Picky | UI Policy app for BinderFilter

All these "magical" constants are resolved at compile time, unlike regular constants, which are resolved at runtime.

https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.constants.magic.php

So no, you are not saving any CPU time

Instructions to setup Tensorflow 2.4.x (tested for 2.4.1) on an Ubuntu 20.04 environment without admin rights. It is assumed that a sysadmin already installed the latest Cuda drivers. It consists of install Cuda 11.0 toolkit + CuDNN 8.2.0.

Instructions below will install CUDA 11.0 (tested to work for Tensorflow 2.4.1) under directory /home/pherath/cuda_toolkits/cuda-11.0 without sudo rights.

Step 1. Download CUDA 11.0

That's why you usually never find prebuilt kernel module distributed somewhere. You have to build kernel module with kernel headers of your running kernel. Common practice is always having the right kernel headers in your /usr/src

Where does the initial state that you want to compress come from? I guess there are three likely options.

1. It's random. Most likely that means some code seeded a pseudo random number generator using some value like e.g. the time of the day, then used that to produce the values. In this case, you could get your hands on the seed (which most likely would be a fairly short number) and use that as the identifier from which everything else is computed. Make sure to use a portable random number generator with well-defined deterministic behaviour, e.g. some Mersenne Twister implementation. The JavaScript built in number generator is implementation-defined so it does not fit this bill.

2. It came from some catalog made by the game developer (i.e. you). Then just obfuscating the index into that catalog might be good enough.

3. It came from some user hand-tuning the values. In this case you're out of luck, since as I understand the problem chances are that any possible combination could get entered. You can't compress a large set of values to a smaller set of values without losing information.

There might be middle grounds. You could have a randomised setup that subsequently got hand-tuned, and the description as initial seed plus a few modifications would be shorter than the full set of settings. Or the hand-tuning would only be allowed following specific rules set out by the game developer, which again would make for a limited set of possible values and a potentially shorter encoding. Thinking along these categories might help you analyze your own situation and find a suitable solution.

You can also look at this from an information theory point of view. You can't expect to encode a sequence of fully independent and uniformly distributed digits with less information than those digits, perhaps expressed in some other base or whatever. You can compress data if there are patterns to it that make some combinations more likely than others. The more you tell us about these patterns, the better we might be able to advise. In total you can't get below the entropy of the source (i.e. game state distribution), so estimating that might help you find a lower bound for what to expect.

Your function has only one return type, but this type may be an enum:

you should initialize and putting data in list in DataGrifWidgetClass and pass the lists into employeeDataSource, i can share my code with you

ANSWER or EXPLANATION

After fiddling with this some more. Using only_video=True doesn't seem to be compatible with certain methods that are appealing to include for a good video. However, it seems as of now only using pytube, you can get a full length video that isn't corrupted but only in 360p.

I might not understand your question clearly because I am new in this business. But I write this lines of code and it saves the images aspect ratio.

You can do away with the stack-based security by introducing a context object that provides access to the event.

But first, a few notes. I'm not going to speak to the merits of this design because that's subjective. However, I will address some terminology, naming, and design matters.

1. .NET's naming convention for events does not includethe "On" prefix. Rather, the method that raises the event (marked private or protected virtual, depending on whether you can inherit the class) has the "On" prefix. I've followed this convention in the code below.

2. The name "DelegateFactory" sounds like something that create delegates. This does not. It accepts a delegate and you're using it to perform an action within a retry loop. I'm having a tough time word-smithing this one, though; I've called the class Retryer and the method Execute in the code below. Do with that what you will.

3. DelegateWork/Execute return a bool but you never check it. It's unclear if that's an oversight in the example consumer code or a flaw in this thing's design. I'll leave it to you to decide, but because it follows the Try pattern to determine if the output parameter is valid, I'm leaving it there and using it.

4. Because you're talking about network-related actions, consider writing one or more overloads that accept an awaitable delegate (i.e. returns Task). Because you can't use ref or out parameters with async methods, you'll need to wrap the bool status value and the return value of the delegate in something, such as a custom class or a tuple. I will leave this as an exercise to the reader.

5. If an argument is null, make sure you throw ArgumentNullException and simply pass it the name of the argument (e.g. nameof(work)). Your code throws ArgumentException, which is less specific. Also, use the is keyword to ensure you're doing a reference equality test for null and not accidentally invoking overloaded equality operators. You'll see that in the code below, as well.

Introducing a Context Object

I'm going to use a partial class so that the context is clear in each snippet.

First, you have the events. Let's follow the .NET naming convention here because we want to introduce invoker methods. It's a static class (abstract and sealed) so those will be private. The reason for using invoker methods as a pattern is to make raising an event consistent. When a class can be inherited and an invoker method needs to be overridden, it has to call the base implemention to raise the event because the deriving class doesn't have access to the event's backing storage (that could be a field, as in this case, or perhaps the Events property in a Component-derived type where the key used on that collection is kept private). Although this class is uninheritable, it's nice to have a pattern you can stick to.

The concept of raising the event is going to go through a layer of semantic translation, since the code that registers the event handler may not be the same as the code that calls this method, and they could have different perspectives. The caller of this method wants to post a message. The event handler wants to know that a message has been received. Thus, posting a message (PostMessage) gets translated to notifying that a message has been received (OnMessageReceived).