ModuleBuild | build module to apk demo | Build Tool library
kandi X-RAY | ModuleBuild Summary
kandi X-RAY | ModuleBuild Summary
build module to apk demo
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Get last date for given date
- Get last month of last month
- Get last date
- Get last month of last month
- Get last date
- Get last month of last month
- Get last date for given day
- Get last month of last month
- Decode Base64 encoded data
- Removes all white space characters from the base64 string
- Get month list
- Get day of month
- Start the SensorManager
- Click the view
- Get length of string
- Gets a random check bar code
- Scale image to a bitmap
- Check if two dates are in the same day
- Distance between two dates
- Takes a view of the screen view and returns a bitmap with the status bar
- Gets an object from the preferences
- Put object
- Notify listeners about a sensor changed
- Get compressed image
- Filter pkgs
- Compress the specified bitmap
- Get the Marketplace package name
- Takes a status bar and returns a bitmap that is not null
- Puts an object into memory
ModuleBuild Key Features
ModuleBuild Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ModuleBuild
QUESTION
Working with Laravel 7 my resources->sass->app.scss is like the following:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-20 at 12:03Have you actually created the variables.scss file?
Laravel doesn't create this by default unless you run one of laravel/ui presets: bootstrap, vue, react
QUESTION
Given the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-14 at 13:16I see the following errors in your code. After fixing those I was able to run your without any problems.
QUESTION
I am trying to make a compiler in F# using the API provided in System.Reflection.Emit. I am running into a problem when I try to create functions (delegates) for the types in the assembly that I am currently building. Example translating the following Java (a slightly modified version of Java) class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-13 at 02:48If I needed to generate the same instruction for a function that uses .NET types, for instance Func, then the above code works perfectly (the types array is
types = [| typeof ; typeof |]in this case).
TypeBuilder inherits from Type, so you just pass the instance that represents the type you're building when you want a reference to that type. In other words, the array you want is types = [| typeBuilder :> System.Type; typeof |]
QUESTION
As you can see in below screencast, manipulating the second input field in my form also changes the value of the first one. I've completely reproduced it on JSfiddle in an isolated environment to track down the bug but didn't find it.
Quick overview of my code base:
A functional component ModuleBuilder has an Array in its state called blocks and a renderFunction which renders for each element of blocks one instance of a subcomponent called ModuleElement.
The subcomponent ModuleElement displays an input form element. When I create n instances of the subcomponent and try to type something in the the form element of the second instance then the first one's value gets updated as well.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-31 at 13:36I was able to solve the problem after coincidentally reading this question.
I replaced the setBlocks line here:
QUESTION
I was trying to migrate .Net Core console app and tests from 2.1 to 3.1 and got a problem in my tests. I was using Moq library and it was working fine. After migration i started to get A non-collectible assembly may not reference a collectible assembly when trying to access any mocked objects. I have reproduced same behavior in completely new project. I was not able to find any relevant information on this topic. I have tested it with both MSTest and Xunit. Is this a Moq library issue or .Net Core 3.1 should use different approach to such cases?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-06 at 13:27For the sake of anyone else landing on this from google...
We are using the latest Rider/ReSharper EAP (2020.2 EAP 8) which has introduced this bug when:
- Running tests via the Rider/ReSharper test runner
- The test project references and uses a mocking library that attempts to generate dynamic proxies (Moq, NSubstitute, etc...)
This has been fixed by JetBrains in their development branch and will be fixed in the next EAP. You can track this here: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RIDER-48134
Update: EAP 9 is out which fixes this 🎉 You can use JetBrains Toolbox to update.
QUESTION
I tried and fail to adapt this code. This is dynamic class generator from assembly on C# language. I can't use DynamicObjects because RDLC report doesn't work with none class from System.Dynamic but work great with that class generated by assembly.
What I'm trying to do is to change the property definition from a private variable to a method get and set. Don't need to be a property if it work with two functions will be great.
The code below I have commented the part that I need to change.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-06 at 06:49How about adding the code-to-generate into the target class, like so
QUESTION
To expand on the title, I'm using Reflection to generate a custom subclass that will eventually have an arbitrary number of string properties which they'll internally store in a dictionary. In this case I'm just using one. I've used Ildasm.exe to get the MSIL that I need for the My Set method works, as the debugger shows the value I'm assigning, but when I try to read it back I get an InvalidProgramException, "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program." which points back to the get method. My get method model is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-08 at 21:59Your immediate problem is that you are using the stloc.0 and ldloc.0 opcodes to read/write into a local without having defined any locals! You can fix that by calling the following at the top of your method:
ilGen.DeclareLocal(typeof(string));
Now here's the thing, the local isn't really required. The code you disassembled and used as your template was obviously compiled in Debug mode. I can tell this due to the local but mostly from the nop's. These two things exist in the debug build to aide in the debugging process, allowing you to step in and view the intermediate values. Your getter can be reduced to the following IL:
QUESTION
I work for several days try to shadow base class's property and set the derived class property to protected using Reflection.Emit. When I create a derived class and set new to the base property, call GetProperties() it only show one property with the name and the derived class property is not public, but the dynamic type call GetProperties() show two properties with the same name appear(base property is public and dynamic type is not public). here is my code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-02 at 16:27You should use CallingConventions.HasThis when you define your property :
QUESTION
I come across HasThis and ExplicitThis calling conventions on .NET Framework reference source, and thus I begin to wonder:
- When are they set by compiler?
- Are there any examples using this combination of calling conventions (in "real world" managed program)?
MSDN has described them as:
ExplicitThis
Specifies that the signature is a function-pointer signature, representing a call to an instance or virtual method (not a static method). If
ExplicitThisis set,HasThismust also be set. The first argument passed to the called method is still athispointer, but the type of the first argument is now unknown. Therefore, a token that describes the type (or class) of thethispointer is explicitly stored into its metadata signature.
HasThis
Specifies an instance or virtual method (not a static method). At run-time, the called method is passed a pointer to the target object as its first argument (the
thispointer). The signature stored in metadata does not include the type of this first argument, because the method is known and its owner class can be discovered from metadata.
Here is a sample program I wrote to generate a class and constructor using these bits set:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-27 at 06:13The first thing that comes to mind about those two flags are Extension Methods, there's even some information on how the binding of those methods is done while the code is being compiled.
Hope it helps!
QUESTION
I created simple program, which dynamically generates GenericEmitExample1.dll assembly. Such assembly defines following type:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-18 at 12:37From Section III.2.1 of ECMA-335 (which talks about the constrained prefix)
Verifiability:
The ptr argument will be a managed pointer (&) to
thisType. In addition all the normal verification rules of thecallvirtinstruction apply after the ptr transformation as described above. This is equivalent to requiring that a boxedthisTypemust be a subclass of the class whichmethodbelongs to.
I think you're falling foul of "This is equivalent to requiring that a boxed thisType must be a subclass of the class which method belongs to".
method in your case is Int32::ToString(), not Object::ToString(), and so belongs to int. However a boxed int is not a subclass of int.
In order to use a constrained virtual call here, you would have to call Object::ToString(), not Int32::ToString().
I've verified this by changing the callvirt instruction to:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ModuleBuild
You can use ModuleBuild like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the ModuleBuild component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
