kandi X-RAY | swagger Summary
kandi X-RAY | swagger Summary
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Creates a docket that supports REST API requests
- Build api info
- Request a user
- The main application
swagger Key Features
swagger Examples and Code Snippets
Trending Discussions on swagger
I build my Nestjs project with nestjsx to create Restful api. My customer.controller.ts...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-15 at 12:20
After hours of searching, the solution is to add
In the OpenAPI docs about parameter serialization there's a short section about how to serialize query, path, header and cookie parameters with different styles. The schema of these parameters are described as OpenAPI flavoured json schema, which allows infinite nesting of objects and arrays. I haven't found any mention about how to deal with these in the docs:
Let's assume the JSON schema provided for any of the parameters is like this:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-15 at 10:35
Short answer: It's undefined behavior.
- primitive values,
- arrays of primitives,
- simple non-nested objects (with primitive properties).
In case of other types of values (nested objects, objects containing arrays, nested arrays, arrays of objects) the behavior is undefined.
Similarly, OpenAPI's own
deepObject style is currently defined only for simple objects but not for arrays or nested objects. Here are some related comments from the OpenAPI Specification authors/maintainers:
By the way, is there a reason we couldn't have
deepObjectwork for arrays too? [...]
Darrel: Supporting arrays as you describe was my intent. I was supposed to find some canonical implementation to use as a guideline for the behavior, but didn't get around to it.
Ron: If we end up supporting the exploded array notation, it needs to be clear that the first index is 0 (or 1, or -1, or whatever).
Ron: when we defined
deepObjectin the spec, we explicitly chose to not mention what happens when the object has several levels in it, but in our conversations we went with 'not supported'.
There's an existing feature request to extend
deepObject to support arrays and nested structures:
Support deep objects for query parameters with deepObject style
I am using swagger-ui with express and they use different forms for url paths.
Swagger specification uses:
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-12 at 14:17
You could split the string on
/, then map through the outcome array and check if the item starts with
:, if it does, return the item (without
:) between brackets, otherwise return the item. Then
join the array back together with a
I tried to inject my own service in my api controller, but it throws an InvalidOperationException. It is unable to resolve the service. (.NET 5)
What I am doing wrong?...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-14 at 13:35
Example, as per request in comment:
I tested the backend code through swagger and it was working just fine.
this my backend controller code:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-14 at 01:39
As mentioned in the comments, the issue relates the request url, change the url as below:
More detail information, you could refer the following sample:
In my GCP project, I have a python API running in a docker container (using connexion). I want to expose the API (with an API key) using API Gateway.
When I deploy the docker container with
--ingress internal, I get
Access is forbidden. on API calls over the Gateway. So the API gateway cannot access the Google Run container.
When I use
--ingress all, all works as expected, but then my internal API is accessible from the web, which is not what I want.
I created a service account for this:...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-13 at 12:12
Ingress internal means "Accept only the requests coming from the project's VPC or VPC SC perimeter".
When you use API Gateway, you aren't in your VPC, it's serverless, it's in Google Cloud managed VPC. Therefore, your query are forbidden.
And because API Gateway can't be plugged to a VPC Connector (for now) and thus can't route the request to your VPC, you can't use this ingress=internal mode.
Thus, the solution is to set an ingress to all, which is not a concern is you authorize only the legit accounts to access it.
For that, check in Cloud Run service is there is allUsers granted with the roles/run.invoker in your project.
- If yes, remove it
Then, create a service account and grant it the roles/run.invoker on the Cloud Run service.
Follow this documentation
- Step 4: update the x-google-backend in your OpenAPI spec file to add the correct authentication audience when you call your Cloud Run (it's the base service URL)
- Step 5: create a gateway with a backend service account; set the service account that you created previously
At the end, only the account authenticated and authorized will be able to reach your Cloud Run service
All the unauthorized access are filtered by Google Front End and discarded before reaching your service. Therefore, your service isn't invoked for nothing and therefore your pay nothing!
Only API Gateway (and the potential other accounts that you let on the Cloud Run service) can invoke to the Cloud Run service.
So, OK, your URL is public, reachable from the wild internet, but protected with Google Front End and IAM.
I have my API project with
ASP.NET Core (.NET5). Everything is working fine and the Swagger page shows all the APIs. Now, in a controller I want to add a function to export an Excel file. The code in the controller is this:
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-12 at 03:26
You need add a route, change your code like following；
I want to group api endpoints based on tags in Nest js such that all employee endpoints under Employee tag, all site endpoints under Site tag etc. Currently, all my endpoints are under default tag. I am using Swagger in Nest js. Can anyone provide best practice to implement it....
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-11 at 17:15
To attach a controller to a specific tag, use the
When I request any API endpoint from Swagger UI give me the following error
System.InvalidOperationException: No authenticationScheme was specified, and there was no DefaultChallengeScheme found. The default schemes can be set using either AddAuthentication(string defaultScheme) or AddAuthentication(Action configureOptions).
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.AuthenticationService.ChallengeAsync(HttpContext context, String scheme, AuthenticationProperties properties)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.Policy.AuthorizationMiddlewareResultHandler.HandleAsync(RequestDelegate next, HttpContext context, AuthorizationPolicy policy, PolicyAuthorizationResult authorizeResult)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.AuthorizationMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.AuthenticationMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerUI.SwaggerUIMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext httpContext)
at Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Swagger.SwaggerMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext httpContext, ISwaggerProvider swaggerProvider)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.DeveloperExceptionPageMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJVc2VySWQiOiIzIiwiTG9naW5JZCI6ImFkbWluIiwiVXNlclR5cGVJZCI6IjEiLCJFbWFpbCI6ImEiLCJNb2JpbGUiOiJhIiwianRpIjoiMWU1MDY3ODAtMWRjNS00MDYzLWFkMTktMDdlMjg4MzAxOWVjIiwiZXhwIjoxNjIzNDYzNjQ4LCJpc3MiOiJlZHVjYXJlLmNvbSIsImF1ZCI6ImVkdWNhcmUuY29tIn0.G2-D_oIdwUDw_3iz87jxWBIMabFpLlR5ASjCr109kNM
the Swagger configuration is given below...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-11 at 10:20
It's not about Swagger your code is missing AddAuthentication(). The example below registers the Authentication schemes (JWT & Cookie) while using the JWT as the default scheme. More info in the Docuementation.
I created the Webapp API, configured Docker-compose to upload the 3 containers with the database, api and web app. I am now facing a problem with converting decimal values.
In my development environment, when typing a value with decimal places everything goes normal (23,14). See the example in the images: When I upload the containers, this behavior is different and when I put the same value in the container application, it treats the value differently. See the example in the image below.
Both the api and the webapp were configured to take the pt-BR localization pattern, however, in the container this configuration seems to be ignored.
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jun-10 at 02:31
After some time of research and some unsuccessful attempts, I followed a colleague's suggestion to define the location of the containers, as a way to solve the problem, since the definition of culture in the asp.net core api and webapp were not enough to solve the problem. I made locale settings in the Dockerfile and Docker-compose files and from there everything works as desired.
No vulnerabilities reported
You can use swagger like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the swagger component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Reuse Trending Solutions
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page