SimpleText | A simple spannable string helper | Data Manipulation library

Decryption with OpenSSL is principally not possible for several reasons:

• The specified key size AES.keySize = 32 defines a 128 bytes key (which is not passed directly here, but derived from a password). Presumably a 32 bytes key was intended, but CryptoJS specifies key sizes in words, where a word consists of 4 bytes.
  AES is only defined for 16/24/32 bytes keys, i. e. not for the 128 bytes key used. Although the key is invalid for AES, CryptoJS processes this key due to a bug (Issue #293).
  From the key size the round number is derived directly, which results here to 38, (source code). However, AES is only defined for the round numbers 10 (AES-128), 12 (AES-192) and 14 (AES-256) (AES, Security). The generated ciphertext is therefore not AES compatible, i.e. decryption with an AES-compliant tool, in particular OpenSSL, is therefore generally impossible.
  For decryption with OpenSSL to be possible, AES.keySize needs to have one of the values 4/6/8, which corresponds to the permitted round numbers 10/12/14 or AES-128/192/256. The configuration AES.keySize = 32 is therefore a KO criterion for all AES-compliant tools like OpenSSL.

• CryptoJS uses the OpenSSL function EVP_BytesToKey() for key derivation. However, the specified iteration count EvpKDF.cfg.iterations = 1e4 is not supported by OpenSSL for key derivation with EVP_BytesToKey(), only the value 1 (here, last part).
  More modern OpenSSL versions (from 1.1.1) have the option -iter, but this is only used in conjunction with the key derivation PBKDF2, i.e. if -iter is specified, PBKDF2 is automatically used instead of EVP_BytesToKey(), which is not compatible with CryptoJS.
  For decryption to be possible with OpenSSL, EvpKDF.cfg.iterations would need to have the value 1. The configuration EvpKDF.cfg.iterations = 1e4 is therefore a KO criterion for OpenSSL.

• The password passed to CryptoJS is derived from the original password by multiple hashing with SHA512. As already explained in Artjom B.'s comment, this cannot be implemented with OpenSSL alone, but it would at least be possible as part of a script.

• The EvpKDF.cfg.keySize parameter has no effect on encryption/decryption and can be ignored.

If compatible values are used in the posted code instead of the incompatible values, e.g. CryptoJS.algo.AES.keySize = 8 and CryptoJS.algo.EvpKDF.cfg.iterations = 1, decryption with OpenSSL is possible. The following example uses the posted code with compatible values and performs encryption and decryption. The ciphertext can be decrypted with OpenSSL:

A possible solution for you would be to enable output buffering using ob_start, so you can write your html code freely.

I think it's because contactInfo is not defined in the scope. I think it should be attributes.contactInfo. Also you need to move const isValidEmail = validator.isEmail( contactInfo ); inside ContactEdit, just put it right before return statement.

In your case, simply replacing .+ with the non-greedy qualifier *? like this: re.search(r"Subscribe to(.*?)unsub", line) will give you Freds Auto Repair."}},".

Also see: Python non-greedy regexes

If you know that certain characters won't appear in the string you want to find, but will appear after the string, you could use a negative character class. For example [^}]

re.search will only find the first match. To find every match use re.findall instead:

The content you see in the browser is loaded mostly by javascript. By using simple GET requests you do not receive the dynamic content of the page.

By looking at users' pages on YouTube, I can see you do not get a lot of proper HTML information, but rather you get JSONs in the body tag.

To answer your question, in the future when you want to scrape something from a website, first make sure you actually have the content when using requests.get rather than assuming that you get the same content a browser gets.

Now, specifically for the YouTube problem, if you save req.text in a file and open it in a file editor and open the tag, you will see that under the

You are probably better of writing a plain class with Q_PROPERTY to ExtraModel

You can get the event.screenX and Event event.screenY position and using that check the height of the screen by getting screen height and screen width .

screen.height

Then check if the event is not near to the screen height if then make the [matTooltipPosition]="position.value" to be above..

Like this you have to check

The OnHint event does not provide access to any information about the control that is displaying the hint.

However, the OnShowHint event does, and you can fully customize the hint however you want in that event: