time-id | Generates 27-character , time-ordered , k-sortable , | Identity Management library

The error message about duplicate row names is a bit misleading as pglm cannot handle the specific input glm can handle with a two-column matrix specifying the proporion (cbind(passers, fails) in your code). glm is more flexible regards the various input possiblities, see ?glm.

pglm can only handle a binary dependent variable as input on the left-hand side of the formula. Thus, you want to bring down the data to the "individual level" (Here is some better discussion of the topic with individual outcome (binary response) and group outcome (proportion), using glm http://www.simonqueenborough.info/R/statistics/lessons/Binomial_Data.html; http://pages.stat.wisc.edu/~mchung/teaching/MIA/reading/GLM.logistic.Rpackage.pdf).

Here is some code that gives you the data transformation to replicate the model you estimated using glm with pglm. See how the total number of exam takers (passers and fails) is used to bring the data down to the individual outcome (binary response) from the group level (proportion).

Using the pipe (%>%), mutate, group_by, and lag functions from the dplyr package

This is a common problem, and no matter how precise you try to be, the computer will need to round numbers with repeating decimals at some point. Here's some posts that deal with it:

• How to make rounded percentages add up to 100%
• How to deal with the sum of rounded percentage not being 100?

In those posts you can read about many complex ways to get very close to 100%, but basically there is no right way to do this - when it's all boiled down it's still going to be an estimate - not exactly precise because we're dealing with not-precise numbers. That's just the nature of the beast.

Your program is going to round numbers the wrong way because it's a computer, and it's not intelligent.

Depending on your application, you may want to invest time into reading how to do those complex methods, and maybe you'll get really close.

Any path you choose, you'll probably end up putting a footnote explaining this problem anyway. Something like this:

*Because of rounding, these values may not add up to 100%.

I structure my object like this:

I am using groupby

dotnet publish builds the project before copying binaries to the output directory. The files you see in bin\Release\netcoreapp2.0\win-x64 directory are the result of dotnet build command. You could check it by running following command:

dotnet build --configuration Release --runtime win-x64

You will see exactly the same files as if you run dotnet publish --configuration Release --runtime win-x64.

Output binaries provided by build stage are then copied to publish directory together with required dependencies. You probably could expect that binaries are built right away to publish directory without necessity to duplicate them from build directory to publish. Well, it's a fair assumption. However it will harm separation of different stages - build and publish. Also as far as HDD resource is very cheap now, it shouldn't be a big issue.