owner | Get rid of the boilerplate code | REST library
kandi X-RAY | owner Summary
kandi X-RAY | owner Summary
The goal of OWNER API is to minimize the code required to handle application configuration through Java properties files. Full documentation available on [project website][website].
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Convert specifications to URIs
- Returns the default specs for the given prefix
- Create a URI from the given spec
- Loads the properties from a URI
- Returns the SAXParserFactory
- Command line tool
- Downloads a file from the given URL string
- Get information about the bean
- Gets the property names
- Prints the application
- Saves a properties file
- Loads properties from the specified URI and stores them in a result
- Creates a client for the given uri
- Resolves the tokenizer of the given method
- Splits the value into tokens
- Invokes the default method on the proxy
- Invokes a method on a proxy
- Create watchable resources
- Invokes the given action on the MBean
- Create a new config factory object
- Clears all property changes
- Convert the given converter method
- Creates a new configuration object
- Removes the property
- Create a map of all known unit names
- Compares this object for equality
owner Key Features
owner Examples and Code Snippets
public boolean declare(int ownerId, int[] resourcesInOrder) {
HashMap touchedNodes = new HashMap();
/* add nodes to graph */
int index = 1;
touchedNodes.put(resourcesInOrder[0], false);
for (index = 1; index < resourcesInOrder.length;
def owner_set(self):
"""Returns all the symbols (simple or composite) that own this QN.
In other words, if this symbol was modified, the symbols in the owner set
may also be affected.
Examples:
'a.b[c.d]' has two owners, 'a' a
public Lock getLock(int ownerId, int resourceID) {
LinkedList list = lockOrder.get(ownerId);
if (list == null) {
return null;
}
LockNode head = list.getFirst();
if (head.getId() == resourceID) {
list.removeFirst();
return head.g
/**
* Example usage:
* Post::ownedByCurrentUser()->get();
*
* @param \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Builder $query
* @return \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Builder
*/
public function scopeOwnedByCurre
CREATE TABLE Linking_Table (CaseNumber VARCHAR(20), Owner VARCHAR(20), Article_Link VARCHAR(20))
INSERT INTO Linking_Table VALUES('ABC1234','John','Linked');
INSERT INTO Linking_Table VALUES('ABC2345','Alex','Linked');
INSERT INTO Lin
from django.core.exceptions import PermissionDenied
class PetOwner(models.Model):
# ...
def delete(self):
has_pets_alive = self.pet_set.filter(alive=True).exists()
if has_pets_alive:
raise PermissionDenied("This owne
constructor() payable {
owner = msg.sender;
}
ERC721(nftAddress).safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), tokenID);
return (spender == owner || isApprovedForAll(owner, spender) || getApproved(tokenId) == spender);
/**
* @d
# Terraform 0.12 and later syntax
provider "aws" {
# ... other configuration ...
default_tags {
tags = {
Environment = "Production"
Owner = "Ops"
}
}
}
resource "aws_vpc" "example" {
# ... other configura
DECLARE @string VARCHAR(1000) =
'$.owner = "javier@tl.com" and $.asignee ="joe" and $.Entities.Entity = "12345" And $.CountryService.Country ="1" and $.CountryService.Service="B"';
SELECT NewString =
STRING_AGG(SUBSTRING(spli
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on owner
QUESTION
What specific syntax or configuration changes must be made in order to resolve the error below in which terraform is failing to create an instance of azuread_application
?
THE CODE:
The terraform code that is triggering the error when terraform apply
is run is as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-07 at 18:35This was a bug, reported as GitHub issue:
The resolution to the problem in the OP is to upgrade the version from 2.5.0
to 2.6.0
in the required_providers
block from the code in the OP above as follows:
QUESTION
I get a list of tokens own by a publicKey thanks to that method :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-14 at 22:45Unsure if this fully addresses your issue, but one way that I've fetched metadata for all tokens in a wallet is by using the metaplex library:
QUESTION
I have the following 2 query plans for a particular query (second one was obtained by turning seqscan off):
The cost estimate for the second plan is lower than that for the first, however, pg only chooses the second plan if forced to do so (by turning seqscan off).
What could be causing this behaviour?
EDIT: Updating the question with information requested in a comment:
Output for EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, VERBOSE)
for query 1 (seqscan on; does not use index). Also viewable at https://explain.depesz.com/s/cGLY:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-17 at 11:43You should have those two indexes to speed up your query :
QUESTION
I'm setting up a reusable workflow using GitHub actions: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/reusing-workflows
Since the calling workflow and called workflow are both in the same repo, I want to reference the latest commit of the called workflow inside my calling workflow's uses
statement.
Example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-08 at 21:48Unfortunatelly, it's not possible to use expressions with uses
now.
One possible workaround (that I used for myself) is to push reusable workflow(s) to one of the stable branches (main
/master
/develop
/etc.) and use SHA as a ref
.
Additional benefit here is that using SHA is actually the recommended way described here.
QUESTION
SOLVED - The categories/channels were set to private which is why they couldn't be changed even with the correct permissions. My solution was to tell the user which ones and to add the role with the permissions manually. I added a message that said they can just give the bot administrator permissions and it will do it for them. Hopefully, this helps anyone who runs into this in the future.
I'm trying to change the permissions of multiple categories and channels using the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-31 at 12:05This is simply how Discord works, if a channel is private and the bot does not have administrator permissions or role that has permissions to view the channel, it is not able to view it.
You can create a new category that the bot can access like this:
QUESTION
I'd like to reset a shared_ptr
without deleting its object and let weak_ptr
of it loses a reference to it. However, shared_ptr
doesn't have release() member function for reasons, so I can't directly do it. The easiest solution for this is just to call weak_ptr
's reset() but the class which owns the shared_ptr
and wants to release it doesn't know which class has weak_ptr
of it. How can that be achieved in this case?
I understand why shared_ptr
doesn't have release function but unique_ptr
. In my case, only one instance owns a pointer, but shared_ptr
can be owned by multiple instances and releasing doesn't make sense then. But if shared_ptr
doesn't have that function, how can I cut connections to weak_ptr
without deleting the object?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-04 at 00:06You may use a shared_ptr
with custom deleter that would prevent the object from being destroyed:
QUESTION
How can I define a Doctrine property in a parent class and override the association in a class which extends the parent class? When using annotation, this was implemented by using AssociationOverride, however, I don't think they are available when using PHP 8 attributes
Why I want to:
I have a class AbstractTenantEntity
whose purpose is to restrict access to data to a given Tenant
(i.e. account, owner, etc) that owns the data, and any entity which extends this class will have tenant_id
inserted into the database when created and all other requests will add the tenant_id
to the WHERE clause. Tenant
typically does not have collections of the various entities which extend AbstractTenantEntity
, but a few do. When using annotations, I handled it by applying Doctrine's AssociationOverride
annotation to the extended classes which should have a collection in Tenant
, but I don't know how to accomplish this when using PHP 8 attributes?
My attempt described below was unsuccessful as I incorrectly thought that the annotation class would magically work with attributes if modified appropriately, but now I see other code must be able to apply the appropriate logic based on the attributes. As such, I abandoned this approach and just made the properties protected and duplicated them in the concrete class.
My attempt:
Tenant entity
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-11 at 18:30Override Field Association Mappings In Subclasses
Sometimes there is a need to persist entities but override all or part of the mapping metadata. Sometimes also the mapping to override comes from entities using traits where the traits have mapping metadata. This tutorial explains how to override mapping metadata, i.e. attributes and associations metadata in particular. The example here shows the overriding of a class that uses a trait but is similar when extending a base class as shown at the end of this tutorial.
Suppose we have a class ExampleEntityWithOverride. This class uses trait ExampleTrait:
QUESTION
I'd like to abstract some of my GitHub Actions with a reusable workflow.
In order to do this, I need to call my newly defined callable workflow in the format {owner}/{repo}/{path}/{filename}@{ref}
e.g. (from the docs)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-20 at 23:55It's as you said: It can't be done at the moment as Github Actions doesn't support expressions with uses
attributes.
There is no workaround (yet?) because the workflow interpreter (that also checks the workflow syntax when you push the workflow to the repository) can't get the value from the expression at that moment.
It could maybe work if the workflow was recognized by the interpreter, but it doesn't event appear on the Actions
tab as it's considered invalid.
For the moment, you can only use tag
, branch ref
or commit hash
after the @
symbol, the same way you use any action.
QUESTION
Ok, I'm totally lost on deadlock issue. I just don't know how to solve this.
I have these three tables (I have removed not important columns):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-26 at 12:54You are better off avoiding serializable isolation level. The way the serializable guarantee is provided is often deadlock prone.
If you can't alter your stored procs to use more targeted locking hints that guarantee the results you require at a lesser isolation level then you can prevent this particular deadlock scenario shown by ensuring that all locks are taken out on ServiceChange
first before any are taken out on ServiceChangeParameter
.
One way of doing this would be to introduce a table variable in spGetManageServicesRequest
and materialize the results of
QUESTION
I have two files main.raku
and TestMod.rakumod
in a directory C:\Users\suman
.
TestMod.rakumod
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-08 at 07:19Despite what I've said in my comment, it's entirely likely that dirname
is behaving according to spec; only it's not in that spec to return a platform-specific name. So it would be interesting to investigate what $*PROGRAM.dirname
returns. If it's a Linux-formatted path, that might be part of the problem.
This is raiph's answer points at: wrong syntax.
If that's the case, we need to get to the "right" syntax. That is why in the first version of this answer I pointed at using IO::Path::Win32 to create that syntax. Other option might be to simply put the directory name by hand. Finally, a bug can't be excluded.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install owner
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page