error: "bad key length" on macOS 12
            Asked 2022-Mar-29 at 17:34

            I am using a company-hosted (Bitbucket) git repository that is accessible via HTTPS. Accessing it (e.g. git fetch) worked using macOS 11 (Big Sur), but broke after an update to macOS 12 Monterey. *

            After the update of macOS to 12 Monterey my previous git setup broke. Now I am getting the following error message:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-02 at 07:12

            Unfortunately I can't provide you with a fix, but I've found a workaround for that exact same problem (company-hosted bitbucket resulting in exact same error). I also don't know exactly why the problem occurs, but my best guess would be that the libressl library shipped with Monterey has some sort of problem with specific (?TLSv1.3) certs. This guess is because the brew-installed openssl v1.1 and v3 don't throw that error when executed with /opt/homebrew/opt/openssl/bin/openssl s_client -connect ...:443

            To get around that error, I've built git from source built against different openssl and curl implementations:

            1. install autoconf, openssl and curl with brew (I think you can select the openssl lib you like, i.e. v1.1 or v3, I chose v3)
            2. clone git version you like, i.e. git clone --branch v2.33.1 https://github.com/git/git.git
            3. cd git
            4. make configure (that is why autoconf is needed)
            5. execute LDFLAGS="-L/opt/homebrew/opt/openssl@3/lib -L/opt/homebrew/opt/curl/lib" CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/homebrew/opt/openssl@3/include -I/opt/homebrew/opt/curl/include" ./configure --prefix=$HOME/git (here LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS include the libs git will be built against, the right flags are emitted by brew on install success of curl and openssl; --prefix is the install directory of git, defaults to /usr/local but can be changed)
            6. make install
            7. ensure to add the install directory's subfolder /bin to the front of your $PATH to "override" the default git shipped by Monterey
            8. restart terminal
            9. check that git version shows the new version

            This should help for now, but as I already said, this is only a workaround, hopefully Apple fixes their libressl fork ASAP.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69734654

            QUESTION

            WebCryptoApi: Cannot wrap&unwrap aes-gcm key into&from "jwk" format with "encrypt" and "decrypt" active
            Asked 2022-Mar-06 at 16:30

            I'm generating a key for encrypting data, then wrap it using a master key and store it alongside the encrypted data. All is well when wrapping into raw format, but when wrapping as jwk I get the error DOMException: Data provided to an operation does not meet requirements.

            It works when specifying they key for being used either for encryption or for decryption, but not when both are specified as key usages.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-06 at 16:30

            AES-KW is a key wrap algorithm described in RFC3394. The algorithm is used to wrap i. e. encrypt a key. The input, i.e. the key to be encrypted, must be an integer multiple of 8 bytes, s. also here.

            The key to be encrypted is passed in SubtleCrypto.wrapKey() in the 2nd parameter key as CryptoKey and must therefore be exported before the actual encryption. For this purpose the format in which the key is exported is specified in the 1st parameter format:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71365564

            QUESTION

            BitBucket: You are using an account password for Git over HTTPS
            Asked 2022-Mar-01 at 19:41

            Today I got the following message when I used Git + BitBucket on MacOS while pushing a new branch to BitBucket.

            You are using an account password for Git over HTTPS.

            Beginning March 1, 2022, users are required to use app passwords remote: for Git over HTTPS. To avoid any disruptions, change the password used in your Git client remote: to an app password. Note, these credentials may have been automatically stored in your Git client and/or a credential manager such as Git Credential Manager (GCM).'

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-31 at 09:00

            In my case, I used BitBucket via HTTPS and not via SSH. Therefore I had to change it.

            1. Follow this guide to create and add a new SSH key.
            2. Follow this guide to switch from HTTPS to SSH.

            Unrelated and optional:

            While you are at this security related task, activate 2FA in your BitBucket security settings.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70832548

            QUESTION

            Targeting S+ (version 31 and above) requires that one of FLAG_IMMUTABLE or FLAG_MUTABLE be specified when creating a PendingIntent, On AlarmPingSender
            Asked 2022-Feb-20 at 16:06
            Problem

            Targeting S+ (version 31 and above) requires that one of FLAG_IMMUTABLE or FLAG_MUTABLE be specified when creating a PendingIntent. I got it after updating target SDK to 31. the error always come after AlarmPingSender. But i dont know any class that used AlarmPingSender.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-31 at 07:02

            Possible solution

            Upgrade google analytics to firebase analaytics. Hope it'll solve your problems.Also upgrade all the library what're you using.

            For me below solutions solve the problem.

            Add PendingIntent.FLAG_IMMUTABLE to your pending intents.

            Here is an example -

            PendingIntent pendingIntent = PendingIntent.getActivity(this, alarmID, notificationIntent, PendingIntent.FLAG_IMMUTABLE);

            For further information follow this link - https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/PendingIntent#FLAG_IMMUTABLE

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69783824

            QUESTION

            Paramiko authentication fails with "Agreed upon 'rsa-sha2-512' pubkey algorithm" (and "unsupported public key algorithm: rsa-sha2-512" in sshd log)
            Asked 2022-Jan-13 at 14:49

            I have a Python 3 application running on CentOS Linux 7.7 executing SSH commands against remote hosts. It works properly but today I encountered an odd error executing a command against a "new" remote server (server based on RHEL 6.10):

            encountered RSA key, expected OPENSSH key

            Executing the same command from the system shell (using the same private key of course) works perfectly fine.

            On the remote server I discovered in /var/log/secure that when SSH connection and commands are issued from the source server with Python (using Paramiko) sshd complains about unsupported public key algorithm:

            userauth_pubkey: unsupported public key algorithm: rsa-sha2-512

            Note that target servers with higher RHEL/CentOS like 7.x don't encounter the issue.

            It seems like Paramiko picks/offers the wrong algorithm when negotiating with the remote server when on the contrary SSH shell performs the negotiation properly in the context of this "old" target server. How to get the Python program to work as expected?

            Python code

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-13 at 14:49

            Imo, it's a bug in Paramiko. It does not handle correctly absence of server-sig-algs extension on the server side.

            Try disabling rsa-sha2-* on Paramiko side altogether:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70565357

            QUESTION

            node js https minDHSize not closing connection
            Asked 2021-Oct-24 at 09:26

            I am making an https request to a server that supplies a 2048 bit Diffie-Hellman cipher, and trying to get my code to reject the connection and issue a handshake failure back to the server and close the connection. I don't think its used, but I have a 4096 bit DH key in the client, and the connection is made perfectly if the server also uses a 4096 bit DH key.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-24 at 09:26

            There is no message coming from the client to indicate a handshake failure and the TCP connection has not been closed.

            The handshake, as such, does not fail. OpenSSL has no facility to require a minimum classic-DH size in keyexchange (for DHE and DH_anon which OpenSSL calls ADH), so nodejs enforces this limit after OpenSSL completes the handshake but before allowing any data to pass -- as it also does for the server cert name check, which OpenSSL originally didn't implement and now implements differently from what nodejs chose. See onSecureConnect in _tls_wrap.js .

            The TCP connection is closed, and that is probably why your server is sending close_notify -- or trying to; this send will actually fail because of the TCP closure. The servers I tested (OpenSSL and Java) both show TCP closed from the (nodejs) client, although OpenSSL does so implicitly (as read count 0), and they respond differently: only older Java 8 (before the new 11 stack was backported in 8u261) tried to send close_notify in 'response'. I suspect your server just isn't logging the TCP closure; try an external tool like wireshark or similar.

            To be clear, you set in the client 4096-bit DH parameters, not a key. Only the parameters are set in the server; the keys at both ends are generated per-handshake (in the subgroup defined by the parameters) which is why they are called ephemeral. And (user-chosen) DH parameters set in the client are ignored (but see next).

            FYI: There is a fairly recent protocol option, RFC7919, for TLS1.2* to use standardized (not user-chosen) DHE/anon groups, now called FFDHE to distinguish from ECDHE, which the client can request with the former supported_curves extension now repurposed as supported_groups (in particular it could demand 4096), but OpenSSL and thus nodejs does not implement this option. In 1.3 supported_groups is required, but the FFDHE groups are not required or even particularly encouraged, and AFAICT OpenSSL doesn't (yet?) support them there either -- and anyway 1.3 doesn't allow 'anon' at all. (* Formally 7919 applies to 1.1 and 1.0 also, but I can't imagine any implementation includes 7919 but not 1.2, so you would never need lower protocols.)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69691988

            QUESTION

            unable to make tls1.2 connection via CLI
            Asked 2021-Oct-24 at 01:55

            When I do openssl s_client -CApath ~/cacert.pem -crlf -connect getcomposer.org:443 -servername getcomposer.org I get the following output:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-23 at 21:25

            This is a stab in the dark, as I don't understand that openssl output much, but judging by the timing and the keywords 'openssl' and 'Lets Encrypt' this has a reasonably high chance of success.

            On September 30, 2021 Let's Encrypt's old Root Certificate has expired. This had a major implication that now they have started to use their own root cert which should be trusted by most devices. 'Most' part was troublesome as there are some devices alive which did not receive updates in years. So the people at Let's Encrypt found a way to still remain supported/trusted on those devices, just under one condition - its openssl version must be 1.1.0+ (which is already 4+ years old). Another important detail is that this openssl version requirement also applies to systems that would have otherwise trusted LE's new cert.

            So I've seen numerous people over October scrambling to get LE issued certificates to be trusted again by their systems and the answer was always as simple as: Get your openssl / libopenssl updated to v1.1.0+

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69564881

            QUESTION

            Git for Windows: SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired
            Asked 2021-Oct-18 at 13:33

            I am aware that Let's Encrypt made changes that may impact older clients because a root certificate would expire. See DST Root CA X3 Expiration (September 2021).

            However, I didn't think this could impact me because my development machine is up-to-date.

            But since today I get the message while doing a git pull:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-17 at 13:39

            I was facing a similar issue with DevOps build agents. But I can access the DevOps server web interface without any issue.

            To solve this,

            • I updated my Let's Encrypt client (I'm using Certify The Web)
            • I have renewed my certificate

            After that, the DevOps agent is able to do a Git pull.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69387175

            QUESTION

            Why can I not connect to an RDS Aurora DB via proxy?
            Asked 2021-Sep-16 at 06:04

            I setup a Postgresql Aurora DB and a Proxy via Terraform (code below), which is apparently running fine. But for some reason I can not connect to the DB through the proxy. The proxy claims that there are lacking credentials for the role, but if I connect directly to the DB everything is fine and the credentials are working.

            I tried this from a VPN and directly from an EC2 instance:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-16 at 06:04

            Your aws_iam_policy policy has no effect. You forgot to associate it with the role:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69190356

            QUESTION

            Nodejs AES-256-GCM decrypt the encrypted client message by webcrypto api
            Asked 2021-Sep-12 at 11:22

            I've Encrypted my text by a key in Client by AES-256-GCM algorithm and I can decrypt it in Client, But when I send it to the Backend which has a SharedKey(the same as the Client has), it can decrypt the message by AES-256-CTR algorithm(I used this algo because the AES-256-GCM in Nodejs needs authTag that I don't create it in Client and iv is the only thing I have).

            When I decrypt the message on the Backend side, it works with no error, but the result is not what I encrypted in the Client

            Here is what I wrote: Client:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-11 at 08:13

            Since GCM is based on CTR, decryption with CTR is in principle also possible. However, this should generally not be done in practice, since it skips the authentication of the ciphertext, which is the added value of GCM over CTR. The correct way is to decrypt on the NodeJS side with GCM and properly consider the authentication tag.
            The authentication tag is automatically appended to the ciphertext by the WebCrypto API, while the crypto module of NodeJS handles ciphertext and tag separately. Therefore, not only the nonce but also the authentication tag must be separated on the NodeJS side.

            The following JavaScript/WebCrypto code demonstrates the encryption:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69139123

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install gcm

            You can download it from GitHub.
            You can use gcm like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the gcm component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/avram/gcm.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone avram/gcm

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:avram/gcm.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Consider Popular Java Libraries

            CS-Notes

            by CyC2018

            JavaGuide

            by Snailclimb

            LeetCodeAnimation

            by MisterBooo

            spring-boot

            by spring-projects

            Try Top Libraries by avram

            zandy

            by avramJava

            libzotero-java

            by avramJava

            identifiers-js

            by avramJavaScript

            translit

            by avramJavaScript

            qbsql

            by avramPHP