nano | A light Android web serivce client framework

The essence of the issue was the assumption that torify sets up a tor connection, which it did not by itself. Furthermore, running:

There is no significance to the empty lines in the import group.

Some editors (including VSCode) put standard library imports first, then add an empty line, and then other (3rd party imports). Also the 2 groups are sorted alphabetically.

Again, there is no significance to this other than being easier to read. It also comes handy if everyone formats imports like this, so there are no "meaningless" commits in a version system due to different import sorting / organizing.

what is this 4410102, is it nano seconds or some thing else. How to not see this.

This is fraction-of-second. If you do not want to see it, truncate the value to seconds.

SOLVED

The solution here is not to ssh into the VM, and instead to change to the VM context with:

The problem is in History.js:

Make sure your rewrite mod is enabled.

or simply run this in terminal

Ideally you shouldn't run python using sudo; as it will not necessarily pick up the installed modules created using pip running under your own user account.

Try just running:

Nevermind, i just update my mamp to newer version

Your approach does not work. The correct approach is this:

• Unless you are a performance expert (which is hard to become), do not make assumptions about what kind of code performs well vs. performs poorly, and maintain skepticism when analysing profiler reports. This is not particularly useful advice (it boils down to: A profiler report may be lying to you!), but it is what it is. Effectively, either be a performance expert, or accept that there's not much you can do about it. Sucks, but, don't shoot the messenger.
• Write idiomatic java code. It is easiest to maintain and most likely to get optimized by hotspot.
• Reduction of algorithmic complexity is useful and should always be the first thing you check. To some extent, an optimization that reduces algorithmic complexity gets to ignore the first rule. You do not need to be particularly up to date on the vagaries of JVMTI or Flight Recorder and how profilers work to conclude that an algorithmic rewrite is worthwhile and is going to significantly improve performance.
• do not trust pithy rules of thumb, no matter how many people are saying it. Do not look for 'easy to apply patterns' like 'replace all foreach loops by appending an if-block that tests for empty first' - these are essentially never correct and usually reduce performance.
• Be aware that bad performance advice is rampant. You should never treat ubiquitous presence of some argument otherwise bereft of proof or research as "that makes it more likely to be true" as a general principle in life and logical reasoning (it is, after all, a logical fallacy!), but this counts double for performance!

Presumably, you're not going to trust the above maxims just because I'm telling you to trust them. I'll try to take you through some falsifiable reasoning to show you why the above maxims are correct.

In particular, this idea of checking for empty first seems extremely misguided.

Let's first translate the overly hyperbolical and therefore rather useless well-known maxim premature optimization is the root of all evil into something more tangible:

Do not make your code an ugly, caveat-ridden mess of weirdness because of an imagined performance issue.

Do not go by "people" here. Because "people" are notorious for being utterly wrong on performance, time and time again. If you can find widespread, pithy and entirely bereft of proof or research statements that X is good or bad for performance, you can rest assured in the thought that this means absolutely nothing whatsoever. Your average joe twitter writter or whatnot is a clueless idiot in this regard. Proof, ample research, or credentials are an absolute requirement to take things seriously, preferably 2 or 3 of those. There are lists of well known performance falsehoods (commonly held beliefs about how to improve JVM performance that absolutely do not help whatsoever and often actually hurt), and if you then search for these falsehoods you can find entire hordes of folks who espouse it, thus proving that you just cannot trust anything based solely on the fact that you "keep hearing it".

Note also that for just about every imaginable line of java code, you can come up with 100+ plausible if somewhat exotic ideas on how to make the code less obvious but seemingly 'more performant'. Clearly then you can't apply all 100 variants to every line in the entire project, so the road you were planning on taking here ("I do not quite trust that profiler, I find it plausible escape analysis will fail to eliminate this iterator allocation, so, just to be safe I will add an if that checks for empty first"), ends in a disaster where even the simplest task becomes a many-lined, seemingly excessively redundant soup. And performance will be worse on average, so it's a lose-lose scenario.

Here's a simple example to drive the point home, and you can watch those presentations by Doug for more of this sort of thing: