callouts | JavaFX application that demonstrates callouts

That's related to some unexpected issue related to the use of --nomultiline or IRB.conf[:USE_MULTILINE] = false inside .irbrc file.

Similar issue with the hack

To avoid that issue, you can just skip using --nomultiline option, when launching your rails console.

The dummy data you provided in the mock class will be dutifully returned. And yes, it's annoying, double work.

But how else could it be done? Really calling an external API might have bad consequences (sending "My Awesome Test Order!!!1one!eleven" to production fulfilment system would be a disaster, especially if you do it few times because deployment kept failing). And when such API would be down and you really, really need to deploy something to production - you shouldn't be a hostage of 3rd party server, even test one.

Instead of grumbling try to embrace it. Yes, it's rubbish. But this is your opportunity to test how your code handles different outputs. How it reacts when the API response is "HTTP 500 Internal Server Error", HTML instead of JSON or even there's no response, just timeout. The more solid you make it, the more confident you'll be.

Is it really that hard? Capture couple real messages & errors, remove sensitive data, implement some switch statement "if account number = 123 return this else return that" and you're done.

And yes, it essentially means implementing 3rd party's logic yourself. But well, with test-driven development you ideally would start with a dummy representation of their service anyway, something that's close enough to the API "contract" you have. And as a bonus - you get to shout at them when something suddenly breaks and you can prove it wasn't a change on your end.

In the end it's not too different from splitting work with another SF developer. "OK, I'll do the UI bit, you do the apex bit, here's the data interface we promise to use, see you in 1 week's time". How far can you trust the guy, eh? ;)

In your case, as you're alrady grouping by driver, you can use sum(excused) and you will get the summed value of the excused column which gives you the total number of unexcused absences. SELECT driver, callouts.id, max(date), count(*) as count, sum(excused) as unexcused FROM employees, callouts WHERE employees.id = callouts.id AND employees.status = 0 GROUP BY driver ORDER by driver

Answer to this question could be found here in C++, answered by eyllanesc.

Here is a PySide6 version of the answer.

So tests passed, no exceptions, "just" code coverage problem? You included the tests in the changeset?

This looks like it's supposed to be called from a Flow/ProcessBuilder (InvocableMethod). Did you include that flow in package? Is it active? Or Case trigger (if it's called from trigger)

Or make the unit test call HandleUpdateOnReturnRefundCase.handleUpdateOnReturnRefundCase() directly, without "firing mechanism". It's an unit test, not a whole system integration. Test blocks independently and composition separately, will help you nail any errors.

If you still can't figure it out - refresh new sandbox, deploy to it (without unit test run) and continue working there, examine debug logs etc.

Instead, it gets triggered after each batch completes.

I think for this you could use the toArray() operator:

Kindly check the highlighted part of above image, that i got using below link 'https://jsfiddle.net/gh/get/library/pure/highcharts/highcharts/tree/master/samples/highcharts/series-timeline/connector-styles'

First, we do not need to write viewFor or method anymore (except where you need custom logic for more than just a single annotation and cluster annotation). Nowadays, we let the OS do that for us. We just move the configuration of these into their own objects, and register them with the mapview.

So, in viewDidLoad:

You can remove the newline character with str.replace And you can unescape html characters like & with html.unescape