EasyCamera | 云平台组件：EasyCamera云摄像机方案

by babosa Java Version: v1.1.17.0311 License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | EasyCamera Summary

EasyCamera is a Java library. EasyCamera has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However EasyCamera build file is not available. You can download it from GitHub.

云平台组件：EasyCamera云摄像机方案,支持云直播、云控制、云录像、云回放的摄像机方案！EasyCamera保持与EasyCMS长连接，注册在EasyCMS上。当有EasyClient客户端发出视频播放、云台控制、语音喊话等指令时，EasyCMS会将相应的指令转发给对应的EasyCamera设备，EasyCamera根据指令办事。iOS平台代码迁移在

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

EasyCamera has a low active ecosystem.

It has 118 star(s) with 87 fork(s). There are 26 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 3 open issues and 0 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 995 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of EasyCamera is v1.1.17.0311

Quality

EasyCamera has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

EasyCamera has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

EasyCamera code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

EasyCamera does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

EasyCamera releases are available to install and integrate.

EasyCamera has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

EasyCamera saves you 2058 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 4520 lines of code, 233 functions and 40 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed EasyCamera and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into EasyCamera implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Create the window
Start a record
Pump a buffer into the stream
Initializes the spninner
Add a string to the queue
Decompress a byte array
Process Push OK
Build out stream content
Create the content
Saves a string into the preferences
Get the drop down view
Get view at specific position
Save buffer to file
Encode source
Handle click
Cleanup service
Rotate image
Creates the splash activity
Gets XPS
Determine the closest supported picture resolution
On receive broadcast
Do keepalive
Set the view orientation
Read line
Draws the status information
Initializes the system

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

EasyCamera Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for EasyCamera.

EasyCamera Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for EasyCamera.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on EasyCamera

transmitted getUserMedia / MediaRecorder video format larger than requested format. How to tell?

ffmpeg through python subprocess fails to find camera

QUESTION

transmitted getUserMedia / MediaRecorder video format larger than requested format. How to tell?

Asked 2019-Feb-02 at 17:43

Background:

On Windows 10 I'm using getUserMedia (gUM) and MediaRecorder in Google Chrome (v71) to capture and encode a video stream.

I'm using the constraints parameter to gUM to tell it I want a video format of 352x288.
I'm requesting video/webm; codecs="avc1.42E01E" as the MIME type of the encoded stream (that's H.264 boxed in Matroska).
I'm selecting a cheezy webcam built into a laptop as the video source. It's called "EasyCamera" made by DMAX-AVC. It's tempting to call it CheezyCamera.

The video stream gets generated just fine.

Problem:

The dimensions of the encoded video in the stream are 440x360 rather than my requested 352x288. This information is embedded in the recorded stream, and only visible from the consumer of that data. Use of the various APIs reveals the gUM stream, MediaRecorder, and element metadata all think the dimensions are the ones I asked for.

Of course, webcam, gUM, and MediaRecorder treat the constraints parameter as suggestions, and are free to respond with something different. In this case they respond with 440x360 when I request 352x288. This system functions as designed; that is not my problem.

To clarify, the unexpected 440x360 dimensions are only visible to the consumer of the recorded stream. I hope to find a way to know the producer-side webcam, gUM, and MediaEncoder signal chain is producing a different resolution than I requested.

How does the stream consumer know the stream dimensions? They're in the 'PixelWidth' and 'PixelHeight' Matroska boxes, and they're baked in to the H.264 stream. (Oddly enough, considering this is a software-chosen resolution, it isn't an integral number of 16x16 macroblocks. It still works of course.)

I can't parse the recorded data in the browser because it's stored in opaque blobs.

When I use a different, better, webcam (a Logitech C615) my encoded video stream is the size I requested.

My question:

Is there any way in the webcam / gUM / MediaRecorder / signal chain to find the actual dimensions of the encoded stream in the browser actually recording the stream? That is, can I find the signal chain's response to my requested dimensions without decoding the generated stream?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jan-27 at 19:43

Use MediaStream.getVideoTracks() method to get the video track (MediaStreamTrack), then use MediaStreamTrack.getSettings() to get MediaTrackSettings object, which contains the height and width of the video of the stream.

So if I request a video of 0 height specified as Constraints, I get a video of height 1 pixels. While streaming we can retrieve both the height I requested and the height I am getting as output.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54352289

QUESTION

ffmpeg through python subprocess fails to find camera

Asked 2017-Jun-04 at 09:11

Weird problem here, i use this command to capture my webcam through ffmpeg (through cmd on windows):

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jun-04 at 09:11

The problem is that, in the commandline, video="Lenovo EasyCamera" uses the quotes to make sure the space doesn't make it another argument.

You can see this with a test python file:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44352242

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install EasyCamera

You can download it from GitHub.
You can use EasyCamera like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the EasyCamera component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: