keycloak-authorization | add authorization capabilities to keycloak | Identity Management library
kandi X-RAY | keycloak-authorization Summary
kandi X-RAY | keycloak-authorization Summary
The purpose of this module is to add authorization capabilities to keycloak for a given client, whether the client itself has the capability to handle authorization or not. This means that:. While best practice is to have the client handle authorisation tasks, if necessary with the aid of an external service, many clients do not have this capability. This is why IDPs such as Microsoft's Azure AD offer this service, and why we provide this module for keycloak. It should be noted that the authorization step happens after authentication, so a user which is connected in SSO will not need re-input his login details to when switching between clients he has access to, and clients which he doesn't have access to. Currently working on 3.4.3.Final (check tags for compatibility with previous keycloak versions).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Authenticated client session
- Determine name id format
- Gets the name id
- Attempts to find a persistent type name id for a client session
- Sends an error to the client
- Translate an error message
- Translates a protocol error to its SAML status
- Sets the security tokens after the authentication flow
- Get the SAML assertion token format
- Sets attributes for a client
- Sends an error to the login session
- Handles a front channel logout
- Send a pushNotBefore
- Handles logout request
- Gets all certificates
- Handles a logout request
- Initialize the scope
- Logout the backchannel
- Returns the OIDC redirect code
- Handles a logout
- Handles a backchannel logout request
- Creates a ResponseToken and returns the response token
- Add default client values to the client model
- Logout the client
- Setup the client defaults
- Process a grant request
keycloak-authorization Key Features
keycloak-authorization Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on keycloak-authorization
QUESTION
When starting Quarkus 2.7.1 with dev services enabled for KeyCloak, you can specify quarkus.keycloak.devservices.realm-path=realm.json in the application.properties.
The documentation for this property just says:
The class or file system path to a Keycloak realm file which will be used to initialize Keycloak.
It does not clearly state relative to what base directory the path is being resolved.
There are example projects where the file is placed inside a config/ subdir. I tried this as well as in the project's root dir. Neither location seems to work, the file is ignored and Quarkus creates a realm with its default values instead.
Specifying an absolute path works just fine.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-17 at 15:55Everything in the classpath is searched for the path specified in the property, e.g. resources dir.
The documentation already gives a hunch: "The class or ...", so at very least the classpath must be searched.
In the linked example project, in the maven pom the resources are extended to also include config, therefore it works there.
QUESTION
I have a SPA (Vue.js) that communicates via REST with a Quarkus Resource API . I am using my own Keycloak for Authentication/Authorization.
In Keycloak I have two clients in my realm:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-10 at 09:19I'm guessing that because your Quarkus application use a bearer only client, it will only check the authenticity of the bearer token using the signature.
Since it will not make any call to Keycloak for additional verifications, it will not use the client id and client secret in your properties.
You need to change the type of the client to confidential if you want quarkus to use that.
By the way, in the quarkus quickstart for protecting service applications : the keycloak client use a confidential client, and bearer only is set to false : https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-quickstarts/blob/main/security-openid-connect-quickstart/config/quarkus-realm.json#L395
QUESTION
I tried to set up a working Oauth2 authorization via Keycloak in a Ktor web server. The expected flow would be sending a request from the web server to keycloak and logging in on the given UI, then Keycloak sends back a code that can be used to receive a token. Like here
First I did it based on the examples in Ktor's documentation. Oauth It worked fine until it got to the point where I had to receive the token, then it just gave me HTTP status 401. Even though the curl command works properly. Then I tried an example project I found on GitHub , I managed to make it work by building my own HTTP request and sending it to the Keycloak server to receive the token, but is it supposed to work like this?
I have multiple questions regarding this.
Is this function supposed to handle both authorization and getting the token?
...
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-05 at 10:52The answer to your first question: it will be used for both if that route corresponds to the redirect URI returned in urlProvider lambda.
The overall process is the following:
- A user opens http://localhost:7777/login (any route under
authenticate) in a browser - Ktor makes a redirect to
authorizeUrlpassing necessary parameters - The User logs in through Keycloak UI
- Keycloak redirects the user to the redirect URI provided by
urlProviderlambda passing parameters required for acquiring an access token - Ktor makes a request to the token URL and executes the routing handler that corresponds to the redirect URI (http://localhost:7777/callback in the example).
- In the handler you have access to the
OAuthAccessTokenResponseobject that has properties for an access token, refresh token and any other parameters returned from Keycloak.
Here is the code for the working example:
QUESTION
I have a Quarkus microservice doing authentication and authorization with Keycloak using quarkus-oidc and quarkus-keycloak-authorization extensions.
I need to additionally implement following two request interceptors/filters:
- A filter before any auth logic kicks in. This is to copy token from query param to header (required for web sockets). What should be the priority of this filter?
- A filter to have custom authorization logic. This should be executed after all authentication and keycloak authorization logic but just before API execution? What should be priority of this filter?
I tried putting @Priority(Interceptor.Priority.PLATFORM_BEFORE) and @Prematching also to my filter, but even this is being called after OIDC kicks in.
Also, is there any way to support extending quarkus oidc logic to include custom code?
I am unable to get the priority of oidc and keycloak-auth interceptors (knowing these could help me deciding the priority of my filters). Please help.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-22 at 07:39Got the answer from quarkus google groups.
For #2, ContainerRequestFilter with any priority (should not be @Prematching) will serve the purpose.
Other option is to have custom HttpSecurityPolicy. This would be called after authentication.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install keycloak-authorization
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
