auth | Get started with the Android Authentication Framework | Authentication library

by bleeding182 Java Version: v0.4.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | auth Summary

auth is a Java library typically used in Security, Authentication applications. auth has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Provides a tested implementation for the Android Account Framework for you to get rid of SharedPreference based authentication.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

auth has a low active ecosystem.

It has 27 star(s) with 7 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 2 open issues and 1 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 44 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of auth is v0.4.0

Quality

auth has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

auth has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

auth code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

auth is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

auth releases are available to install and integrate.

Build file is available. You can build the component from source.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed auth and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into auth implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Get auth token
Checks if one thread is available
Send result to queue
Creates the result bundle
When a new intent is added to the user UI
Start authorization flow
Format a list of scopes
Returns the basic authentication string for the client ID
Helper method to add account information
Prints a bundle as a JSON string
Finishes the login process
Registers an account with the specified token
Authenticate a new request
Sets the value of the account view
When the activity is created the activity is created
Intercept the access token
Starts the authorization flow
Called when accounts are updated
Gets account data by key
Logs out the account
Renames an account
Sets account data

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

auth Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for auth.

auth Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for auth.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on auth

Google OAuth 2.0 failing with Error 400: invalid_request for some client_id, but works well for others in the same project

The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported

Error: [PrivateRoute] is not a component. All component children of must be a or

android:exported added but still getting error Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for android:exported

Can't find variable: IDBIndex on firebase/react native(expo)

How to fix the error (TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'map' of object '#')

throwError(error) is now deprecated, but there is no new Error(HttpErrorResponse)

Github Actions Failing

android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify

Android Build Error: "lStar not found..."

QUESTION

Google OAuth 2.0 failing with Error 400: invalid_request for some client_id, but works well for others in the same project

Asked 2022-Mar-30 at 14:21

We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). I.e.,

Error 400: invalid_request

You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure.

You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules.

Request details:

The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google.

If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies.

redirect_uri: urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob

How do I get through this error? It is important to note that:

The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal". Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant
I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain
Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different
This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob redirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser).
I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain. I have three client ids. The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022.

Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url line. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here (version as of this writing).

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 07:56

steps.oauth.v2.invalid_request 400 This error name is used for multiple different kinds of errors, typically for missing or incorrect parameters sent in the request. If is set to false, use fault variables (described below) to retrieve details about the error, such as the fault name and cause.

GenerateAccessToken GenerateAuthorizationCode
GenerateAccessTokenImplicitGrant
RefreshAccessToken

Google Oauth Policy

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71318804

QUESTION

The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported

Asked 2022-Mar-27 at 13:23

I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01

First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".

January 11, 2022 Final brownout.

This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.

Second, check your package.json dependencies for any git:// URL, as in this example, fixed in this PR.

As noted by Jörg W Mittag:

There was a 4-month warning.
The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.

Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".

Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.

The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.

For GitHub Actions:

As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70663523

QUESTION

Error: [PrivateRoute] is not a component. All component children of must be a or

Asked 2022-Mar-24 at 16:08

I'm using React Router v6 and am creating private routes for my application.

In file PrivateRoute.js, I've the code

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Nov-12 at 21:20

I ran into the same issue today and came up with the following solution based on this very helpful article by Andrew Luca

In PrivateRoute.js:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69864165

QUESTION

android:exported added but still getting error Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for android:exported

Asked 2022-Mar-24 at 15:30

I have added android:exported="true" to my only activity in manifest but still getting below error after updating compile sdk and target sdk version to 31.I also tried rebuilding the project , invalidating cache and restart but that didn't helped

Error- Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for android:exported when the corresponding component has an intent filter defined. See https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element#exported for details.

AndroidManifest File ...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Oct-05 at 10:38

After the build has failed go to AndroidManifest.xml and in the bottom click merged manifest see which activities which have intent-filter but don't have exported=true attribute. Or you can just get the activities which are giving error.

Add these activities to your App manifest with android:exported="true" and app tools:node="merge" this will add exported attribute to the activities giving error.

Example:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69287478

QUESTION

Can't find variable: IDBIndex on firebase/react native(expo)

Asked 2022-Mar-19 at 14:59

I am developing a RN app in Expo with firebase as backend. So far, the app only uses firebase auth and firestore and for whatever reason, I randomly started getting the error of ReferenceError: Can't find variable: IDBIndex. I adjusted my firebase config to suit the v9 standards instead of using the compat package. I ensured my app was not using Google Analytics. I have also downgraded to firebase@9.1.0 which matches up with the expo documentation and this other similar post. I have also git reverted into previous versions of the app (with earlier dependencies and code) when it was working but still got back the same error. When this occurred, I entirely reinstalled node and npm because I thought that was the only other possible reason this could be happening but that was to no avail as well (getting the same IDB error). I still think this is a firebase related issue, but I am pretty much all out of ideas as to what it could be.

Here is my firebase config:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-07 at 22:22

I've been getting the same issue, I've tried all the same things as you to no avail. I symbolicated the logs from firebase test lab and came up with this:

Stacktrace

Generally I have no idea how all of these libraries work together, but are you using typesense with firestore? I wonder if your stack trace calls out the same files, but I can't find any smoking gun here. I'll keep updating this thread if I find something. (I would have commented but I don't have the rep yet)

Update: Looks like my build just fixed itself somehow, even submitting builds from this weekend that would constantly crash. So truly I'm not sure what happened but it may be resolved

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71375265

QUESTION

How to fix the error (TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'map' of object '#')

Asked 2022-Mar-05 at 09:40

I am sending my data to MongoDB via Mongoose. Now, during the fetch of API route for it, an error is thrown.

Code

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 00:32

This issue occured recently and apparently its happening with latest version of node.

issue link

So you can change the version of node to older version and it will be fixed. I am using node version v14.19.0

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71073107

QUESTION

throwError(error) is now deprecated, but there is no new Error(HttpErrorResponse)

Asked 2022-Mar-01 at 00:42

Apparently throwError(error) is now deprecated. The IntelliSense of VS Code suggests throwError(() => new Error('error'). new Error(...) accepts only strings. What's the correct way to replace it without breaking my HttpErrorHandlerService ?

http-error.interceptor.ts ...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Aug-04 at 19:08

Instead of this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68655492

QUESTION

Github Actions Failing

Asked 2022-Feb-25 at 02:08

Github Actions were working in my repository till yesterday. I didnt make any changes in .github/workflows/dev.yml file or in DockerFile.

But, suddenly in recent pushes, my Github Actions fail with the error

Setup, Build, Publish, and Deploy
...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jul-27 at 13:24

I fixed it by changing uses value to

uses: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud@master

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68516559

QUESTION

android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify

Asked 2022-Feb-23 at 14:13

After upgrading to android 12, the application is not compiling. It shows

"Manifest merger failed with multiple errors, see logs"

Error showing in Merged manifest:

Merging Errors: Error: android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for android:exported when the corresponding component has an intent filter defined. See https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element#exported for details. main manifest (this file)

I have set all the activity with android:exported="false". But it is still showing this issue.

My manifest file:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Aug-04 at 09:18

I'm not sure what you're using to code, but in order to set it in Android Studio, open the manifest of your project and under the "activity" section, put android:exported="true"(or false if that is what you prefer). I have attached an example.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68554294

QUESTION

Android Build Error: "lStar not found..."

Asked 2022-Feb-18 at 06:59

I have error like this after trying to build my apps in Emulator

/Users/joel/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/06231cc1265260b25a06bafce7a4176f/transformed/core-1.7.0-alpha02/res/values/values.xml:105:5-114:25: AAPT: error: resource android:attr/lStar not found.

I don't know what causes this error. After digging some answer which has similarly error (but in flutter) Problem. But still not solved my issue.

I have this dependency in my project

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Sep-28 at 17:18

I managed to fix this by upgrading compileSdk to 31 and kotlin gradle plugin to 1.5.10

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69041630

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install auth

There is an example project in the /app folder that uses the Reddit API and shows how the library could be used. You have to add your own CLIENT_ID if you want to run the example! Take not of the two Retrofit services used (one without authentication, the other one with auth headers) to prevent deadlocks when refreshing the token. Sadly you will still need to add some boilerplate as you can see next. The library is currently published on my bintray repository, so add the following to the end of your repositories in your root build.gradle file. Then include the packages. You start by extending AuthenticatorService and return an implementation of AuthCallback that enables token refreshing. In your AuthCallback you should call your API and trade the refresh token for a new access token. Then you add the service to your manifest, registering the AccountAuthenticator.

Support

This library will keep a 0.* version until I am happy with the interface and can provide solid support for the most common OAuth use cases with multiple users. As such the current interfaces might change with any update. Feedback about the usage and API is welcome. When you decide to add a feature request please think about whether this is a common use case that should be handled by this library.

Find more information at: