kandi X-RAY | Nimbus-JOSE-JWT Summary
kandi X-RAY | Nimbus-JOSE-JWT Summary
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Signs the content
- Returns the initial parameters
- Format the signature
- Performs the ECDSA signature
- Return this object as a JSON object
- Serialize the object to JSON
- Return a JSON representation of this object
- Parses a JSON - encoded JWT
- Splits a serialized JOSE JOSE object into two parts
- Gets the original parsed string
- Sign the content using the private key
- Returns the set of included parameters for this request
- Verifies the signature
- Returns a serialized version of this JWS object
- Returns the string representation of this payload
- Gets the claims set
- Compresses the specified byte array
- Generates a base64 - encoded signature for the given content
- Verify the signed content
- Decompresses the specified byte array
- Encrypt the JWE object using the given encrypter
- Parses a string into a JOSE object
- Converts the token to a JSON representation
- Returns the set of included parameters
- Returns a serialized version of the JWE object
- Verifies the signature of the signed content
Nimbus-JOSE-JWT Key Features
Nimbus-JOSE-JWT Examples and Code Snippets
Trending Discussions on Nimbus-JOSE-JWT
I am trying to figure out whether i should pick(based on the adoption):
I found that jose4j 's author, Brian Campbell, is active, based on the commits, it has the features that i need i.e support for
JWE and it works well, but what i don't like is this:
So, are developers picking jose4j, is it a good choice(am i being paranoid?) or should i move to nimbus(the Used By artifacts is more for nimbus, does it mean it s more widely adopted?)...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-18 at 13:36
Looks like that vulnerability is in Logback, which is a dependency that's only used in the unit tests (further down that page you screenshotted shows the different dependency categorizations).
I need get that updated, obviously, but it doesn't impact the library itslef.
I implemented a rest authorization server that returns the public-key for a given keyId in the JWK format using the
com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt:9.13 package. The code looks something like this:
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Sep-01 at 16:35
The answer is to use
String for (de)serialization for those facing this problem. Why, you ask? According to the RFC, JWK is a string in the JSON format. While
nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt defines a JWK object, any APIs that return valid JWK (or
JWKSet) can assume that it's a string.
I also raised this issue with the developers of this package, and they recommended using
Map for (de)serialization.
following this example I wrote some code to validate an access token return by implicit flow from azure....
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-02 at 13:15
You need to
expose an API scope in Azure, and get the client to use that. Also ensure that there is no
nonce field in the JWT header of the access token. My blog post has further info.
AZURE AD BEHAVIOR
The above behavior is quite specific to Microsoft, and is required when using Azure AD as a provider:
Tokens with a nonce field in the JWT header are designed only for MS APIs, eg Graph, and use an in-house validation mechanism. The intent is for these to always fail validation in custom APIs.
Tokens for your own custom APIs must be retrieved via clients that request custom scopes. Note that the OAuth client configured in Azure AD can be a logical entry, rather than needing to maintain one for each individual API.
I believe the MS behavior is based on OAuth resource indicators, though my personal preference is to use more mainstream techniques of scopes, claims and audience checks when receiving access tokens in APIs.
Facing the below error while trying to deploy an encryption java cloud function on Google cloud. [Note, function works locally]....
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Feb-21 at 07:57
Your error is stating that you are attempting to use a class which does not exist. If it works locally and it does not work on Google Cloud, that means the libraries/jar are not configured properly.
If what you are deploying is a Fat/Uber jar, unzip the jar and verify the location of
An uber JAR is a JAR file that contains the function classes as well as all of its dependencies. You can build an uber JAR with both Maven and Gradle
If what you are deploying is a Thin Jar, ensure that your dependencies are in a package relative to the JAR deployed.
A thin JAR is a JAR file that contains only the function classes without the dependencies embedded in the same JAR file. Because the dependencies are still needed for deployment, you need to set things up as follows:
The dependencies must be in a subdirectory relative to the JAR to be deployed. The JAR must have a META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file that includes a Class-Path attribute whose value lists the required dependency paths.
The Google Cloud documentation is very clear on how you can use Maven/Gradle to deploy either.
I have a grails application written in Groovy. It is built and works when it's launched with :...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Feb-18 at 12:22
I can't believe I wasted two days straight on this because someone wrote the package with an uppercase letter. There was a class in a package :
In my application config i have defined the following properties:...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Feb-16 at 13:12
Acording to this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51236918/16651073 tomcat falls back to default logging if it can resolve the location
Can you try to save the properties without the spaces.
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Jan-27 at 11:29
The problem was occurring because the default authentication manager wasn't working for me, I had to implement one specifically for my problem.
I am facing an authentication issue in a reactive Spring Boot application using OAuth2 and AWS Cognito. Namely, I configured my app like it's suggested in post here but the problem is that the default login page is failing while authentication attempts or visits.
redirect-uri=http://localhost:8080/login/oauth2/code/cognito I am getting For
redirect-uri=https://fitnesstest.auth.eu-central-1.amazoncognito.com/login/cognito I am receiving
An error was encountered with the requested page.
Funnily enough, I can receive the tokens via postman for the below client-id, client-secret and callback URL but somehow from the spring boot application, it's not possible.
my first approach of application.properties look like:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Dec-24 at 17:31
Turned out that there is a chance to debug
Invalid credentials error for OAuth2 approach. After a suggestion from https://stackoverflow.com/a/62917085/10596295, I debugged the application and realized that there is a problem with the property
My final version of application.yml looks like this:
I'm wasting a lot of time right now with AOP logging setup. I don't know why AOP isn't working in my project. I think I've done all the settings I can. Please let me know if you guys have a solutions. Thank you.
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Nov-18 at 18:42
The following should work:
The class DefaultJWKSetCache of nimbus-jose-jwt has two fields, lifespan and refreshTime.
From Java docs -
lifespan - The lifespan of the cached JWK set before it expires, negative means no expiration.
refreshTime - The time after which the cached JWK set is marked for refresh, negative if not specified. Should be shorter or equal to the lifespan.
What is the difference between these two.
Does it mean that,
after the lifespan expiry the cached JWK set will be evicted and loaded again from jwks remote url (saying remote url as i am using
and after the refresh expiry the existing JWK set will be updated with the keys retrieved from remote url.
But i don't understand the practical difference between the two. Both seem to be doing same. Can some one explain the details with more granularity and any example.
Edit - if i give no expiry for lifespan, and 1 hour expiry for refreshTime, am i guaranteed that my keys will be updated every one hour....
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Nov-21 at 04:21
The lifespan is the time after which the DefaultJWKSetCache will evict cached
JWKSet. I.e., after lifespan time units passed since the cache was populated the calls to
JWKSetCache.get() will always return
null until new
JWKSet is stored to the cache.
The refreshTime is the time that impacts value returned by
JWKSetCache.requiresRefresh() method. After refreshTime time units passed since the cache was populated this method will return
true, otherwise, it will return
false. This setting does not impact cache behavior in any way.
The RemoteJWKSet uses the value returned by
JWKSetCache.requiresRefresh() to re-download
JWKSet from remote URL before the cache is actually expired. This is why documentation recommends to set refreshTime to a lesser value than lifespan.
RemoteJWKSet triggers download of remote
JWKSet when either lifespan or refreshTime has passed (see this line.) Hence, there is not much difference in setting either one of these as of today. I guess some more complex logic can be potentially implemented having these two values separate.
No vulnerabilities reported
You can use Nimbus-JOSE-JWT like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the Nimbus-JOSE-JWT component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Reuse Trending Solutions
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page